Managing and controlling diffuse urbanisation in France: Spatial planning practices in cross-border city-regions


  • Camille Le Bivic Université Gustave Eiffel
  • Joël Idt Université Gustave Eiffel



Spatial planning practices, territorial governance, land take, land use instrument, cross-border areas



Managing and controlling “land take” of agricultural and natural land for urbanisation is the target of European and national policies. Although this objective seems to be increasingly understood among the actors, the prioritisation of issues and the measures taken by governments to achieve it are very heterogeneous. The practices of local public and private actors do not necessarily follow the directions established at national level by the instruments. This paper examines the concrete forms, in France, of collective action in the field of spatial planning to limit land take, particularly in French cross-border areas that are experiencing strong urban growth. The survey is based on 60 semi-structured interviews with public actors involved in the spatial transformations of the cross-border regions around Geneva, Lille-Kortrijk-Tournai, Luxembourg and Strasbourg-Karlsruhe. The survey shows that collective action in spatial planning is very diverse in France, depending on the regions and municipalities concerned, even if the legal rules are the same. Local public actors play strategically with the rules and adapt them. Moreover, the organisation of collective action to limit land take is marked by interdependencies between regions, and in our case between neighbouring countries, which are often left unexamined in national planning policies and instruments.


Download data is not yet available.


Bourdin, A.; Lefeuvre, M.-P.; Melé, P. (2006): Les règles du jeu urbain. Entre droit et confiance. Paris.

Bovet, J.; Marquard, E.; Schröter-Schlaack, C. (2019): International Expert Workshop on Land Take. Workshop Report. (13.07.2023).

Buitelaar E.; Leinfelder, H. (2020): Public Design of Urban Sprawl: Governments and the Extension of the Urban Fabric in Flanders and the Netherlands. In: Urban Planning 5, 1, 46–57. DOI:

Buitelaar, E.; Sorel, N. (2010): Between the rule of law and the quest for control: Legal certainty in the Dutch planning system. In: Land Use Policy 27, 3, 983–989. DOI:

Bundesregierung (2002): Perspektiven für Deutschland. Unsere Strategie für eine nachhaltige Entwicklung. Berlin.

Bundesregierung (2016): Deutsche Nachhaltigkeitsstrategie. Neuauflage 2016. Berlin.

Colsaet, A.; Laurans, Y.; Levrel, H. (2018): What Drives Land Take and Urban Land Expansion? A Systematic Review. In: Land Use Policy 79, 339–349. DOI:

Cotella, G.; Evers, D.; Janin Rivolin, U.; Solly, A.; Berisha, E. (2020): A Guide to Sustainable Urbanisation and Land-Use. Sustainable Urbanisation and land-use Practices in European Regions. Luxemburg.

Coulondre, A.; Lefebvre, H. (2018): Les logements des promoteurs privés: quelle géographie? In: Population & Avenir 736, 1, 17–19. DOI:

Decoville, A.; Durand, F. (2017): Challenges and obstacles in the production of cross-border territorial strategies: the example of the Greater Region. In: Transactions of the Association of European Schools of Planning, 1, 1, 65–78. DOI:

Durand, F. (2014): Challenges of Cross-Border Spatial Planning in the Metropolitan Regions of Luxembourg and Lille. In: Planning Practice and Research 29, 2, 113–132. DOI:

European Commission (2011): Roadmap to a Resource Efficient Europe. COM (2011) 571 final. Brussels.

European Commission (2021): EU Soil Strategy for 2030. COM (2021) 699 final. Brussels.

Evers, D.; van Schie, M.; van den Broek, L.; Nabielek, K.; Ritsema van Eck, J.; van Rijn, F.; van der Wouden, R.; Schmidt-Seiwert, V.; Hellings, A.; Binot, R.; Kiel, L.; Cotella, G.; Janin Rivolin, U.; Solly, A.; Berisha, E.; Casavola, D.; Katurić, I.; Gregar, M.; Simov, S.; Pavlek, K.; Lipovac, R.; Farinós-Dasí, J.; Llausàs, A.; Zornoza-Gallego, C.; Celinska-Janowicz, D.; Ploszaj, A.; Wojnar, K.; Gaupp-Berghausen, M.; Dallhammer, E.; Schuh, B.; Mollay, U.; Gaugitsch, R.; Slivinskaya, L.; Claus, T. (2020): Main Report. ESPON SUPER-Sustainable Urbanization and land-use Practices in European Regions. Luxembourg.

Faludi, A.; Korthals Altes, W. (1994): Evaluating communicative planning: A revised design for performance research. In: European Planning Studies 2, 4, 403–418. DOI:

Gerber, J.-D.; Nahrath, S.; Hartmann, T. (2017): The strategic use of time-limited property rights in land-use planning: Evidence from Switzerland. In: Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space 49, 7, 1684–1703. DOI:

Gouvernement de Wallonie (2019): Déclaration de Politique Wallonie 2019-2024. Brussels.

Gouvernement de Wallonie (2022): Artificialisation du territoire : (21.08.2023).

Gouvernement du Grand-Duché de Luxembourg (2010): PNDD Luxembourg. Un Luxembourg Durable pour une Meilleure Qualité de Vie. Luxembourg.

Gouvernement du Grand-Duché de Luxembourg (2022): Programme Directeur d’Aménagement du Territoire. Projet PDAT 2023. Luxembourg. (17.07.2023).

Halleux, J.-M. (2012): Vers la ville compacte qualitative? Gestion de la périurbanisation et actions publiques. In: Belgeo 1‑2, 1–20. DOI:

Hamez, G. (2022): Frontières nationales et aménagement: Paradoxes territoriaux en France et dans l’Union européenne. In: Bulletin de l’Association de Géographes Français 99, 1, 114–130. DOI:

Jehling, M.; Hecht, R. (2022): Do land policies make a difference? A data-driven approach to trace effects on urban form in France and Germany. In: Environment and Planning B: Urban Analytics and City Science 49, 1, 114–130. DOI:

Jehling, M.; Schorcht, M.; Hartmann, T. (2020): Densification in suburban Germany: approaching policy and space through concepts of justice. In: Town Planning Review 91, 3, 217–237. DOI:

Kerselaers, E.; Rogge, E.; Vanempten, E.; Lauwers, L.; Van Huylenbroeck, G. (2013): Changing land use in the countryside: Stakeholders’ perception of the ongoing rural planning processes in Flanders. In: Land Use Policy 32, 197–206. DOI:

Le Bivic, C.; Melot, R. (2020): Scheduling urbanization in rural municipalities: Local practices in land-use planning on the fringes of the Paris region. In: Land Use Policy 99, 105040, 1–13. DOI:

Leffers D.; Wekerle, G.R. (2020): Land developers as institutional and postpolitical actors: Sites of power in land use policy and planning. In: Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space 52, 2, 318–336. DOI:

Madeline, P. (2006): L’évolution du bâti agricole en France métropolitaine: un indice des mutations agricoles et rurales. In: L’Information Géographique 70, 3, 33–49. DOI:

Meijer, R.; Jonkman, A. (2020): Land-policy instruments for densification: the Dutch quest for Control. In: Town Planning Review 91, 3, 239–258. DOI:

Melot, R.; Delattre, L.; Napoléone, C. (2018): Construire dans les espaces agricoles et naturels. La planification d’urbanisme en région provençale. In: Études Rurales 201, 1, 118–139. DOI:

Nadin, V.; Fernandez Maldonado, A.M.; Zonneveld, W.; Stead, D.; Dabrowski, M.; Piskorek, K.; Sarkar, A.; Schmitt, P.; Smas, L.; Cotella, G.; Janin Rivolin, U.; Solly, A.; Berisha, E.; Pede, E.; Seardo, B.M.; Komornicki, T.; Goch, A.; Bednarek-Szczepańska, M.; Degórska, B.; Szejgiec-Kolenda, B.; Śleszyński, P.; Lüer, C.; Böhme, K.; Nedovic-Budic, Z.; Williams, B.; Varghese, J.; Colic, N.; Knaap, G.; Csák, L.; Faragó, L.; Mezei, C.; Kovács, I.P.; Pámer, Z.; Reimer, M.; Münter, A. (2018): Final Report. ESPON COMPASS – Comparative Analysis of Territorial Governance and Spatial Planning Systems in Europe. Luxembourg.

Pagliarin, S. (2018): Linking Processes and Patterns: Spatial Planning, Governance and Urban Sprawl in the Barcelona and Milan Metropolitan Regions. In: Urban Studies 55, 16, 3650–3668. DOI:

Pinson, G.; Sala Pala, V. (2007): Peut-on vraiment se passer de l’entretien en sociologie de l’action publique? In: Revue française de science politique 57, 5, 555–597. DOI:

Soaita, A.M. (2013): Romanian suburban housing: Home improvement through owner-building. In: Urban Studies 50, 10, 2084–2101. DOI:

Sohn C. (2014): The Border as a Resource in the Global Urban Space: A Contribution to the Cross-Border Metropolis Hypothesis. In: International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 38, 5, 1697-1711. DOI:

Swiss Federal Council (2002): Sustainable Development Strategy 2002. Bern.

van Dijk, T.; van der Vlist, A. (2015): On the interaction between landownership and regional designs for land development. In: Urban Studies 52, 10, 1899–1914. DOI:

Van den Hoek, D.; Spit, T.; Hartmann, T. (2020): Certain flexibilities in land-use plans. Towards a method for assessing flexibility. In: Land Use Policy 94, 104497, 1–8. DOI:

Vizzari, M.; Hilal, M.; Sigura, M.; Antognelli, S.; Joly, D. (2018): Urban-rural-natural gradient analysis with CORINE data: An application to the metropolitan France. In: Landscape and Urban Planning 171, 18–29. DOI:

Vlaamse Regering (2018): Strategische Visie Beleidsplan Ruimte Vlaanderen. Brussels.

Vlaamse Regering (2022): Conceptnota Bouwshift. Brussels.

Wishlade, F.; Michie, R.; Moodie, J.; Penje, O.; Norlen, G.; Korthals Altes, W.; Assirelli Pandolfi, C.; de la Fuente Abajo A. (2019): Financial Instruments and Territorial Cohesion. Synthesis Report. Luxembourg.



How to Cite

Le Bivic, C. and Idt, J. (2023) “Managing and controlling diffuse urbanisation in France: Spatial planning practices in cross-border city-regions”, Raumforschung und Raumordnung | Spatial Research and Planning. DE. doi: 10.14512/rur.1697.



Research Article