Socio-spatial relations and the governance of city-regional growth: A comparative analysis of two European high-tech regions

Robin Ganser; Dave Valler

doi:10.14512/rur.177

Authors

Robin Ganser HfWU
Dave Valler Oxford Brookes

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.14512/rur.177

Keywords:

Socio-spatial relations, city-regions, strategic planning, growth management, international comparative analysis

Abstract

Oxford-Oxfordshire, UK, and the Verband Region Stuttgart or the Metro Region in Germany are two of Europe’s high-tech powerhouses, facing similar challenges concerning housing and infrastructure provision and accommodating regional as well as local economic growth. Based on desktop studies and semi-structured expert interviews, this paper examines the respective institutional, political and cultural contexts for strategic planning in the two distinct settings, aiming to identify the evolving balance of socio-spatial dimensions influencing each case. While the interplay of territory, place, scale and network is different across the two cases, both face ongoing dilemmas. In the Stuttgart region, an established and smoothly running economic and spatial growth-machine has stuttered as growth has reached capacity and localities have asserted their constitutional controls on urban expansion. In Oxford (and the wider county of Oxfordshire), there has been a contrasting dislocation between an emerging growth agenda and a fractured governance context that is historically less oriented towards growth. Additionally, Oxfordshire has operated since 2010 against the background of localism in English planning and an increasing reliance on city and housing/growth ‘deals’ negotiated with central government to access planning flexibilities and infrastructure funding. Conclusions are drawn with the aim of mutual learning from the different international experiences and of informing approaches to strategic and inter-municipal planning.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Allmendinger, P.; Haughton, G.; Knieling, J.; Othengrafen, F. (eds.) (2015): Soft spaces in Europe: Re-negotiating governance, boundaries and borders. London. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315768403

Amin-Smith, N.; Phillips, D. (2019): English council funding: what’s happened and what’s next? London. = Institute for Fiscal Studies Briefing Note BN250. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1920/BN.IFS.2019.BN0250

Booth, P. (1993): The cultural dimension in comparative research: Making sense of development control in France. In: European Planning Studies 1, 2, 217–229. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654319308720210 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09654319308720210

Booth, P. (2011): Culture, planning and path dependence: Some reflections on the problems of comparison. In: Town Planning Review82, 1, 13–28. https://doi.org/10.3828/tpr.2011.4 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3828/tpr.2011.4

Briant, N. (2019): Boos during key South Oxfordshire District Council Local Plan meeting. In: Oxford Mail, 12 October 2019.

Brownill, S.; Cho, Y.; Keivani, R.; Nase, I.; Downing, L.; Valler, D.; Whitehouse, N.; Bernstock, P. (2015): Rethinking planning obligations: balancing housing numbers and affordability. York.

CDC – Cherwell District Council (2018): ‘The Oxfordshire Housing and Growth Deal’ Report of the Chief Executive to CDC Executive, 26 February 2018. Bodicote, Oxfordshire.

Frank, A.; Morgan, K. (2012): Re-inventing the city: The art of metro-governance in the Stuttgart region. Cardiff. = Papers in Planning Research 186.

Granath Hansson, A. (2019): Inclusionary housing policies in Gothenburg, Sweden, and Stuttgart, Germany: The importance of norms and institutions. In: Nordic Journal of Surveying and Real Estate Research 14, 1, 7–28. https://doi.org/10.30672/njsr.75140 DOI: https://doi.org/10.30672/njsr.75140

Hagemann, H.; Christ, J.P.; Rukwid, R. (2011): Die Bedeutung von Innovationsclustern, sektoralen und regionalen Innovationssystemen zur Stärkung der globalen Wettbewerbsfähigkeit der baden-württembergischen Wirtschaft. Hohenheim.

Harrison, J. (2010): Networks of connectivity, territorial fragmentation, uneven development: The new politics of city-regionalism. In: Political Geography 29, 1, 17–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polgeo.2009.12.002 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polgeo.2009.12.002

Harrison, J. (2013): Configuring the new ‘regional world’: On being caught between territory and networks. In: Regional Studies 47, 1, 55–74. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2011.644239 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2011.644239

Haughton, G.; Allmendinger, P.; Oosterlynck, S. (2013): Spaces of neoliberal experimentation: soft spaces, postpolitics, and neoliberal governmentality. In: Environment and Planning A 45, 1, 217–234. https://doi.org/10.1068/a45121 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1068/a45121

Heeg, S. (2003): Governance in the Stuttgart Metropolitan Region. In: Salet, W.; Thornley, A.; Kreukels, A. (eds.): Metropolitan governance and spatial planning. Comparative case studies of European city-regions. London, 163–174.

Heilmann, S.; Perry, E.J. (2011): Embracing uncertainty: Guerrilla policy style and adaptive governance in China. In: Perry, E.J.; Heilmann, S. (eds.): Mao’s Invisible Hand: The Political Foundations of Adaptive Governance in China. Cambridge, 1–29. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/9781684171163_002

Huggins, R.; Thompson, P.; Prokop, D. (2019): UK Competitiveness Index 2019. Cardiff.

Jessop, B. (2016a): Territory, politics, governance and multispatial metagovernance. In: Territory, Politics, Governance 4, 1, 8–32. https://doi.org/10.1080/21622671.2015.1123173 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/21622671.2015.1123173

Jessop, B. (2016b): The State: Past, Present, Future. Cambridge.

Jessop, B.; Brenner, N.; Jones, M. (2008): Theorizing sociospatial relations. In: Environment and planning D 26, 3, 389–401. https://doi.org/10.1068/d9107 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1068/d9107

Jones, M. (2018): The march of governance and the actualities of failure: The case of economic development twenty years on. In: International Social Science Journal 68, 227-228, 25–41. https://doi.org/10.1111/issj.12169 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/issj.12169

Jones, M.; Jessop, B. (2010): Thinking state/space incompossibly. In: Antipode 42, 5, 1119–1149. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8330.2010.00796.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8330.2010.00796.x

Kennett, P.; Jones, G.; Meegan, R.; Croft, J. (2015): Recession, austerity and the ‘great risk shift’: Local government and household impacts and responses in Bristol and Liverpool. In: Local Government Studies, 41, 4, 622–644. https://doi.org/10.1080/03003930.2015.1036986 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/03003930.2015.1036986

Lloyds Bank (2019): Press Release: UK’s most and least affordable cities revealed. London.

Monk, S.; Crook, T.; Lister, D.; Lovatt, R.; Ni Luanaigh, A.; Rowley, S.; Whitehead, C. (2006): Delivering affordable housing through Section 106 Outputs and outcomes. York.

Müller, R. (2021): Stuttgart – ein Gang durch die Stadtgeschichte. In: Aus Politik und Zeitgeschichte 5‑6, 12–19.

MW – Ministerium für Wirtschaft, Arbeit und Wohnungsbau Baden-Württemberg (2017): Plausibilitätsprüfung der Bauflächenbedarfsnachweise im Rahmen des Genehmigungsverfahrens nach §§ 6 und 10 Abs. 2 BauGB. Stuttgart.

Nadin, V. (2012): International comparative planning methodology: Introduction to the theme issue. In: Planning Practice and Research 27, 1, 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1080/02697459.2012.669928 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/02697459.2012.669928

Nadin, V.; Stead, D. (2013): Opening up the compendium: An evaluation of international comparative planning research methodologies. In: European Planning Studies 21, 10, 1542–1561. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2012.722958 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2012.722958

O’Brien, P.; Pike, A. (2015): City deals, decentralisation and the governance of local infrastructure funding and financing in the UK. In: National Institute Economic Review 233, 1, R14–R26. https://doi.org/10.1177/002795011523300103 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/002795011523300103

Oliver, M. (2016): Major road and rail projects across Oxfordshire set to lose out on millions. In: Oxford Mail, 6 December 2016.

Oliver, M. (2017): ‘Super council’ row escalates on social media as Oxford City Council launches petition against plan. In: Oxford Mail, 14 February 2017.

Othengrafen, F.; Galland, D. (2019): International Comparative Planning. In: Green Leigh, N.; French, S.P.; Guhathakurta, S.; Stiftel, B. (eds.): The Routledge Handbook of International Planning Education. New York, 217–226. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315661063-19

OxLEP – Oxfordshire Local Enterprise Partnership (2018): Oxfordshire: a trailblazer for the UK economy: 2018 Economic Review Baseline. Oxford.

Phelps, N.A.; Valler, D. (2018): Urban development and the politics of dissonance. In: Territory, Politics, Governance 6, 1, 81–103. https://doi.org/10.1080/21622671.2016.1231629 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/21622671.2016.1231629

Reimer, M.; Getimis, P.; Blotevogel, H.H. (eds.) (2014): Spatial planning systems and practices in Europe. A comparative perspective on continuity and changes. New York. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315852577

RNVA – Regionalverband Neckar-Alb (2013) Regionalplan Neckar-Alb 2013. Mössingen.

Rodríguez-Pose, A. (2008): The rise of the “city-region” concept and its development policy implications. In: European Planning Studies 16, 8, 1025–1046. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654310802315567 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09654310802315567

Sandford, M.; Ayres, S.; Flinders, M. (2017): Devolution revolution? Assessing central-local relationships in England’s devolution deals. http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/84691/1/politicsandpolicy-devolution-revolution-reassessing-englands.pdf (09.08.2022).

Sanierungs- und Entwicklungsgesellschaft Ostfildern (2017): Scharnhauser Park – ein neuer Stadtteil entsteht, 1990 – 2016. Ostfildern.

Sanyal, B. (ed.) (2005): Comparative planning cultures. New York.

Scott, A.; Storper, M. (2003): Regions, globalization, development. In: Regional Studies 37, 6‑7, 579–593. https://doi.org/10.1080/0034340032000108697a DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/0034340032000108697a

Shaw, K.; Tewdwr-Jones, M. (2017): “Disorganised devolution”: Reshaping metropolitan governance in England in a period of austerity. In: Raumforschung und Raumordnung | Spatial Research and Planning 75, 3, 211–224. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13147-016-0435-2 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13147-016-0435-2

Turok, I. (2008): A new policy for Britain’s cities: choices, challenges, contradictions. In: Local Economy 23, 2, 149–166. https://doi.org/10.1080/02690940801976224 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/02690940801976224

Valler, D. (2020): Once more unto the breach? Devolution and local government reorganisation. In: Oxfordshire Regional Studies Association Blog. https://www.regionalstudies.org/news/once-more-unto-the-breach-devolution-and-local-government-reorganisation-in-oxfordshire/ (11.08.2022).

Valler, D.; Jonas, A.E.; Robinson, L. (2021): Evaluating regional spatial imaginaries: the Oxford-Cambridge Arc. In: Territory, Politics, Governance. https://doi.org/10.1080/21622671.2020.1851751 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/21622671.2020.1851751

VRS – Verband Region Stuttgart (2010): Regionalplan 2009/2010. Stuttgart.

VRS – Verband Region Stuttgart (2015): Indikatoren zur Freiraumqualität in der Region Stuttgart. Stuttgart.

VRS – Verband Region Stuttgart (2018): Regionalverkehrsplan Region Stuttgart. Stuttgart.

VRS – Verband Region Stuttgart; HWK – Handwerkskammer Region Stuttgart; IHK – Industrie- und Handelskammer Region Stuttgart; IGM – IG Metall Region Stuttgart (eds.) (2019): Strukturbericht Region Stuttgart 2019. Entwicklung von Wirtschaft und Beschäftigung. Stuttgart.

Wall, R.; Vilela, N.B. (2016): Deal or no deal: English Devolution, a top-down approach. In: Lex Localis – Journal of Local Self-Government 14, 3, 655–670. https://doi.org/10.4335/14.3.655-670(2016) DOI: https://doi.org/10.4335/14.3.655-670(2016)

While, A.; Jonas, A.E.; Gibbs, D. C. (2004): Unblocking the city? Growth pressures, collective provision, and the search for new spaces of governance in Greater Cambridge, England. In: Environment and Planning A 36, 2, 279–304. https://doi.org/10.1068/a3615 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1068/a3615