Innovationsförderung durch die EU-Strukturpolitik nach 2007: neue Ansätze, alte Probleme? Autor/innen Rüdiger Wink Ruhr Forschungsinstitut für Innovations- und Strukturpolitik e.V., Ruhr Universität Bochum, GC 3/154, 44780, Bochum FB Wirtschaft, HTWK Leipzig, Postfach 301166, 04251, Leipzig DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03183019 Abstract This paper deals with options, prerequisites and planned activities to foster innovation promotion as a major instrument of EU structural funds. Due to its dependence on a specific density of agglomeration and interactions between firms, research institutes, universities, public administration and specialised intermediaries, regional innovation systems (RIS) and clusters seem to be a very promising instrument to improve the competitiveness of regions and their citizens, firms and other organizations. However, only few regions are able to implement a strategy of RIS or clusters successfully, causing additional risks of increasing disparities between economically leading and lagging regions. The plans of the European Commission for the next budget period including further instruments to promote innovation are investigated and assessed critically, and within conclusions, an argumentation is presented, why promotion of innovation will never contribute in the intensity intended by the European Commission to EU regional policy. Downloads Download-Daten sind nocht nicht verfügbar. Literaturhinweise Acs, Z.J.: Innovation and the Growth of Cities. — Cheltenham 2002 Alecke, B. et al.: Are there really high-tech cluster? The geographic concentration of German manufacturing industries and its determinants. Annals of Regional Science 40 (2006), S. 19–42 Asheim, B.T.; Coenen, L.: Knowledge bases and regional innovation systems: Comparing Nordic Clusters. Research Policy 34 (2005), S. 1173–1190 Bathelt, H.; Malmberg, A.; Maskell, P.: Clusters and knowledge: local buzz, global pipelines and the process of knowledge creation. Progress in Human Geography 28 (2004), S. 31–56 Baumgart, K.: Einzel- und volkswirtschaftliche Auswirkungen effizienter Wissensnutzung. Eine institutionenökonomische Analyse. — Wiesbaden 2002 Belussi, F.; Sedita, S.R.: Learning at the boundaries in industrial districts (ID) through communities-of-practice and networks. In: Industrial Districts, Relocation and the Governance of the Global Value Chain. Hrsg.: Belussi, F.; Sammara, A. — Padova 2005, S. 37–55 Benzler, G.; Wink, R.: Managing changes to integrative technologies — the case of biophotonics. Internat. Journ. of Learning and Change 1 (2005), S. 11–27 Benzler, G.; Wink, R.: Gezielte Förderung von Innovationspolen. Der Schlüssel zu mehr Wachstum in Deutschland? List Forum f. Finanz- und Wirtschaftspolitik 30 (2004), S. 239–256 Boschma, R.A.: Proximity and innovation: a critical assessment. Regional Studies 39 (2005), S. 61–73 Bottazzi; G.; Dosi, G.; Fagiolo, G.: On the ubiquitous nature of agglomeration economies and their diverse determinants: some notes. In: Complexity and industrial clusters. Dynamics and models in theory and practice. Hrsg.: Quadrio Curzo, A.; Fortis, M.. — Heidelberg 2002 Bush, V.: Science The Endless Frontier. A Report to the President. — Washington, DC 1945 Castellaci, F.: Theoretical convergence? A critical review of evolutionary and new growth theories. Journ. of Economic Surveys (im Erscheinen) Cooke, P.: Regional innovation barriers and the rise of boundary crossing institutions. In: Academia-Business Links. European policies and lessons learnt. Hrsg.: Wink, R.. — Houndmills 2004, S. 223–242 Cooke, P., De Laurentis, C, Tödtling, F., Trippl, M.: Regional Knowledge Economies. — Cheltenham 2006 Cooke, P.; Heidenreich, M.; Braczyk, H. (Hrsg.): Regional Innovation Systems. — 2. Aufl., London 2003 Dupont, V.; Martin, P.: Subsidies to poor regions and inequalities: some unpleasant arithmetic. Journ. of Economic Geography 6 (2006), S. 223–240 Dupuy C; Torre A.: Local Clusters, trust, confidence and proximity. In: Clusters and Globalisation: The Development of Urban and Regional Economies. Hrsg.: Christos, P.; Sugden, R.; Wilson, J. — Cheltenham 2006 Eickelpasch, A.; Fritsch, M.: Contests for cooperation — A new approach in German innovation policy. Research Policy 34 (2005), S. 1269–1289 Etzkowitz, H.; Leydesdorff, L.: The dynamics of innovation: from National Systems and Mode 2 to a Triple Helix of university-industry-government relations. Research Policy 29 (2000), S. 109–123 Eurobarometer: Innobarometer on cluster’s role in facilitating innovation in Europe, Analytical Report. — Brüssel 2006 Europäische Kommission: Statistiken über Wissenschaft und Technologie. Daten 1991–2001. — Luxemburg 2003 Europäische Kommission: Regionen: Statistisches Jahrbuch 2006, Daten 2000–2004. — Luxemburg 2006 European Commission: Cohesion Policy in support of growth a Clusters and Globalisation: The Development of Urban and Regional Economies nd jobs: community strategic guidelines 2007–2013, COM (2005), 299. — Brüssel 2005 European Commission: Innovation in the National Strategic Reference Frameworks. Working Document of the DG Regional Policy. — Brüssel 2006a European Commission: The Growth and Jobs Strategy and the Reform of European cohesion policy. Fourth report on economic and social cohesion. — Brüssel 2006b European Commission: Innovative strategies and actions. Results from 15 years of experimentation. Working Document of the DG Regional Policy. — Brüssel 2006c Fujita, M., Thisse, J.-E: Economics of Agglomeration. Cities, Industrial Location, and Regional Growth. — Cambridge 2002 Gibbons, M. ; Limoges, C. et al. : The New Production of Knowledge: The Dynamics of Science and Research in Contemporary Societies. — London 1994 Giuliani, E.: The structure of cluster knowledge networks: uneven and selective, not pervasive and collective. — Copenhagen 2005 Grossman, J., Reid, P.; Morgan, R.: Contributions of Academic Research to Industrial Performance in five Industry Sectors. Journ. of Technology Transfer 26 (2001), S. 143–152 Harhoff, D.; Henkel, J.; van Hippel, E.: Profiting from voluntary information spillovers: how users benefit by freely revealing their innovations. Research Policy 32 (2003), S. 1753–1769 Harmaakorpi, V.; Melkas, H.: Knowledge management in regional innovation systems: The case of Lahti, Finland. European Planning Studies 13 (2005), S. 641–659 Hassink, R.: How to unlock regional economies from path dependencies? From learning region to learning cluster. European Planning Studies 13 (2005), S. 521–535 Hassink, R.; Hülz, M.: Debating the paradox of interregional institutional learning processes. — Oslo 2006 Henderson, R.; Orsenigo, L.; Pisano, G.: The Pharmaceutical Industry and the Revolution in Molecular Biology: Interactions among Scientific, Institutional and Organisational Change. In: Sources of Industrial Leadership. Hrsg.: Mowery, D.; Nelson, R. — Cambridge 1999, S. 43–64 Iammarino, S.; McCann, P.: The structure and evolution of industrial clusters: transactions, technology and knowledge spillovers. Research Policy 35 (2006), S. 1018–1036 Isard, W.: Location and the Space Economy. — New York 1956 Karl, H.; Wink, R.: Innovation Policy and Federalism. The German Case. Internat. Journ. of Foresight and Innovation Policy 2 (2006), S. 265–284 Krugman, P.: What’s new about the ‚New Economic Geography’? Oxford Review of Economic Policy 14 (1998), S. 7–17 Legier, H. et al.: Innovationsindikatoren zur technologischen Leistungsfähigkeit der östlichen Bundesländer. — Bonn 2003 Leonardi, R.: Cohesion in the European Union. Regional Studies 40 (2006), S. 155–166 Liyanage, S.; Wink, R.; Nordberg, M.: Managing path-breaking innovations. — New York 2007 Maggioni, M.A.; Uberti, T.E.: Inter-regional knowledge flows in Europe: an econometric analysis. In: Applied Evolutionary Economics and Economic Geography. Hrsg.: Frenken, K. — Cheltenham 2007 Martin, R.; Sunley, P.: Deconstructing clusters: chaotic concept or political panacea? Journal of Economic Geography 3 (2003), S. 5–35 Martin, R.; Sunley, P.: Path dependence and regional economic evolution. Journ. of Economic Geography 6 (2006), S. 395–437 McMillan, G.S.; Narin, F.; Deeds, D.L.: An Analysis of the Critical Role of Public Science in Innovation: The Case of Biotechnology. Research Policy 29 (2000), S. 1–8 Niebuhr, A.: Migration and Innovation. Does cultural diversity matter for regional R&D activity? — Hamburg 2006 OECD — Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development: Cities and regions in the new learning economy. — Paris 2001 OECD — Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development: Education Policy Analysis: Focus on Higher Education. — Paris 2006 Perroux, F.: Notes sur la Notion de la ‚pôle de croissance’. Économie Appliquée 7 (1955), S. 307–320 Polt, W. et al.: Benchmarking Industry-Science Relations — The Role of Framework Conditions. — Mannheim, Wien 2001 Poon, J.P.H.; Hsu, J.Y.; Jeongwook, S.: The geography of learning and knowledge acquisition among Asian latecomers. Journ. of Economic Geography 6 (2006), S. 541–559 Schibany, A.; Streicher, G.: The Way to Lisbon — A Critical Assessment. — Graz 2005 Schröer, S.; Straubhaar, T.: Demographische Entwicklung: Problem oder Phantom? — Hamburg 2006 Technopolis et al.: Strategic evaluation on innovation and the knowledge based economy in relation to the structural and cohesion funds, for the programming period 2007–2013. A report to the European Commission, DG Regional Policy. — Brüssel 2006 Tsipouri, L.; Reid, A.; Arundel, A.; Hollanders, H.: European Innovation Progress Report 2006. Report for the European Commision, DG Enterprise and Industry. — Brüssel 2006 UNCTAD — United Nations Conference on Trade and Development: Trade and Development Report 2005. New Features of Global Interdependence. — Genf 2005 Wink, R.: Die Rolle der Nachfrage im Innovationsprozess. Eine evolutorisch-institutionenökonomische Perspektive. In: Wissenschaft und Technik in theoretischer Reflexion. Hrsg.: Parthey, H.; Spur, G. — Frankfurt/M. 2007a, S. 99–124 Wink, R.: Gatekeepers and proximity in science-driven sectors in Europe and Asia. Regional Studies (2007b, erscheint demnächst) Wink, R.: Transregional Institutional Learning in Europe: Prerequisites, actors, and limitations. Regional Studies (2007c, erscheint demnächst) Downloads PDF Veröffentlicht 2007-07-31 Ausgabe Bd. 65 Nr. 4 (2007) Rubrik Forschungsbeitrag Lizenz Copyright (c) 2007 RuR Editors This work is re-published by oekom 2022 under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. Artikel in Raumforschung und Raumordnung - Spatial Research and Planing werden unter einer Creative Commons Lizenz veröffentlicht. Seit Jahrgang 79, Ausgabe 2, erfolgt die Veröffentlichung im Lizenzmodell CC BY 4.0 (Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License). Von Jahrgang 77 Ausgabe 1 bis Jahrgang 79 Ausgabe 1 wurden alle Artikel unter einer CC BY-SA-Lizenz veröffentlicht. Frühere Jahrgänge wurden von oekom 2022 unter the Lizenz CC BY 4.0 wiederveröffentlicht. Zitierweise 1.Wink R. Innovationsförderung durch die EU-Strukturpolitik nach 2007: neue Ansätze, alte Probleme?. RuR [Internet]. 31. Juli 2007 [zitiert 15. August 2026];65(4):315–326. Verfügbar unter: https://rur.oekom.de/index.php/rur/article/view/1308 Zitierformate ACM ACS APA ABNT Chicago Harvard IEEE MLA Turabian Vancouver Bibliografische Angaben herunterladen Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS) BibTeX Teilen
Call for Papers for a special issue on Transit-Oriented Development in Built-up Areas in the journal: Raumforschung und Raumordnung | Spatial Research and Planning (RuR) August 3, 2026 Call for Papers for a special issue on Transit-Oriented Development in Built-up Areas in the journal: Raumforschung und Raumordnung | Spatial Research and Planning (RuR)
Dank an die Reviewer im Jahr 2025 Juli 16, 2026 Die Herausgeber bedanken sich bei allen Gutachterinnen und Gutachtern, die im Jahr 2025 Artikel begutachtet haben.
Eine neue Ausgabe ist erschienen Juni 30, 2026 Eine neue Ausgabe der Open-Access-Zeitschrift "Raumforschung und Raumordnung | Spatial Research and Planning" ist erschienen. Band 84 Nr. 3 (2026) ist jetzt auf unserer Website verfügbar.