Digital pioneers in rural regional development: A bibliometric analysis of digitalisation and leadership

Julia Binder; Antje Witting

doi:10.14512/rur.103

Authors

Julia Binder btu Cottbus-Senftenberg
Antje Witting btu Cottbus-Senftenberg

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.14512/rur.103

Keywords:

Digitalisation, regional development, digital pioneers, leadership, bibliometric analysis

Abstract

While research into digitalisation in cities has grown strongly in recent years, rural areas have now also clearly shifted into the focus of attention. An important strand of research into
digitalisation in rural areas can be described as agency perspectives. Current studies point to the driving, transformative force of key figures, for example social entrepreneurs, smart villagers or spatial pioneers. At heart, these studies propose
that paths for collective action can be developed via key figures, thus generating ways to change established rules and norms. This paper represents a methodological contribution to this strand of research by subjecting the debate on leadership
through key figures to a quantitative, bibliometric analysis, on the basis of which a heuristic is proposed in order to develop relevant research questions. Based on different strands of discourse, our results show that unequal spatial development
ismanifested in an urban bias, but also demonstrate the potential of the growing research field in rural regional development.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Ball, R.; Tunger, D. (2005): Bibliometrische Analysen – Daten, Fakten und Methoden. Grundwissen Bibliometrie für Wissenschaftler, Wissenschaftsmanager, Forschungseinrichtungen und Hochschulen. Jülich. = Schriften des Forschungszentrums Jülich, Reihe Bibliothek 12.

Bathelt, H.; Cohendet, P.; Henn, S.; Simon, L. (2020): Innovation and knowledge creation: challenges to the field. In: Bathelt, H.; Cohendet, P.; Henn, S.; Simon, L. (eds.): The Elgar Companion to innovation and knowledge creation. Cheltenham, 1–23. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781782548522.00006

BBSR – Bundesinstitut für Bau-, Stadt- und Raumforschung; BMUB – Bundesministerium für Umwelt, Naturschutz, Bau und Reaktorsicherheit (2017): Smart City Charta. Digitale Transformation in den Kommunen nachhaltiggestalten. Bonn.

Beer, A.; Ayres, S.; Clower, T.; Faller, F.; Sancino, A.; Sotarauta, M. (2019): Place leadership and regional economic development: A framework for cross-regional analysis. In: Regional Studies 53, 2, 171–182. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2018.1447662

Beer, A.; Clower, T. (2014): Mobilizing leadership in cities and regions. In: Regional Studies, Regional Science 1, 1, 5–20. https://doi.org/10.1080/21681376.2013.869428

Benner, M. (2020): Mitigating human agency in regional development: the behavioural side of policy processes. In: Regional Studies, Regional Science 7, 1, 164–182. https://doi.org/10.1080/21681376.2020.1760732

BMWi – Bundesministerium für Wirtschaft und Energie (ed.) (2021): Digitalisierung in Deutschland – Lehren aus der Corona-Krise. Gutachten desWissenschaftlichen Beirats beim Bundesministerium für Wirtschaft und Energie (BMWi). Berlin.

Bryson, J.M.; Hamilton Edwards, L.; van Slyke, D.M. (2018): Getting strategic about strategic planning research. In: Public Management Review 20, 3, 317–339. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2017.1285111

Budd, L.; Sancino, A. (2016): A framework for city leadership in multilevel governance settings: The comparative contexts of Italy and the UK. In: Regional Studies, Regional Science 3, 1, 129–145. https://doi.org/10.1080/21681376.2015.1125306

Bürgin, R.; Mayer, H. (2020): Digital periphery? A community case study of digitalization efforts in Swiss mountain regions. In: Patnaik, S.; Sen, S.; Mahmoud, M.S. (eds.): Smart Village Technology. Concepts and Developments. Cham, 67–98. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-37794-6_4

Christmann, G.B. (2014): Social Entrepreneurs on the Periphery: Uncovering Emerging Pioneers of Regional Development. In: disP – The Planning Review 50, 1, 43–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/02513625.2014.926725

Christmann, G.B. (2019): Innovationen in ländlichen Gemeinden. In: Nell, W.; Weiland, M. (eds.): Dorf: Ein interdisziplinäres Handbuch. Berlin, 235–240. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-476-05449-4_32

Christmann, G.B. (2020): Introduction: struggling with innovations. Social innovations and conflicts in urban development and planning. In: European Planning Studies 28, 3, 423–433. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2019.1639396

Döringer, S.; Eder, J. (eds.) (2020a): Schlüsselakteure der Regionalentwicklung: Welche Perspektiven bietet Entrepreneurship für ländliche Räume? Wien. = Institut für Stadt- und Regionalforschung, Forschungsberichte 51.

Döringer, S.; Eder, J. (2020b): Vorwort. In: Döringer, S.; Eder, J. (eds.): Schlüsselakteure der Regionalentwicklung: Welche Perspektiven bietet Entrepreneurship für ländliche Räume? Wien, 7–8. = Institut für Stadt- und Regionalforschung, Forschungsberichte 51.

European Commission (2010): Europe 2020: A European strategy for smart, sustainable and inclusive growth. Brussels.

European Commission (2020): Gestaltung der digitalen Zukunft Europas. Brussels. https://ec.europa.eu/info/sites/info/files/communication-shaping-europes-digitalfuture-feb2020_de_0.pdf (22.02.2022).

Faber, K. (2013): Raumpioniere. Vom Bürgerbus bis zur Schulgründung – neue Wege der Daseinsvorsorge in ländlichen Regionen. In: Der Kritische Agrarbericht 2013, 161–164.

Faber, K.; Oswalt, P. (eds.) (2013): Raumpioniere in ländlichen Regionen: Neue Wege der Daseinsvorsorge. Leipzig. = Edition Bauhaus 35.

Gailing, L.; Ibert, O. (2016): Schlüssselfiguren: Raum als Gegenstand und Ressource des Wandels. In: Raumforschung und Raumordnung 74, 5, 391–403. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13147-016-0426-3

Grillitsch, M.; Sotarauta, M. (2020): Trinity of change agency, regional development paths and opportunity spaces. In: Progress in Human Geography 44, 4, 704–723. https//doi.org/10.1177/0309132519853870

Grint, K. (2001): The Arts of Leadership. Oxford. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199244898.001.0001

Grint, K. (2010): Placing leadership. In: Policy Studies 31, 4, 365–366. https://doi.org/10.1080/01442871003723226

Gugerell, K.; Penker, M.; Kieninger, P. (2019):What are participants of cow sharing arrangements actually sharing? A property rights analysis on cow sharing arrangements in the European Alps. In: Land Use Policy 87, 104039. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2019.104039

Hambleton, R.; Howard, J. (2013): Place-based leadership and public service innovation. In: Local Government Studies 39, 1, 47–70. https://doi.org/10.1080/03003930.2012.693076

Howaldt, J.; Schwarz, M. (2010): Soziale Innovation – Konzepte, Forschungsfelder und -perspektiven. In: Howaldt, J.; Jacobsen, H. (eds.): Soziale Innovation. Auf dem Weg zu einem postindustriellen Innovationsparadigma. Wiesbaden, 87–108. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-531-92469-4_5

Hosseini, S.; Frank, L.; Fridgen, G.; Heger, S. (2018): Do not forget about smart towns. How to bring customized digital innovation to rural areas. In: Business and Information Systems Engineering 60, 3, 243–257. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12599-018-0536-2

Hughes, T.P. (1987): The evolution of large technological systems. In: Bijker, W.E.; Hughes, T.P.; Pinch, T.J. (eds.): The social construction of technological systems. New directions in the sociology and history of technology. Cambridge, 51–82.

Jackson, B.; Parry, K.W. (2008): A very short, fairly interesting and reasonably cheap book about studying leadership. London.

Kenyon, W.; Mickelson, A.; Anderson, A. (2016): A testbed for WiLDNet and white space. Paper presented at the IEEE Global Humanitarian Tech. https://doi.org/10.1109/GHTC.2016.7857272

Kitchin, R.; Lauriault, T.P.; McArdle, G. (2016): Smart cities and the politics of urban data. In: Marvin, S.; Luque-Ayala, A.; McFarlane, C. (eds.): Smart Urbanism. Utopian vision or false dawn? London, 7–34.

Küpper, P.; Milbert, A. (2020): Typen ländlicher Räume in Deutschland. In: Krajewski, C.; Wiegand C.-C. (eds.): Land in Sicht: Ländliche Räume in Deutschland zwischen Prosperität und Marginalisierung. Bonn, 82–97.

Marlintha, A.B.; Irawan, B.; Latuconsina, R. (2017): Design and implementation of smart village mapping geographic information system based web in the Cinunuk village. Paper presented at the IEEE Asia Pacific Conference on Wireless and Mobile. https://doi.org/10.1109/APWIMOB.2017.8284006

Matern, A.; Binder, J.; Noack, A. (2020): Smart regions: insights from hybridization and peripheralization research. In: European Planning Studies 28, 10, 2060–2077. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2019.1703910

Matthiesen, U. (2011): Ein Labor für Raumpioniere. Wie Entwicklungsimpulse durch selbst organisierte Mikro-Netze entstehen können. In: Perspektive 21. Brandenburgische Hefte für Wissenschaft und Politik 48, 59–68.

Mayntz, R. (2009): Von politischer Steuerung zu Governance? Überlegungen zur Architektur von Innovationspolitik. In: Mayntz, R. (ed.): Über Governance. Institutionen und Prozesse politischer Regelung. Frankfurt am Main, 105–120.

Meyn, M. (2020): Digitalization and its impact on life in rural areas: exploring the two sides of the Atlantic: USA and Germany. In: Patnaik, S.; Sen, S.; Mahmoud, M.S. (eds.): Smart Village Technology. Concepts and Developments. Cham, 99–116. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-37794-6_5

Mulgan, G. (2019): Social Innovation. How societies find the power to change. Bristol.

Naldi, L.; Nilsson, P.; Westlund, H.; Wixe, S. (2015): What is smart rural development? In: Journal of Rural Studies 40, 90–101. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2015.06.006

Nassehi, A. (2019): Muster. Theorie der digitalen Gesellschaft. München.

Noack, A.; Federwisch, T. (2019): Social innovation in rural regions: Urban impulses and cross-border constellations of actors. In: Sociologia Ruralis 59, 1, 92–112.

Orr, K.; Bennett, M. (2017): Relational Leadership, Storytelling, and Narratives: Practices of Local Government Chief Executives. In: Public Administration Review 77, 4, 515–527. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.12680

Oswalt, P.; Overmeyer, K.; Misselwitz, P. (eds.) (2013): Urban catalysts. Mit Zwischennutzungen Stadt entwickeln. Berlin.

Patnaik, S.; Sen, S.; Mahmoud, M.S. (eds.) (2020): Smart Village Technology. Concepts and Developments. Cham, 99–116. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-37794-6

Porsche, L. (2021): Kleinstädte – digital, smart oder intelligent? In: Steinführer, A.; Porsche, L.; Sondermann, M. (eds.): Kompendium Kleinstadtforschung. Hannover, 155–176. = Forschungsberichte der ARL 16.

Rodríguez Bolívar, M.P.; Meijer, A.J. (2016): Smart Governance: Using a literature review and empirial analysis to build a research model. In: Social Science Computer Review 34, 6, 673–692. https://doi.org/10.1177/0894439315611088

Rose, G. (2017): Posthuman agency in the digitally mediated city: Exteriorization, individuation, reinvention. In: Annals of the American Association of Geographers 107, 4, 779–793. https://doi.org/10.1080/24694452.2016.1270195

Rundel, C.; Salemink, K. (2021): Bridging digital inequalities in rural schools in Germany: a geographical lottery? In: Education Sciences 11, 4, 181. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci11040181

Salemink, K.; Strijker, D.; Bosworth, G. (2017): Rural development in the digital age: A systematic literature review on unequal ICT availability, adoption, and use in rural areas. In: Journal of Rural Studies 54, 360–371. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2015.09.001

Sancino, A.; Hudson, L. (2020): Leadership in, of and for smart cities – Case studies from Europe, America, and Australia. In: Public Management Review 22, 5, 701–725. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2020.1718189

Senatsverwaltung für Stadtentwicklung (ed.) (2007): Urban Pioneers. Berlin.

Sotarauta, M. (2017): An actor-centric bottom-up view of institutions: Combinational knowledge dynamics through the eyes of institutional entrepreneurs and institutional navigators. In: Environment and Planning C: Politics and Space 35, 4, 584–599. https://doi.org/10.1177/0263774X16664906

Sotarauta, M.; Beer, A.; Gibney, J. (2017): Making Sense of Leadership in Urban and Regional Development. In: Regional Studies 51, 2, 187–193. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2016.1267340

Tama, J. (2017): The politics of strategy: Why government agencies conduct major strategic reviews. In: Journal of Public Policy 37, 1, 27–54. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0143814X15000148

Uyarra, E.; Flanagan, K.; Magro, E.; Wilson, J.R.; Sotarauta, M. (2017): Understanding regional innovation policy dynamics: Actors, agency and learning. In: Environment and Planning C: Politics and Space 35, 4, 559–568. https://doi.org/10.1177/2399654417705914

Vitale Brovarone, E.; Cotella, G.; Staricco, L. (2021): Rural accessibility in European Regions. Exploring uncharted territory. In: Vitale Brovarone, E.; Cotella, G.; Staricco, L. (eds.): Rural accessibility in European Regions. New York, 1–20. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003083740-1

Vuppalapati, J.S.; Kedari, S.; Ilapakurthy, A.; Vuppalapati, C. (2017): Smart Diaries – Enablement of Smart City at gross root level. Paper presented at the IEEE Third International Conference on Big Data Computing Service and Applications (BigDataService). https://doi.org/10.1109/BigDataService.2017.35

Wiechmann, T.; Terfrüchte, T. (2017): Smart Country regional gedacht – Teilräumliche Analysen für digitale Strategien in Deutschland. Gütersloh.

Williger, B.; Wojtech, A. (2018): Digitalisierung im ländlichen Raum. Status Quo & Chancen für Gemeinden.Nürnberg.

Zavratnik, V.; Kos, A.; Stojmenova Duh, E. (2018): Smart Villages: Comprehensive Review of Initiatives and Practices. In: Sustainability 10, 7, 2559. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10072559

Zerrer, N.; Sept, A. (2020): Smart Villagers as Actors of Digital Social Innovation in Rural Areas. In: Urban Planning 5, 4, 78–88. https://doi.org/10.17645/up.v5i4.3183