Explaining Metropolitan Governance. The Case of Spain

Mariona Tomàs

doi:10.1007/s13147-016-0445-0

Authors

Mariona Tomàs Department of Constitutional Law and Political Science, University of Barcelona, Avda. Diagonal 690, 08034, Barcelona, Spain

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1007/s13147-016-0445-0

Keywords:

Metropolitan governance, Spain, Metropolitanization, Institutions, Local government

Abstract

In this paper I examine the characteristics of metropolitan governance in Spain. In the first part, I briefly analyse the different theoretical conceptions and the existing models of metropolitan governance in Europe. I argue that metropolitan governance is explained by the interrelations between the specific institutional context (intergovernmental system) and political culture (attitudes towards metropolitan cooperation). This institutional milieu sets the conditions for the action of political actors and favours the existence of a specific model of metropolitan governance. In the second part, I study the case of Spain, which is interesting for two main reasons. First, it exemplifies well one of the problems of metropolitan governance: the permanent gap between institutions and the process of metropolitanization. Second, in Spain there is a diversity of models of metropolitan governance, which is useful to analyse the reasons for this variation. To do so, I focus on five urban areas (Madrid, Barcelona, Valencia, Bilbao and Sevilla), analysing their models of metropolitan governance and particularly their degree of institutionalization and the type of institutional arrangements that have been made.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Aja, E. (2007): El Estado Autonómico. Federalismo y hechos diferenciales. Madrid.

Alba, C.; Navarro, C. (2005): Metropolitan Areas in Spain, a diverse and unknown reality. In: Hoffmann-Martinot, V.; Sellers, J. (eds.): Metropolitanization and Political Change. Wiesbaden, 265-293.

Almoguera Sallent, M.P. (2008): La Ciudad cambia de escala: Sevilla Metropolitana. Sevilla.

Bish, R.L.; Ostrom, V. (1973): Understanding Urban Government. Metropolitan Reform Reconsidered. Washington, D.C.

Espasa Queralt, M.; Bosch Roca, N. (2006): La hisenda local a la Unió europea (UE-15). Barcelona.

Brenner, N. (2002): Decoding the newest “Metropolitan Regionalism” in the USA: A critical overview. In: Cities 19, 1, 3 21.

DiGaetano, A.; Strom, E. (2003): Comparative Urban Governance: An Integrated Approach. In: Urban Affairs Review 38, 3, 356-395.

Eurostat (2014): Eurostat Regional Yearbook 2014. Luxembourg.

Heinelt, H.; Kübler, D. (eds.) (2005): Metropolitan governance. Capacity, democracy and the dynamics of place. London.

Heinelt, H.; Zimmermann, K. (2011): How Can We Explain Diversity in Metropolitan Governance within a Country? Some Reflections on Recent Developments in Germany. In: International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 35, 6, 1175-1192.

Hesse, J.J.; Sharpe, L.J. (1991): Local government in international perspective: some comparative observations. In: Hesse, J.J. (ed.): Local government and urban affairs in international perspective. Baden-Baden, 603-621.

Kübler, D.; Wälti, S. (2001): Metropolitan governance and democracy: how to evaluate new tendencies? In: McLaverty, P. (ed.): Public participation and innovations in community governance. Aldershot, 115-140.

Lefèvre, C. (1998): Metropolitan government and governance in western countries: A critical review. In: International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 22, 1, 9 25.

Lefèvre, C. (2009): Gouverner les métropoles. Paris.

Ministry of Public Administration (2015): Register of Local Entities. Madrid.

Moreno, L. (2008): La federalización de España. Poder político y territorio. Madrid.

Moriconi-Ebrard, F. (1993): L’urbanisation du monde depuis 1950. Paris.

Mossberger, K.; Stoker, G. (2001): The Evolution of Urban Regime Theory. The Challenge of Conceptualization. In: Urban Affairs Review 36, 6, 810-835.

Paasi, A. (2003): Region and Place: Regional Identity in Question. In: Progress in Human Geography 27, 4, 475-485.

Pierre, J. (1999): Models of urban governance. The institutional dimension of urban politics. In: Urban Affairs Review 34, 3, 372-396.

Rodríguez Álvarez, J.M. (2002): Madrid: le pilotage politique par la région. In: Jouve, B.; Lefèvre, C. (eds.): Métropoles ingouvernables. Paris, 107-124.

Sancton, A. (2001): Canadian Cities and the New Regionalism. In: Journal of Urban Affairs 23, 5, 543-555.

Savitch, H.V.; Vogel, R.K. (2000): Paths to new regionalism. In: State and Local Government Review 32, 3, 158-168.

Savitch, H.V.; Vogel, R.K. (2009): Regionalism and urban politics. In: Davies, J.S.; Imbroscio, D.L. (eds.): Theories of urban politics. London, 106-124.

Sharpe, L.J. (ed.) (1995): The Government of World Cities: the Future of the Metro Model. London.

Swanstrom, T. (2001): What we argue about when we argue about regionalism. In: Journal of Urban Affairs 23, 5, 479-496.

Tiebout, C.M. (1956): A pure theory of local expenditures. In: Journal of Political Economy 64, 5, 416-424.

Tomàs, M. (2011): La escala metropolitana: un análisis transversal. In: Iglesias, M.; Martí-Costa, M.; Subirats, J.; Tomàs, M. (eds.): Políticas urbanas en Espana. Grandes ciudades, actores y gobiernos locales. Barcelona, 283-306.

Tomàs, M. (2015a): Metropolitan governance in Europe: Challenges and Models. Barcelona.

Tomàs, M. (2015b): If urban regions are the answer, what is the question? Thoughts on the European experience. In: International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 39, 2, 382-389.