Rural Community Development Click-by-Click. Processes and dynamics of digitally supported social innovations in peripheral rural areas Authors Nicole Zerrer Leibniz-Institut für Raumbezogene Sozialforschung (IRS) https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5394-4289 Ariane Sept Leibniz-Institut für Raumbezogene Sozialforschung (IRS) https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8691-1950 Gabriela Christmann Leibniz-Institut für Raumbezogene Sozialforschung (IRS) https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7799-3536 DOI: https://doi.org/10.14512/rur.145 Keywords: Digitalisation, village development, sociospatial processes, rural challenges, social innovation, innovation process Abstract Even before the Covid-19 pandemic, residents in peripheral and structurally weak rural areas began to move into the digital age. Digital tools are being used and developed to address existing challenges in rural areas such as local communication, healthcare or mobility. Against the background of a conceptual framework of social and digital innovations from a process perspective, this paper asks how the processes and dynamics of digitally supported social innovations in rural areas can be understood and described. By analysing five villages in Germany, we show that the digital initiatives – despite their different contexts, contents and driving actors – develop over three phases: an inspiration phase, an emergence phase and a consolidation phase. This dynamic process can be interpreted as “linear-circular”, because while overall a very targeted development of innovative problem solutions can be observed within the three-phase process, at the same time creative development loops and new inspirations exercise influence. Downloads Download data is not yet available. References Atkinson, P.; Hammersley, M. (1994): Ethnography and participant observation. In: Denzin, N.K.; Lincoln, Y.S. (eds.): Handbook of qualitative research. Thousand Oaks, 248–261. Balconi, M.; Brusoni, S.; Orsenigo, L. (2010): In defence of the linear model. An essay. In: Research Policy 39, 1, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2009.09.013 Beetz, S. (2004): Dorfer in Bewegung. Hamburg. = Beitrage zur Osteuropaforschung 9. Bock, B.B. (2016): Rural marginalisation and the role of social innovation. A turn towards nexogenous development and rural reconnection. In: Sociologia Ruralis 56, 4, 552–573. https://doi.org/10.1111/soru.12119 Braun-Thurmann, H. (2005): Innovation. Bielefeld. Brennen, J.S.; Kreiss, D. (2016): Digitalization. In: Jensen, K.B.; Rothenbuhler, E.W.; Pooley, J.D.; Craig, R.T. (eds.): The international encyclopedia of communication theory and philosophy. Ort, 556–566. Butzin, A. (2014): Knowledge dynamics in innovation biographies. A methodological and spatial perspective. Dissertation, Philipps-Universitat Marburg. Castro-Arce, K.; Vanclay, F. (2020): Transformative social innovation for sustainable rural development. An analytical framework to assist community-based initiatives. In: Journal of Rural Studies 74, 45–54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2019.11.010 Christmann, G. (2020): How social innovation can be supported in structurally weak rural regions. Erkner = IRS Dialog 5/2020. Christmann, G.; Ibert, O.; Jessen, J.; Walther, U.-J. (2018): How does novelty enter spatial planning? Conceptualizing innovations in planning and research strategies. In: Rammert, W.; Windeler, A.; Knoblauch, H.; Hutter, M. (eds.): Innovation society today. Perspectives, fields, and cases. Wiesbaden, 247–272. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-19269-3_12 Christmann, G.; Ibert, O.; Jessen, J.; Walther, U.-J. (2020): Innovations in spatial planning as a social process – phases, actors, conflicts. In: European Planning Studies 28, 3, 496–520. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2019.1639399 Coronado, D.; Acosta, M.; Fernandez, A. (2008): Attitudes to innovation in peripheral economic regions. In: Research Policy 37, 6-7, 1009–1021. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2008.03.009 Cowie, P.; Townsend, L.; Salemink, K. (2020): Smart rural futures. Will rural areas be left behind in the 4th industrial revolution? In: Journal of Rural Studies 79, 169–176. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2020.08.042 de Fatima Ferreiro, M.; Sousa, C.; Sheikh, F.A.; Novikova, M. (2021): Social innovation and rural territories. Exploring invisible contexts and actors in Portugal and India. In: Journal of Rural Studies. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2021.04.013 Dolata, U. (2019): Sektoraler Wandel durch Technik. In: Blattel-Mink, B.; Schulz-Schaeffer, I.; Windeler, A. (eds.): Handbuch Innovationsforschung. Heidelberg, 201–218. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-17668-6_13 Doringer, S. (2020): Governance entrepreneurship in regiona economic development. Individual agency in Austria. In: Regional Studies, Regional Science 7, 1, 550–567. https://doi.org/10.1080/21681376.2020.1842801 Eder, J. (2019): Innovation in the periphery. A critical survey and research agenda. In: International Regional Science Review 42, 2, 119–146. https://doi.org/10.1177/0160017618764279 Ehalt, H.C.; Schulz,W. (eds.) (2000): Landliche Lebenswelten im Wandel. Frankfurt am Main. Faber, K.; Oswalt, P. (eds.) (2013): Raumpioniere in landlichen Regionen. Neue Wege der Daseinsvorsorge. Leipzig. = Edition Bauhaus 35. Gillwald, K. (2000): Konzepte sozialer Innovation. Berlin. = WZB Discussion Paper P 00-519. Grillitsch, M.; Nilsson, M. (2015): Innovation in peripheral regions. Do collaborations compensate for a lack of local knowledge spillovers? In: The Annals of Regional Science 54, 1, 299–321. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00168-014-0655-8 Grillitsch, M.; Sotarauta, M. (2020): Trinity of change agency, regional development paths and opportunity spaces. In: Progress in Human Geography 44, 4, 704–723. https://doi.org/10.1177/0309132519853870 Henkel, G. (ed.) (2004): Dorfliche Lebensstile. Mythos, Chance oder Hemmschuh der landlichen Entwicklung? Essen. Hepp, A. (2020): Deep mediatization. London. Hepp, A.; Hjarvard, S.; Lundby, K. (2015): Mediatization. Theorizing the interplay between media, culture and society. In: Media, Culture and Society 37, 2, 314–324. https://doi.org/10.1177/0163443715573835 Hewitt, R.J.; de Boer, C.; Flacke, J. (2020): Participatory development of digital support tools for local-scale energy transitions. Lessons from two European case studies. In: Global Transitions 2, 138–149. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.glt.2020.07.003 Howaldt, J.; Kopp, R.; Schwarz, M. (2015): On the theory of social innovations. Tarde’s neglected contribution to the development of a sociological innovation theory. Weinheim. Howaldt, J.; Schwarz, M. (2010): “Soziale Innovation” im Fokus. Skizze eines gesellschaftstheoretisch inspirierten Forschungskonzepts. Bielefeld. Hutter, M.; Knoblauch, H.; Rammert, W.; Windeler, A. (2018): Innovation society today. The reflexive creation of novelty. In: Rammert, W.; Windeler, A.; Knoblauch, H.; Hutter, M. (eds.): Innovation society today. Perspectives, fields, and cases. Wiesbaden, 13–31. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-19269-3_2 Jessop, B.; Moulaert, F.; Hulgard, L.; Hamdouch, A. (2013): Social innovation research. A new stage in innovation analysis? In: Moulaert, F.; MacCallum, D.; Mehmood, A.; Hamdouch, A. (eds.): The international handbook on social innovation: Collective action, social learning and transdisciplinary research. Cheltenham, 110-130. Jungsberg, L.; Copus, A.; Herslund, L.B.; Nilsson, K.; Perjo, L.; Randall, L.; Berlina, A. (2020): Key actors in community-driven social innovation in rural areas in the Nordic countries. In: Journal of Rural Studies 79, 276–285. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2020.08.004 Kline, S.J.; Rosenberg, N. (1986): An overview of innovation. In: Landau, R.; Rosenberg, N. (eds.): The positive sum strategy. Harnessing technology for economic growth. Washington, DC, 275–305. Kluvankova, T.; Nijnik, M.; Spacek, M.; Sarkki, S.; Perlik, M.; Lukesch, R.; Melnykovych, M.; Valero, D.; Brnkalakova, S. (2021): Social innovation for sustainability transformation and its diverging development paths in marginalised rural areas. In: Sociologia Ruralis 61, 2, 344–371. https://doi.org/10.1111/SORU.12337 Knoblauch, H. (2005): Focused ethnography. In: Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung 6, 3, 44. https://doi.org/10.17169/fqs-6.3.20 Lukesch, R.; Ludvig, A.; Slee, B.;Weiss, G.; Živojinović, I. (2020): Social innovation, societal change, and the role of policies. In: Sustainability 12, 18, 7407. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12187407 Meili, R.; Shearmur, R. (2019): Diverse diversities. Open innovation in small towns and rural areas. In: Growth and Change 50, 2, 492–514. https://doi.org/10.1111/grow.12291 Mettenberger, T.; Zscherneck, J.; Kupper, P. (2021): Wenn Neues aufs Land kommt. Entwicklung, Umsetzung und Verbreitung innovativer Losungen zur digitalen Daseinsvorsorge. In: Raumforschung und Raumordnung | Spatial Research and Planning 79, 6, 543–556. https://doi.org/10.14512/rur.90 Morisson, A.; Mayer, H. (2021): An agent of change against all odds? The case of Ledger in Vierzon, France. In: Local Economy: The Journal of the Local Economy Policy Unit 36, 5, 430–447. https://doi.org/10.1177/02690942211052014 Mulgan, G. (2006): The process of social innovation. In: Innovations: Technology, Governance, Globalization 1, 2, 145–162. https://doi.org/10.1162/itgg.2006.1.2.145 Nell, W.; Weiland, M. (eds.) (2014): Imaginare Dorfer. Zur Wiederkehr des Dorflichen in Literatur, Film und Lebenswelt. Bielefeld. = Rurale Topografien 1. Neumeier, S. (2012): Why do social innovations in rural development matter and should they be considered more seriously in rural development research? Proposal for a stronger focus on social innovations in rural development research. In: Sociologia Ruralis 52, 1, 48–69. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9523.2011.00553.x Neumeier, S. (2017): Social innovation in rural development. Identifying the key factors of success. In: The Geographical Journal 183, 1, 34–46. https://doi.org/10.1111/geoj.12180 Ney, S.; Meinel, C. (2019): Putting design thinking to work. How large organizations can embrace messy institutions to tackle wicked problems. Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-19609-7 Noack, A.; Federwisch, T. (2019): Social innovation in rural regions. Urban impulses and cross-border constellations of actors. In: Sociologia Ruralis 59, 1, 92–112. https://doi.org/10.1111/soru.12216 Noack, A.; Federwisch, T. (2020): Social innovation in rural regions. Older adults and creative community development. In: Rural Sociology 85, 4, 1021–1044. https://doi.org/10.1111/ruso.12333 Plattner, H.; Meinel, C.;Weinberg, U. (2009): Design thinking. Innovation lernen – Ideenwelten offnen. Munchen. Popitz, H. (1995):Der Aufbruch zur artifiziellen Gesellschaft. Zur Anthropologie der Technik. Tubingen. Qiang, C.Z.; Kuek, S.C.; Dymond, A.; Esselaar, S. (2012): Mobile applications for agriculture and rural development. Washington, DC. = World Bank Report 96226-GLB. Rammert, W. (2010): Die Innovationen der Gesellschaft. In: Howaldt, J.; Jacobsen, H. (eds.): Soziale Innovation. Wiesbaden, 21–51. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-531-92469-4_2. Rammert, W.; Windeler, A.; Knoblauch, H.; Hutter, M. (eds.) (2018): Innovation society today. Perspectives, fields, and cases. Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-19269-3 Richter, R.; Christmann, G. (2021): On the role of key players in rural social innovation processes. In: Journal of Rural Studies. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2021.04.010 Salemink, K.; Strijker, D.; Bosworth, G. (2017): Rural development in the digital age. A systematic literature review on unequal ICT availability, adoption, and use in rural areas. In: Journal of Rural Studies 54, 360–371. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2015.09.001 Sarkki, S.; Dalla Torre, C.; Fransala, J.; Živojinović, I.; Ludvig, A.; Gorriz-Mifsud, E.; Melnykovych, M.; Sfeir, P.R.; Arbia, L.; Bengoumi, M.; Chorti, H.; Gramm, V.; Lopez Marco, L.; Ravazzoli, E.; Nijnik, M. (2021): Reconstructive social innovation cycles in women-led initiatives in rural areas. In: Sustainability 13, 3, 1231. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13031231 Schumpeter, J.A. (1911): Theorie der wirtschaftlichen Entwicklung. Leipzig. Sept, A. (2020): Thinking together digitalization and social innovation in rural areas. An exploration of rural digitalization projects in Germany. In: European Countryside 12, 2, 193–208. https://doi.org/10.2478/euco-2020-0011 Strauss, A.; Corbin, J.M. (eds.) (1997): Grounded theory in practice. Thousand Oaks. Thapa, B.; Opiela, N.; Rothe,M.S. (2020): Landlich, digital, attraktiv – Digitale Losungsansatze fur landliche Raume. Berlin. Townsend, L.; Wallace, C.; Fairhurst, G. (2015): ‘Stuck out here’. The critical role of broadband for remote rural places. In: Scottish Geographical Journal 131, 3-4, 171–180. https://doi.org/10.1080/14702541.2014.978807 Tschumi, P.; Winiger, A.; Wirth, S.; Mayer, H.; Seidl, I. (2022): Growth independence through social innovations? In: Lange, B.; Hulz, M.; Schmid, B.; Schulz, C. (eds.): Post-growth geographies. Spatial relations of diverse and alternative economies. Bielefeld, 113–136. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783839457337-009 Visvizi, A.; Lytras, M.D.; Mudri, G. (eds.) (2019): Smart villages in the EU and beyond. Bingley. https://doi.org/10.1108/9781787698451 Witzel, A. (2000): The problem-centered interview. In: Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung 1, 1. https://doi.org/10.17169/FQS-1.1.1132 Zapf, W. (1989): Uber soziale Innovationen. In: Soziale Welt 40, 1/2, 170–183. Zerrer, N.; Sept, A. (2020): Smart villagers as actors of digital social innovation in rural areas. In: Urban Planning 5, 4, 78–88. https://doi.org/10.17645/up.v5i4.3183 Downloads PDF HTML XML Published Issue publication date 2022-06-30 (version 2)Published online first 2022-06-17 (version 1) Versions 2022-06-30 (2) 2022-06-17 (1) Issue Vol. 80 No. 3 (2022) Section Research Article License Copyright (c) 2022 Nicole Zerrer, Ariane Sept, Gabriela Christmann This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. Articles in Raumforschung und Raumordnung – Spatial Research and Planning are published under a Creative Commons license. From Vol. 79 No. 2 (2021), the license applied is CC BY 4.0. From Vol. 77 No. 1 to Vol. 79 No.1, articles were published under a CC BY-SA license. Earlier volumes have been re-published by oekom 2022 under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License CC BY 4.0. How to Cite 1.Zerrer N, Sept A, Christmann G. Rural Community Development Click-by-Click. Processes and dynamics of digitally supported social innovations in peripheral rural areas. RuR [Internet]. 2022 Jun. 30 [cited 2025 Feb. 8];80(3):314-28. Available from: https://rur.oekom.de/index.php/rur/article/view/145 More Citation Formats ACM ACS APA ABNT Chicago Harvard IEEE MLA Turabian Vancouver Download Citation Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS) BibTeX Share
A new Issue has been published December 30, 2024 A new issue of the Open-Access-Journal "Raumforschung und Raumordnung | Spatial Research and Planning" has been published. Volume 82 No. 6 (2024) is now available on our website.
A new Issue has been published October 30, 2024 A new issue of the Open-Access-Journal "Raumforschung und Raumordnung | Spatial Research and Planning" has been published. Volume 82 No. 5 (2024) is now available on our website.
A new Issue has been published August 30, 2024 A new issue of the Open-Access-Journal "Raumforschung und Raumordnung | Spatial Research and Planning" has been published. Volume 82 No. 4 (2024) is now available on our website.