Metropolitan Colours of Europeanization. Institutionalization of Integrated Territorial Investment Structures in the Context of Past Cooperation in Metropolitan Regions

Authors

  • Joanna Krukowska Department of Local Development and Policy, Faculty of Geography and Regional Studies, University of Warsaw, ul. Krakowskie Przedmieście 30, 00-927, Warsaw, Poland
  • Marta Lackowska Department of Local Development and Policy, Faculty of Geography and Regional Studies, University of Warsaw, ul. Krakowskie Przedmieście 30, 00-927, Warsaw, Poland

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1007/s13147-016-0447-y

Keywords:

Europeanization, Metropolitan governance, Intermunicipal cooperation, Integrated Territorial Investment, Poland

Abstract

The paper focuses on the institutional solutions adopted in various Polish metropolitan regions due to the requirement to create structures facilitating the operation of Integrated Territorial Investment (ITI) in the 2014–2020 EU financial perspective. This phenomenon is analysed in the light of the process of the launching and functioning of metropolitan cooperation and of the concept of Europeanization. Our considerations are based on the assumption that past attempts to institutionalize metropolitan cooperation influence the process of the creation and functioning of ITI cooperation. Our research has confirmed this proposition. We found various reactions to the top-down incentive in all of the investigated metropolitan regions. In general four main types of situation are identified depending on past metropolitan cooperation and its relation to the ITI institutions. On the national level an interesting “double top-down” pressure was discovered, as the EU guidelines have been made much stricter by the Polish government, turning an incentive for local actors into a must. Finally, Integrated Territorial Investment has enlivened metropolitan governance in Poland, which is interesting to follow in the future, especially as it has no connection to other national regulations proposed for metropolitan regions.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Atkinson, R.; Rossignolo, C. (eds.) (2008): The Re-Creation of the European City: Governance, Territory and Polycentricity. Amsterdam.

Axelrod, R.M. (1984): The Evolution of Cooperation. New York.

Bache, I. (2008): Europeanization and multilevel governance. Cohesion policy in the European Union and Britain. Lanham.

Barca, F. (2009): An agenda for a reformed Cohesion Policy. A place-based approach to meeting European Union challenges and expectations. Brussels.

Börzel, T.A. (1999): Towards Convergence in Europe? Institutional Adaptation to Europeanization in Germany and Spain. In: Journal of Common Market Studies 37, 4, 573–596.

Brenner, N. (2004): New State Spaces. Urban Governance and the Rescaling of Statehood. Oxford, New York.

Council of European Municipalities and Regions (2014): Cohesion Policy: The use of Integrated Territorial Investments (ITI) by Member States. http://www.ccre.org/img/uploads/piecesjointe/filename/CEMR_survey_on_Integrated_Territorial_Investments_2014_EN.pdf (August 10, 2016).

European Commission (2014): Integrated Territorial Investment: Cohesion Policy 2014–2020. Brussels. http://ec.europa.eu/regional_policy/sources/docgener/informat/2014/iti_en.pdf (August 22, 2016).

Flockhart, T. (2010): Europeanization or EU-ization? The Transfer of European Norms across Time and Space. In: Journal of Common Market Studies 48, 4, 787–810.

Frankowski, J.; Szmytkowska, M. (2015): Regionalne zróżnicowanie nowych partnerstw miejskich w Polsce. In: Zarządzanie Publiczne 30, 2, 131–150.

Goldsmith, M. (2005): The experience of metropolitan government in England. In: Heinelt, H.; Kübler, D. (eds.): Metropolitan Governance. Capacity, democracy and the dynamics of place. Abingdon, 81–99.

Grosse, T. (2009): Europeizacja administracji – nowe metody zarządzania w nowych państwach członkowskich Unii Europejskiej. In: Kolarska-Bobińska, L. (ed.): Nowe metody zarządzania w państwach Unii Europejskiej. Warsaw, 101–132.

Hamedinger, A.; Wolffhardt, A. (eds.) (2010): The Europeanization of Cities: Policies, Urban Change and Urban Networks. Amsterdam.

Heinelt, H.; Razin, E.; Zimmermann, K. (eds.) (2011): Metropolitan Governance. Different Paths in Contrasting Contexts: Germany and Israel. Frankfurt am Main.

Heinelt, H.; Kübler, D. (eds.): Metropolitan Governance. Capacity, democracy and the dynamics of place. Abingdon.

Heinelt, H.; Niederhafner, S. (2008): Cities and organized interest intermediation in the EU multi-level system. In: European Urban and Regional Studies 15, 2, 173–187.

Hooghe, L.; Marks, G. (2001) Multi-level Governance and European Integration. Lanham.

Howes, S.; Otor, S.; Rogers, C. (2011): Is there a micro-macro paradox in international aid, or do the data deceive? https://devpolicy.anu.edu.au/pdf/2011/20110207/ppp/Cate_Rogers_paper.pdf (July 29, 2016).

Ignasiak-Szulc, A.; Jaźwiński, I. (2015): Pozycja ustrojowa samorządu województwa w kontekście jego roli w polityce rozwoju w Polsce. In: Pancer-Cybulska, E.; Szostak, E. (eds.): Unia Europejska 10 lat po największy rozszerzeniu. Wrocław, 356–367. = Prace naukowe Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego we Wrocławiu 380.

Jakubowska, M. (2014): Metropolitalna współpraca samorządowa wokół “nieoczywistych” metropolii. Master thesis, University of Warsaw, Faculty of Geography and Regional Studies.

Kaczmarek, T.; Mikuła, Ł. (2007): Ustroje terytorialno-administracyjne obszarów metropolitalnych w Europie. Poznań.

Kohler-Koch, B. (1999): The Evolution and Transformation of European Governance. In: Kohler-Koch, B.; Eising, R. (eds.): The Transformation of Governance in the European Union. London, 13–34.

Kołsut B. (2015): Zinstytucjonalizowane sieci współdziałania międzygminnego w Polsce. Poznań.

Kozak, M. (2015): Podsumowanie cyklu spotkań ws. ZIT: wnioski i rekomendacje dotyczące Strategii ZIT. Presentation at the workshop concerning implementation of the ITI instrument in Poland, Zakopane, January 20, 2015.

Krukowska, J. (2014): Zróżnicowanie polityk rozwojowych realizowanych za pomocą Regionalnych Programów Operacyjnych 2007–2013. Ph.D. thesis, University of Warsaw, Faculty of Geography and Regional Studies.

Kübler, D.; Heinelt, H. (2005): Metropolitan governance, democracy and the dynamics of place. In: Heinelt, H.; Kübler, D. (eds.): Metropolitan Governance, capacity, democracy and the dynamics of place. Abingdon, 8–28.

Kulesza, M. (2006): Zarządzanie metropolią. In: Pomorski Przegląd Gospodarczy 28, 5, 34–37.

Lackowska, M. (2009): Zarządzanie obszarami metropolitalnymi. Warsaw.

Lackowska, M. (2014): Miejska polityka “zagraniczna”. Koncepcja przeskalowania w doświadczeniach polskich miast. Warsaw.

Lackowska M.; Norris, D.F. (2014): Metropolitan governance (or not!) in Poland and the United States. Presentation at the conference “City Futures III”, Paris, June 18–20, 2014.

Lackowska, M.; Swianiewicz, P. (2013): Dwuszczeblowe struktury zarządzania obszarami metropolitalnymi w Europie. In: Samorząd Terytorialny 4, 5–21.

Lodge, M. (2006): The Europeanisation of Governance – top down, bottom up or both? In: Schuppert, G.F. (ed.): The Europeanisation of Governance. Baden-Baden, 59–76.

Marks, G.; Hooghe, L. (2004): Contrasting visions of multi-level governance. In: Bache, I.; Flinders, M. (eds.): Multi-level governance. Oxford, 15–30.

Ministry of Regional Development (2013): Zasady realizacji Zintegrowanych InwestycjiTerytorialnych w Polsce. Warsaw.

Négrier, M. (2005): The new French dice: metropolitan institution building democratic issues. In: Heinelt, H.; Kübler, D. (eds.): Metropolitan Governance. Capacity, democracy and the dynamics of place. Abingdon, 29–46

Olewiński, A. (2015): Bydgoszcz godzi się na ZIT z Toruniem tylko na swoich warunkach. http://nowosci.com.pl/302815,Bydgoszcz-godzi-sie-na-ZIT-z-Toruniem-tylko-na-swoich-warunkach.html (July 29, 2016).

Orton, J.D.; Weick, K.F. (1990): Loosely Coupled Systems: A Reconceptualization. In: The Academy of Management Review 15, 2, 203–223.

Radaelli, C.M. (2003): The Europeanization of Public Policy. In: Featherstone, K.; Radaelli, C.M. (eds.): The Politics of Europeanization. Oxford, 27–56.

Risse, T.; Cowles, M.G.; Caporaso, J.A. (2001): Europeanization and Domestic Change: Introduction. In: Cowles, M.G.; Caporaso, J.A.; Risse, T. (eds.): Transforming Europe. Europeanization and Domestic Change. Ithaca, London, 1–20.

Sagan, I. (2000): Miasto. Scena konfliktów i współpracy. Gdańsk.

Sagan, I.; Canowiecki, Z. (2011): Między integracją a konkurencją. Gdańsko-Gdyński Obszar Metropolitalny. Warsaw.

Swianiewicz, P. (2006): Zarządzanie obszarami metropolitalnymi – doświadczenia międzynarodowe a rzeczywistość polska. In: Samorząd Terytorialny 1–2, 29–43.

Swianiewicz, P.; Krukowska, J.; Lackowska, M. (2013): Profesjonalizacja absorpcji funduszy: beneficjenci samorządowi centralnie zarządzanych programów operacyjnych w okresie 2007–2013. Warsaw.

Szmigiel-Rawska, K.; Dołzbłasz, S. (2012): Trwałość współpracy przygranicznej. Warsaw.

Uusikyla, P. (2009): Making sound judgements about the effects of public policies. How to explore the missing links between the cause and effect? http://ec.europa.eu/regional_policy/archive/conferences/evaluation2009/pres/ws3_uusikyla_paper.pdf (July 29, 2016).

Zarycki, T. (2002): Region jako kontekst zachowań politycznych. Warsaw.

Downloads

Published

2017-06-30

How to Cite

1.
Krukowska J, Lackowska M. Metropolitan Colours of Europeanization. Institutionalization of Integrated Territorial Investment Structures in the Context of Past Cooperation in Metropolitan Regions. RuR [Internet]. 2017 Jun. 30 [cited 2024 Apr. 20];75(3):275–289. Available from: https://rur.oekom.de/index.php/rur/article/view/456