Regionale ökonomische Resilienz: Eine schumpeterianische Perspektive

Autor/innen

  • James Simmie Department of Planning, Headington Campus, Oxford Brookes University, Gipsy Lane, Oxford, OX3 0BP, UK

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1007/s13147-014-0274-y

Schlagwörter:

Regional resilience, Schumpeterian business cycles, North East and South East England, Regional adaptation

Abstract

This paper takes up the Schumpeterian argument that innovations drive economic recovery following cyclical phases of recession and depression. The performance of the regional innovation systems of two contrasting regions in England is examined in the light of this argument. It is shown that the long-term development of the regions’ respective innovation systems contributed significantly to the long-run adaptation and consequential economic resilience of their economies in the face of periodic external economic shocks. It is also argued that regional innovation systems policies can contribute to the adaptation of regional economies and therefore their economic resilience.

Downloads

Download-Daten sind nocht nicht verfügbar.

Literaturhinweise

Bahadur, A.V.; Ibrahim, M.; Tanner, T. (2010): The Resilience Renaissance? Unpacking of Resilience for Tackling Climate Change and Disasters. Brighton. = Strengthening Climate Resilience Discussion Paper 1.

Breschi, S.; Malerba, F. (1997): Sectoral innovation systems: Technological regimes, Schumpeterian dynamics, and spatial boundaries. In: Edquist, C. (ed.): Systems of Innovation: Technologies, Institutions and Organizations. London/Washington, 130–156.

Callon, M. (1992): The dynamics of techno-economic networks. In: Coombs, R.; Saviotti, P.; Walsh, V. (eds.): Technological change and company strategies: Economic and sociological perspectives. San Diego, 72–102.

Carlsson, B.; Stankiewicz, R. (1991): On the nature, function and composition of technological systems. In: Journal of Evolutionary Economics 1 (2), 93–118.

Cooke, P.; Gomez Uranga, M.; Etxebarria, G. (1997): Regional innovation systems: Institutional and organisational dimensions. In: Research Policy 26 (4–5), 475–491.

Cooke, P.; Heidenreich, M.; Braczyk, H.-J. (eds.) (2004): Regional Innovation Systems. The Role of Governance in a Globalized World. London.

Cross, R. (1993): On the foundations of hysteresis in economic systems. In: Economics and Philosophy 9 (1), 53–74.

Cross, R.; Allen, A. (1988): On the history of hysteresis. In Cross, R. (ed.): Unemployment, Hysteresis and the Natural Rate Hypothesis. Oxford, 26–39.

Edquist, C. (1997) (ed.): Systems of Innovation: Technologies, Institutions and Organizations. London/Washington.

Edquist, C. (2005): Systems of innovation: perspectives and challenges. In: Fagerberg, J.; Mowery, D.; Nelson, R. (eds.): The Oxford Handbook of Innovation. Oxford, 181–208.

Elster, J. (1976): A note on hysteresis in the social sciences. In: Synthese 33 (2/4), 371–391.

Freeman, C. (1987): Technology Policy and Economic Performance. London.

Friedman, M. (1993): The “plucking model” of business fluctuations revisited. In: Economic Inquiry 31 (2), 171–177.

Gardiner, B.; Martin, R.L.; Sunley, P.J.; Tyler, P. (2012): Regional Resilience and Economic Structure. Paper presented at the Regional Studies Association Conference, University of Delft, May 2012.

Gardiner, B.; Martin, R.L.; Sunley, P.J.; Tyler, P. (2013): Spatially Unbalanced Growth in the British Economy. Presentation to conference on Local Economic Growth: Recession, Resilience and Recovery 11th-12th July 2013, McGrath Centre, St Catharine’s College, Cambridge.

Georgescu-Roegen, N. (1966): Analytical Economics: Issues and Problems. Cambridge, MA.

Göcke, M. (2002): Various concepts of hysteresis applied in economics. In: Journal of Economic Surveys 16 (2), 167–188.

Hughes, T.P. (1984): Networks of Power: Electrification in Western Society, 1880–1930. Baltimore.

Kim, C.-J.; Nelson, C.R. (1999): Friedman’s plucking model of business fluctuations: tests and estimates of permanent and transitory components. In: Journal of Money, Credit and Banking 31 (3), 317–334.

Lundvall, B-Å. (ed.) (1992): National Systems of Innovation: Towards a Theory of Innovation and Interactive Learning. London.

Malerba, F. (2002): Sectoral systems of innovation and production. In: Research Policy 31 (2), 247–264.

Markusen, A. (2003): Fuzzy Concepts, Scanty Evidence, Policy Distance: The Case for Rigour and Policy Relevance in Critical Regional Studies. In: Regional Studies 37 (6–7), 701–717.

Martin, R.L. (2011): Regional competitiveness: from endowments to externalities to evolution. In: Cooke, P.; Asheim, B.; Boschma, R.; Martin, R.; Schwartz, D.; Tödtling, F. (eds.): Handbook of Regional Innovation and Growth. Cheltenham, 234–245.

Martin, R.L. (2012): Regional Economic Resilience, Hysteresis and Recessionary Shocks. In: Journal of Economic Geography 12 (1), 1–32.

Martin, R.L.; Sunley, P.J. (2007): Complexity Thinking and Evolutionary Economic Geography. In: Journal of Economic Geography 7 (5), 573–601.

Nauwelears, C. (2011): Intermediaries in regional innovation systems: role and challenges for policy. In: Cooke, P.; Asheim, B.; Boschma, R.; Martin, R.; Schwartz, D.; Tödtling, F. (eds.): Handbook of Regional Innovation and Growth. Cheltenham, 467–481.

Nelson, R.R.; Winter, S.G. (1982): An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change. Cambridge/London.

Pearce, G.; Ayres, S. (2009): Governance in the English Regions: The Role of the Regional Development Agencies. In: Urban Studies 46 (3), 537–557.

Perry, B. (2007): The Multi-level Governance of Science Policy in England. In: Regional Studies 41 (8), 1051–1067.

Pilat, D.; Lee, F.; van Ark, B. (2002): Production and Use of ICT: A Sectoral Perspective on Productivity Growth in the OECD Area. Paris. = OECD Economic Studies 35.

Romer, R. (2001): Advanced Macroeconomics. Boston.

Schumpeter, J.A. (1939): Business Cycles: A theoretical, historical and statistical analysis of the capitalist process. New York.

Schumpeter, J.A. (1942): Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy. New York.

Setterfield, M. (2010): Hysteresis. Hartford, Connecticut. = Working Paper 10–04, Department of Economics, Trinity College.

Soete, L.; Verspagen, B.; ter Weel, B. (2009): Systems of Innovation. Maastricht. = Working Paper #2009–062, United Nations University, UNU-Merit.

Solow, R.M. (1956): A Contribution to the Theory of Economic Growth. In: The Quarterly Journal of Economics 70 (1), 65–94.

Solow, R.M. (1957): Technical Change and the Aggregate Production Function. In: Review of Economics and Statistics 39 (3), 312–320.

Swan, T.W. (1956): Economic Growth and Capital Accumulation. In: Economic Record 32 (2), 334–361.

Witt, U. (1997): “Lock-in” vs. “critical masses”—Industrial change under network externalities. In: International Journal of Industrial Organization 15 (6), 753–773.

Witt, U. (2003): The Evolving Economy. Cheltenham.

Downloads

Veröffentlicht

2014-04-30

Ausgabe

Bd. 72 Nr. 2 (2014)

Rubrik

Forschungsbeitrag

Lizenz

Copyright (c) 2014 RuR Editors

Creative Commons License

This work is re-published by oekom 2022 under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Artikel in Raumforschung und Raumordnung - Spatial Research and Planing werden unter einer Creative Commons Lizenz  veröffentlicht. Seit Jahrgang 79, Ausgabe 2, erfolgt die Veröffentlichung im Lizenzmodell  CC BY 4.0 (Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License). Von Jahrgang 77 Ausgabe 1 bis Jahrgang 79 Ausgabe 1 wurden alle Artikel unter einer CC BY-SA-Lizenz veröffentlicht. Frühere Jahrgänge wurden von oekom 2022 unter the Lizenz CC BY 4.0 wiederveröffentlicht.

Zitierweise

1.
Simmie J. Regionale ökonomische Resilienz: Eine schumpeterianische Perspektive. RuR [Internet]. 30. April 2014 [zitiert 15. August 2026];72(2):103–116. Verfügbar unter: https://rur.oekom.de/index.php/rur/article/view/639

Teilen