Economic convergence on different spatial levels: the conflict between cohesion and growth

Authors

  • Hans Kramar Department für Raumentwicklung, Infrastruktur- und Umweltplanung FB Stadt- und Regionalforschung, TU Wien, Operngasse 11, 1040, Wien, Österreich

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03183103

Abstract

The analysis of economic disparities within the European Union strongly depends on the regional level considered. Whereas the economic gap between the member states has decreased over the last decades, regional disparities have rather deepened. The reason for these contradictory findings can be found in the increasing disparities within many of the member states: Especially in growing economies the gap between urban centres and rural peripheries tends to widen. The spatial concentration of research and development, high skilled labour, infrastructure and foreign investment in the capitals will therefore suppose-ably become a big challenge for the accession countries, which will have to face increasing international competition. Joining a common market of more than 450 million people means new opportunities, challenges and threats for economic development, which have to be faced by local, regional and national governments as well as by European institutions.

EU-policies act in the dichotomy between the conflicting goals of economic growth and cohesion. Since they strongly influence regional conditions for production it is of great political interest whether a certain measure fosters economic efficiency by favouring the highly developed centres or rather enhances convergence by promoting lagging regions. The answer is, however, not trivial and needs closer examination: Measures encouraging regional cohesion on the European level can also increase disparities within a state or a region at the same time. This is the reason why the regional effects of EU-policies have to be analysed on different spatial levels.

Dealing with the spatial impacts of various European Policies (Regional Policy, Trans-European Networks, Common Agricultural Policy, Research and Technological Development Policy) there is some evidence that these policies try to compensate the effects of growing competition in the common market by concentrating their efforts on urban growth poles within the underdeveloped countries. Doing that, the European Union comes up to the two conflicting goals of growth and cohesion by promoting efficient economic development in the member states on the one hand and regional convergence on the European level on the other. This approach is of course mainly directed at European objectives and brings about new problems for the member states: According to the principle of subsidiarity the growing divergence within the member states is, however, not a policy task of the European Union but of the member states: Therefore national politics are still required to take on responsibility for these intranational problems by adopting their transport, regional and economic policies to the new challenge.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Bökemann, D.; Wegener, M.: The SASI Model: Model Structure. SASI Deliverable Dil, Report to the European Commision. — Dortmund 1998. = Berichte aus dem Institut für Raumplanung 40

European Commununities: Decision No. 1692/96/CE of the European Parliament and of the Council. Community guidelines for the development of the trans European transport networks. Official Journal of the European Communities 39 (1996) L 228, September 9th 1996, p. 1–104

European Communities: Unity, solidarity, diversity for Europe, its people and its territory: Second report on economic and social cohesion. — Luxembourg 2001

European Communities: Treaty establishing the European Community. — Luxembourg 2002

European Communities: A new partnership for cohesion: Third report on economic and social cohesion. — Luxembourg 2004

Eurostat: (2005) General and Regional Statistics: Gross Domestic Product (GDP) at market prices at NUTS level 3 (2005; http://epp.eurostat.cec.eu.int/portal/page?_pageid=0,1136162,0_45572076&_dad=portal&_schema=PORTAL)

ESPON: Project 2.1.2: Territorial Impact of EU-Research and Development Policy. Final Report (2004 a; www.espon.lu/online/documentation/projects/policy_impact/1870/fr-2.1.2.pdf)

ESPON: Project 2.1.3: The Territorial Impact of CAP and Rural Development Policy

Final Report (2004b; www.espon.lu/online/documentation/projects/policy_impact/2901/fr-2.1.3_revised_31-03-05.pdf)

ESPON: Project 2.2.1: The Territorial Effects of the Structural Funds. Final Report (2004c; www.espon.fu/online/documentation/projects/policy_impact/2875/fr-2.2.1_part_a_pres-pg_15.04.05.pdf)

Kramar, H.: Zum Ausbau des hochrangigen europäischen Verkehrssystems: Zentralisierung der Wirtschaftskraft versus Erschließung der peripheren Regionen. In: EU-Verkehrspolitik für bessere Transportsysteme — zwischen Integrationsauftrag und Positionsinteressen von Verkehrsbetrieben, Verkehrsträgern und Regionen. Hrsg.: Faller, P.; Gürtlich, G.H.; Österreichische Verkehrswissenschaftliche Gesellschaft. — Wien 2002. = ÖVG Spezial, Band 56a, S. 161–172

TINA Secretariat: Proposed Trans-European Transport Network for the enlarged Union (1999; www.tinavienna.at/tinasecretariat/euro.html)

Downloads

Published

2006-01-31

Issue

Section

Research Article

How to Cite

1.
Kramar H. Economic convergence on different spatial levels: the conflict between cohesion and growth. RuR [Internet]. 2006 Jan. 31 [cited 2024 May 22];64(1):18–27. Available from: https://rur.oekom.de/index.php/rur/article/view/1413