Potentials of Climate Emergency Declarations for degrowth transformations. The ambivalent stance of German municipalities in conflicts over a post-fossil future

Anton Brokow-Loga; Timmo Krüger

doi:10.14512/rur.1666

Authors

Anton Brokow-Loga Bauhaus-Universität Weimar
Timmo Krüger Bauhaus-Universität Weimar

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.14512/rur.1666

Keywords:

Degrowth, climate emergency, municipalities, conflicts, post-fossil transformations

Abstract

This paper addresses the scope for action by municipalities in a climate emergency and places it in the framework of ecomodern (urban) policy. We analyse the way in which two German ‘climate emergency municipalities’ translate conflicts of post-fossil transformation into concrete political and planning strategies. Although more than 2,200 authorities around the world have already declared a climate emergency, research on the impact of these resolutions on the political orientation of municipalities is very limited. Our research focus is on the (potentially agonistic) treatment of conflicts in planning. We argue that in times of a socio-ecological crisis, success in conflict resolution cannot refer to appeasement and depoliticisation. Instead, we propose a framework of five criteria, based on critical theory on ecomodern strategies, planning processes and degrowth. Thus, this practice-related and explorative paper connects empirical insights from the German cities of Constance and Berlin with an innovative normative framework. The findings tell a complex story of an, at least partial, admission of the failure of previous climate mitigation strategies, a lack of social institutions of limits, an instrumental relation to nature and a disregard for social injustices. The paper discusses how municipalities, in the context of ongoing tensions over the post-fossil transformation in Germany, on the one hand hold on to business-as-usual approaches, but on the other hand also set political impulses for change.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Abgeordnetenhaus Berlin (2020): Beschluss zur Volksinitiative „Klimanotstand Berlin“. 53. Sitzung des Abgeordnetenhauses. Drucksache 18/2236‑1. Berlin.

Adorno, T.W. (2003): Fortschritt. In: Tiedemann, R.; Adorno, G.; Buck-Morss, S.; Schultz, K. (eds.): Theodor W. Adorno. Gesammelte Schriften. Kulturkritik und Gesellschaft II. Frankfurt am Main, 617–638.

Bloch, E. (1987): Natural Law and Human Dignity. Cambridge.

Boeth, H.; Kühn, M. (2022): Wachstumskoalitionen und Wachstumskritiken in der Stadtentwicklung: Reurbanisierungs- und Zuwanderungspolitiken. In: Raumforschung und Raumordnung | Spatial Research and Planning 80, 6, 743–756. https://doi.org/10.14512/rur.161

Brand, U.; Wissen, M. (2021): The Imperial Mode of Living. Everyday Life and the Ecological Crisis of Capitalism. London.

Brenner, N.; Marcuse, P.; Mayer, M. (2009): Cities for people, not for profit. In: City 13, 2‑3, 176–184. https://doi.org/10.1080/13604810903020548

Brokow-Loga, A.; Eckardt, F. (eds.) (2020): Postwachstumsstadt. Konturen einer solidarischen Stadtpolitik. München.

Chou, M. (2021): Australian local governments and climate emergency declarations: Reviewing local government practice. In: Australian Journal of Public Administration 80, 3, 613–623. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8500.12451

Davidson, K.; Briggs, J.; Nolan, E.; Bush, J.; Håkansson, I.; Moloney, S. (2020): The making of a climate emergency response: Examining the attributes of climate emergency plans. In: Urban Climate 33, 100666, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.uclim.2020.100666

Dingler, J. (2003): Postmoderne und Nachhaltigkeit. Eine diskurstheoretische Analyse der sozialen Konstruktionen von nachhaltiger Entwicklung. München. = Hochschulschriften zur Nachhaltigkeit 7.

Durner, W. (2023): Juristische Perspektiven auf die Idee der agonistischen Planung. In: Raumforschung und Raumordnung | Spatial Research and Planning. https://doi.org/10.14512/rur.1662

Durrant, D.; Lamker, C.; Rydin, Y. (2023): The Potential of Post-Growth Planning: Re-Tooling the Planning Profession for Moving beyond Growth. In: Planning Theory and Practice 24, 2, 287–295. https://doi.org/10.1080/14649357.2023.2198876

Eichenauer, E. (2018): Energiekonflikte – Proteste gegen Windkraftanlagen als Spiegel demokratischer Defizite. In: Radtke, J.; Kersting, N. (eds.): Energiewende. Politikwissenschaftliche Perspektiven. Wiesbaden, 315–341. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-21561-3_11

Eichenauer, E.; Reusswig, F.; Meyer-Ohlendorf, L.; Lass, W. (2018): Bürgerinitiativen gegen Windkraftanlagen und der Aufschwung rechtspopulistischer Bewegungen. In: Kühne, O.; Weber, F. (eds.): Bausteine der Energiewende. Wiesbaden, 633–651. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-19509-0_32

Escobar, A. (2015): Degrowth, postdevelopment, and transitions: a preliminary conversation. In: Sustainability Science 10, 3, 451–462. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-015-0297-5

Eversberg, D. (2020): Who can challenge the imperial mode of living? The terrain of struggles for social-ecological transformation in the German population. In: Innovation: The European Journal of Social Science Research 33, 2, 233–256. https://doi.org/10.1080/13511610.2019.1674129

Exner, A.; Kratzwald, B. (2021): Solidarische Ökonomie & Commons. Eine Einführung. Wien.

Fitzpatrick, N.; Parrique, T.; Cosme, I. (2022): Exploring degrowth policy proposals: A systematic mapping with thematic synthesis. In: Journal of Cleaner Production 365, 132764. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.132764

Galvin, R. (2018): ‘Them and us’: Regional-national power-plays in the German energy transformation: A case study in Lower Franconia. In: Energy Policy 113, 269–277. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2017.11.016

Gemeinderat Konstanz (2019): Ausrufung des Klimanotstands in Konstanz – Ratsbeschluss und Resolution vom 2. Mai 2019. Konstanz. https://www.konstanz.de/stadtwandel/konzepte+und+chronologie/klimanotstand (31.07.2023).

Görg, C. (2003): Regulation der Naturverhältnisse. Zu einer kritischen Regulation der ökologischen Krise. Münster.

Graefe, S. (2017): Subjective limits to growth and the limits to a lifestyle oriented critique of growth. In: Rosa, H.; Henning, C. (eds.): The good life beyond growth. New perspectives. London, 201–211. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315542126

Greenfield, A.; Moloney, S.; Granberg, M. (2022): Climate Emergencies in Australian Local Governments: From Symbolic Act to Disrupting the Status Quo? In: Climate 10, 38, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.3390/cli10030038

Haberl, H.; Wiedenhofer, D.; Virág, D.; Kalt, G.; Plank, B.; Brockway, P.; Fishman, T.; Hausknost, D.; Krausmann, F.; Leon-Gruchalski, B.; Mayer, A.; Pichler, M.; Schaffartzik, A.; Sousa, T.; Streeck, J.; Creutzig, F. (2020): A systematic review of the evidence on decoupling of GDP, resource use and GHG emissions, part II: synthesizing the insights. In: Environmental Research Letters 15, 6, 065003. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ab842a

Hagbert, P.; Wangel, J.; Broms, L. (2020): Exploring the Potential for Just Urban Transformations in Light of Eco-Modernist Imaginaries of Sustainability. In: Urban Planning 5, 4, 204–216. https://doi.org/10.17645/up.v5i4.3302

Hale, T.N.; Chan, S.; Hsu, A.; Clapper, A.; Elliott, C.; Faria, P.; Kuramochi, T.; McDaniel, S.; Morgado, M.; Roelfsema, M.; Santaella, M.; Singh, N.; Tout, I.; Weber, C.; Weinfurter, A.; Widerberg, O. (2021): Sub- and non-state climate action: a framework to assess progress, implementation and impact. In: Climate Policy 21, 3, 406–420. https://doi.org/10.1080/14693062.2020.1828796

Hirschl, B.; Pfeifer, L. (2020): Kommunen im Klimanotstand: Wichtige Akteure für kommunalen Klimaschutz. Kurzstudie zu Prozessen, Eigenschaften und Schwerpunkten. Berlin. = Diskussionspapier des IÖW 71/20.

Hirschl, B.; Schwarz, U.; Weiß, J.; Hirschberg, R.; Torliene, L. (2021): Berlin Paris-konform machen. Eine Aktualisierung der Machbarkeitsstudie „Klimaneutrales Berlin 2050“ mit Blick auf die Anforderungen aus dem UN-Abkommen von Paris. Im Auftrag des Landes Berlin, vertreten durch die Senatsverwaltung für Umwelt, Verkehr und Klimaschutz. Berlin.

Howarth, C.; Lane, M.; Fankhauser, S. (2021): What next for local government climate emergency declarations? The gap between rhetoric and action. In: Climatic Change 167, 3‑4, 27. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-021-03147-4

IPCC – Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (2018): Global warming of 1.5°C. An IPCC Special Report on the impacts of global warming of 1.5°C above pre-industrial levels and related global greenhouse gas emission pathways, in the context of strengthening the global response to the threat of climate change, sustainable development, and efforts to eradicate poverty. Geneva.

Kallis, G. (2019): Limits. Why Malthus was wrong and why environmentalists should care. Stanford.

Kalt, T.; Tunn, J. (2022): Shipping the sunshine? A critical research agenda on the global hydrogen transition. In: GAIA – Ecological Perspectives for Science and Society 31, 2, 72-76. https://doi.org/10.14512/gaia.31.2.2

Kemmerzell, J. (2019): Bridging the Gap Between the Local and the Global Scale? The Wicked Problem of Climate Change Through Trans-Local Governance. In: Behnke, N.; Broschek, J.; Sonnicksen, J. (eds.): Configurations, Dynamics and Mechanisms of Multilevel Governance. Cham, 155–172. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-05511-0_9

Kibiswa, N.K. (2019): Directed qualitative content analysis (DQICA): A tool for conflict analysis. The Qualitative Report 24, 8, 2059–2079.

Krähmer, K. (2021): Are green cities sustainable? A degrowth critique of sustainable urban development in Copenhagen. In: European Planning Studies 29, 7, 1272–1289. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2020.1841119

Krüger, T. (2015): Das Hegemonieprojekt der ökologischen Modernisierung. Die Konflikte um Carbon Capture and Storage (CCS) in der internationalen Klimapolitik. Bielefeld.

Krüger, T. (2022): The German energy transition and the eroding consensus on ecological modernization: A radical democratic perspective on conflicts over competing justice claims and energy visions. In: Futures 136, 102899. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2021.102899

Moser, S.; Kleinhückelkotten, S. (2018): Good Intents, but Low Impacts. Diverging Importance of Motivational and Socioeconomic Determinants Explaining Pro-Environmental Behavior, Energy Use, and Carbon Footprint. In: Environment and Behavior 50, 6, 626–656. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916517710685

Mössner, S. (2016): Sustainable Urban Development as Consensual Practice: Post-Politics in Freiburg, Germany. In: Regional Studies 50, 6, 971–982. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2015.1102875

North, P.; Nurse, A.; Barker, T. (2017): The neoliberalisation of climate? Progressing climate policy under austerity urbanism. In: Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space 49, 8, 1797–1815. https://doi.org/10.1177/0308518X16686353

Oei, P.-Y.; Kendziorski, M.; Herpich, P.; Kemfert, C.; von Hirschhausen, C. (2020): Klimaschutz statt Kohleschmutz. Woran es beim Kohleausstieg hakt und was zu tun ist. Berlin. = DIW Berlin: Politikberatung kompakt 148.

Otto, I.M.; Kim, K.M.; Dubrovsky, N.; Lucht, W. (2019): Shift the focus from the super-poor to the super-rich. In: Nature Climate Change 9, 82–84. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-019-0402-3

Paavola, J. (2017): Health impacts of climate change and health and social inequalities in the UK. In: Environmental Health 16, S1, 113. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12940-017-0328-z

Parrique, T.; Barth, J.; Briens, F.; Kerschner, C.; Kraus-Polk, A.; Kuokkanen, A.; Spangenberg, J.H. (2019): Decoupling debunked. Evidence and arguments against green growth as a sole strategy for sustainability. Brussels.

Polanyi, K. (2001): The great transformation. The political and economic origins of our time. Boston.

Prause, L.; Dietz, K. (2022): Just mobility futures: Challenges for e‑mobility transitions from a global perspective. In: Futures 141, 102987. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2022.102987

Rilling, B.; Tosun, J. (2021): Policy and political consequences of mandatory climate impact assessments: an explorative study of German cities and municipalities. In: Policy and Society 40, 1, 99–115. https://doi.org/10.1080/14494035.2021.1907901

Rode, P. (2019): Climate Emergency and Cities: An urban-led mobilisation? The Climate Decade’s priorities for urban climate action, policy and research. London.

Röhlig, M. (2020): Vor einem Jahr hat Konstanz den Klimanotstand ausgerufen – was hat die Stadt seither erreicht? In: Der Spiegel vom 8. Mai 2020.

Rosa, H. (2017): Available, accessible, attainable. The mindset of growth and the resonance conception of the good life. In: Rosa, H.; Henning, C. (eds.): The good life beyond growth. New perspectives. London, 39–54. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315542126

Rosol, M.; Béal, V.; Mössner, S. (2017): Greenest cities? The (post-)politics of new urban environmental regimes. In: Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space 49, 8, 1710–1718. https://doi.org/10.1177/0308518X17714843

Ruiz-Campillo, X.; Castán Broto, V.; Westman, L. (2021): Motivations and Intended Outcomes in Local Governments’ Declarations of Climate Emergency. In: Politics and Governance 9, 2, 17–28. https://doi.org/10.17645/pag.v9i2.3755

Sander, H. (2016): Die Klimagerechtigkeitsbewegung in Deutschland. Entwicklung und Perspektiven. Berlin.

Senatsverwaltung für Umwelt, Verkehr und Klimaschutz (2021a): Verstärkte Maßnahmen Berlins in Anerkennung der Klimanotlage. Berlin.

Senatsverwaltung für Umwelt, Verkehr und Klimaschutz (2021b): Berlin führt Klimacheck für Senatsvorlagen ein. Berlin. https://www.berlin.de/sen/uvk/presse/pressemitteilungen/2021/pressemitteilung.1076960.php (31.07.2023).

Senatsverwaltung für Umwelt, Verkehr und Klimaschutz (2021c): Klimanotlage in Berlin. Berlin. https://www.berlin.de/sen/uvk/klimaschutz/klimaschutzpolitik-in-berlin/klimanotlage/ (31.07.2023).

Senatsverwaltung für Mobilität, Verkehr, Klimaschutz und Umwelt (2022): Ziele und Grundlagen der Klimaschutzpolitik in Berlin. Berlin. https://www.berlin.de/sen/uvk/klimaschutz/klimaschutzpolitik-in-berlin/ziele-und-grundlagen/ (31.07.2023).

Sovacool, B.K.; Salem, H.A.; Bazilian, M.; Radley, B.; Nemery, B.; Okatz, J.; Mulvaney, D. (2020): Sustainable minerals and metals for a low-carbon future. In: Science 367, 6473, 30–33. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aaz6003

SPD; Bündnis 90/Die Grünen; FDP (2021): Dare more progress. Alliance for Freedom, Justice and Sustainability. Coalition Agreement 2021-2025 between the Social Democratic Party of Germany (SPD), Alliance 90/The Greens and the Free Democrats (FDP). Berlin.

Stadt Konstanz (2021): Konstanzer Klimaschutzstrategie. Wie die Entwicklung zur klimaneutralen Stadt gelingen soll. Konstanz.

Stadt Konstanz (2022a): Zwischenruf aus dem Klimanotstand. Konstanz. https://www.konstanz.de/service/pressereferat/pressemitteilungen/dritter+jahrestag+klimanotstand?contrast (31.07.2023).

Stadt Konstanz (2022b): Klimaschutzstrategie Konstanz. Heidelberg.

Sutton, P. (2017): Local-first implementation. Why a strong climate declaration is needed – at the local government level – and what it can do. o.O.

Tenzing, J.D. (2020): Integrating social protection and climate change adaptation: A review. In: Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change 11, 2, e626. https://doi.org/10.1002/wcc.626

Tittor, A. (2021): Towards an Extractivist Bioeconomy? The Risk of Deepening Agrarian Extractivism When Promoting Bioeconomy in Argentina. In: Backhouse, M.; Lehmann, R.; Lorenzen, K.; Lühmann, M.; Puder, J.; Rodríguez, F.; Tittor, A. (eds.): Bioeconomy and global inequalities: socio-ecological perspectives on biomass sourcing and production. Cham, 309–330. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-68944-5_15

Wagner, O.; Berlo, K. (2015): The wave of remunicipalisation of energy networks and supply in Germany – the establishment of 72 new municipal power utilities. In: ECEEE 2015 Summer Study Proceedings. Toulon, 559–569.

Wahlund, M.; Hansen, T. (2022): Exploring alternative economic pathways: a comparison of foundational economy and Doughnut economics. In: Sustainability: Science, Practice and Policy 18, 1, 171–186. https://doi.org/10.1080/15487733.2022.2030280