Tackling municipal growth dependencies through the ‘common good’. Municipal-led collaborative housing in Freiburg’s Kleineschholz development

Benedikt Schmid

doi:10.14512/rur.3104

Authors

Benedikt Schmid Institut für Umweltsozialwissenschaften und Geographie, Albert-Ludwigs-Universität Freiburg

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.14512/rur.3104

Keywords:

Urban planning, common good, growth dependency, concept-based tendering, collaborative housing, Freiburg

Abstract

This paper examines the potential of centering the common good in urban development as a way to address municipal growth dependencies – the structural link between market performance and municipalities’ capacity to fulfil their responsibilities. It builds on growing evidence of the contradictions and limits inherent in marketization and financialization. Using a practice-theoretical approach, the paper develops a perspective for tracing how municipal growth dependencies are enacted and negotiated in everyday practice. In doing so, it highlights the partial agency of local authorities as they navigate between market-driven and common-good-oriented forms of development. Empirically, the paper analyses Kleineschholz, an ongoing district development project in Freiburg, Germany, that explicitly departs from short-term calculation in favour of long-term, strategic planning. Through concept-based tendering, the local authority exclusively addresses actors it deems oriented toward the common good, such as collaborative housing groups. The findings show that a strong – though imperfect – culture of communication, combined with flexible use of planning and building law instruments, enables permanent rent reductions below market rates and supports the emergence of a needs-oriented neighbourhood economy. These developments point toward more equitable provisioning systems that increase resilience from economic cycles. At the same time, persistent barriers to participation, the creation of new building stock, and the context-specific nature of Kleineschholz raise critical questions regarding overall sustainability impacts and the broader transferability of the model.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Aalbers, M.B. (2017): The Financialization of Housing: A Political Economy Approach. London.

Baffoe, G. (2023): Neoliberal urban development and the polarization of urban governance. In: Cities 143, 104570. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2023.104570

Beveridge, R.; Naumann, M. (2023): Progressive Urbanism in Small Towns: The Contingencies of Governing from the Left. In: Urban Affairs Review 59, 1, 43–72. https://doi.org/10.1177/10780874211055834

Bianchi, I. (2023): The commonification of the public under new municipalism: Commons-state institutions in Naples and Barcelona. In: Urban Studies 60, 11, 2116–2132. https://doi.org/10.1177/00420980221101460

Binswanger, M. (2019): Der Wachstumszwang: Warum die Volkswirtschaft immer weiterwachsen muss, selbst wenn wir genug haben. Weinheim.

Blum, C. (2015): Die Bestimmung des Gemeinwohls. Berlin.

Boeth, H.; Kühn, M. (2022): Wachstumskoalitionen und Wachstumskritiken in der Stadtentwicklung: Reurbanisierungs- und Zuwanderungspolitiken. In: Raumforschung und Raumordnung | Spatial Research and Planning 80, 6, 743–756. https://doi.org/10.14512/rur.161

Bogumil, J.; Holtkamp, L. (2023): Kommunalpolitik und Kommunalverwaltung: eine praxisorientierte Einführung. Bonn.

Czischke, D.; Carriou, C.; Lang, R. (2020): Collaborative Housing in Europe: Conceptualizing the Field. In: Housing, Theory and Society 37, 1, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1080/14036096.2020.1703611

Dang, L.; Seemann, A.-K. (2021): The role of collaborative housing initiatives in public value co-creation – a case study of Freiburg, Germany. In: Voluntary Sector Review 12, 1, 59–80. https://doi.org/10.1332/204080520X15822993230122

Dewilde, C. (2018): Explaining the declined affordability of housing for low-income private renters across Western Europe. In: Urban Studies 55, 12, 2618–2639. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098017729077

Döring, T.; Zimmermann, H. (2025): Is post-growth a desirable basis for spatial sciences and planning? A critical view from a green growth perspective. In: Raumforschung und Raumordnung | Spatial Research and Planning 83, 3, 190–204. https://doi.org/10.14512/rur.3011

Eckersley, R. (2021): Greening states and societies: from transitions to great transformations. In: Environmental Politics 30, 1‑2, 245–265. https://doi.org/10.1080/09644016.2020.1810890

Fanning, A.L.; Raworth, K. (2025): Doughnut of social and planetary boundaries monitors a world out of balance. In: Nature 646, 8083, 47–56. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-025-09385-1

Farmer, S.; Poulos, C.D. (2019): The financialising local growth machine in Chicago. In: Urban Studies 56, 7, 1404–1425. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098018801564

Fastenrath, S.; Preller, B. (2018): Freiburg: The Emblematic Green City. In: Affolderbach, J.; Schulz, C. (eds.): Green Building Transitions. Regional Trajectories of Innovation in Europe, Canada and Australia. Cham, 69–98. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-77709-2_5

Feola, G. (2020): Capitalism in sustainability transitions research: Time for a critical turn? In: Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions 35, 241–250. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eist.2019.02.005

Freier, R.; Geißler, R.; Raffer, C.; Scheller, H. (2025): Kommunaler Finanzreport 2025: Knappe Kassen, große Aufgaben. Gütersloh. https://doi.org/10.11586/2025059

Götze, V.; Hartmann, T. (2021): Why municipalities grow: The influence of fiscal incentives on municipal land policies in Germany and the Netherlands. In: Land Use Policy 109, 105681. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2021.105681

Gould, K.A.; Lewis, T.L. (2017): Green Gentrification: Urban Sustainability and the Struggle for Environmental Justice. London.

Grossmann, M.; Creamer, E. (2017): Assessing diversity and inclusivity within the Transition movement: an urban case study. In: Environmental Politics 26, 1, 161–182. https://doi.org/10.1080/09644016.2016.1232522

Guinan J.; O’Neill, M. (2020): The Case for Community Wealth Building. Cambridge.

Haberl, H.; Wiedenhofer, D.; Virág, D.; Kalt, G.; Plank, B.; Brockway, P.; Fishman, T.; Hausknost, D.; Krausmann, F.; Leon-Gruchalski, B.; Mayer, A.; Pichler, M.; Schaffartzik, A.; Sousa, T.; Streeck, J.; Creutzig, F. (2020): A systematic review of the evidence on decoupling of GDP, resource use and GHG emissions, part II: synthesizing the insights. In: Environmental Research Letters 15, 6, 1–42. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ab842a

Harding, A. (1991): The Rise of Urban Growth Coalitions, UK-Style? In: Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy 9, 3, 295–317. https://doi.org/10.1068/c090295

Jeske, J.I.; Hagbert, P.; Engström, E. (2024): Sustainability potentials of collaborative housing and the barriers to realisation: a systematic review. In: International Journal of Housing Policy. https://doi.org/10.1080/19491247.2024.2438270

Kallert, A.; Dudek, S. (2025): The rural consolidation state: A critical examination of municipal consolidation strategies in Bavaria, Germany. In: Political Geography 121, 103379. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polgeo.2025.103379

Kallis, G.; Hickel, J.; O’Neill, D.W.; Jackson, T.; Victor, P.A.; Raworth, K.; Schor, J.B.; Steinberger, J.K.; Ürge-Vorsatz, D. (2025): Post-growth: The science of wellbeing within planetary boundaries. In: The Lancet Planetary Health 9, 1, e62–e78. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2542-5196(24)00310-3

Knak, A. (2021): Wachstumstreiber und Suffizienzhindernisse auf kommunaler Ebene. Flensburg.

Lamker, C.; Schulze Dieckhoff, V. (2022): New roles in collective, growth-independent spatial organisation. In: Lange, B.; Hülz, M.; Schmid, B.; Schulz, C. (eds.): Post-Growth Geographies. Spatial Relations of Diverse and Alternative Economies. Bielefeld, 347–362. https://doi.org/10.14361/9783839457337-025

Lamker, C.; Terfrüchte, T. (2024): Post-Growth Ambitions and Growth-Based Realities in Sustainable Land-Use Planning. In: Urban Planning 9, 7881. https://doi.org/10.17645/up.7881

Lange, B.; Hülz, M.; Schmid, B.; Schulz, C. (2022): Post-Growth Geographies. Spatial Relations of Diverse and Alternative Economies. Bielefeld. https://doi.org/10.14361/9783839457337

Meehan, J. (2014): Reinventing Real Estate: The Community Land Trust as a Social Invention in Affordable Housing. In: Journal of Applied Social Science 8, 2, 113–133. https://doi.org/10.1177/1936724413497480

Münter, A. (2024): (Neue) Flächenansprüche und der Stillstand beim Flächensparen. In: Raumentwicklung – ARL-Journal für Wissenschaft und Praxis 54, 2‑3, 18–23. https://doi.org/10.60683/kqxm-w092

Patel, R.; Moore, J.W. (2018): A History of the World in Seven Cheap Things: A Guide to Capitalism, Nature, and the Future of the Planet. London.

Paul, F.C.; Cumbers, A. (2023): The return of the local state? Failing neoliberalism, remunicipalisation, and the role of the state in advanced capitalism. In: Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space 55, 1, 165–183. https://doi.org/10.1177/0308518X211050407

Pavillon für Alle (2024): Infopost – Spezialausgabe (Wohnprojekte-Portraits). Freiburg. https://pavillonfueralle.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/10/Spezialausgabe-Wohnprojekteportraits-Oktober-2024-1.pdf (14.10.2025).

Peck, J.; Theodore, N.; Brenner, N. (2013): Neoliberal Urbanism Redux? In: International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 37, 3, 1091–1099. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2427.12066

Petschow, U.; aus dem Moore, N.; Hofmann, D.; Pissarskoi, E.; Lange, S. (2022): Cornerstones and positions of a precautionary post-growth economy: The end of the growth-based model of prosperity. In: Lange, B.; Hülz, M.; Schmid, B.; Schulz, C. (eds.): Post-Growth Geographies. Spatial Relations of Diverse and Alternative Economies. Bielefeld, 323–346. https://doi.org/10.14361/9783839457337-024

Richters, O.; Siemoneit, A. (2019): Growth imperatives: Substantiating a contested concept. In: Structural Change and Economic Dynamics 51, 126–137. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.strueco.2019.07.012

Ritzinger, A. (2018): Flächensparen zwischen Anspruch und Wirklichkeit. Zur Rolle von Akteuren und Steuerungsinstrumenten in Dorferneuerungsprozessen. In: Raumforschung und Raumordnung | Spatial Research and Planning 76, 5, 395–406. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13147-018-0539-y

Rydin, Y. (2013): The Future of Planning: Beyond Growth Dependence. Bristol. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctt9qgwg6

Savini, F.; Ferreira, A.; von Schönfeld, K. (2022): Post-Growth Planning: Cities Beyond the Market Economy. New York. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003160984

Scheller, D.; Thörn, H. (2018): Governing ‘Sustainable Urban Development’ through Self-Build Groups and Co-Housing: The Cases of Hamburg and Gothenburg. In: International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 42, 5, 914–933.

Schmid, B. (2025): The spectre of growth in urban transformations: Insights from two Doughnut-oriented municipalities on the negotiation of local development pathways. In: Urban Studies 62, 11, 2222–2241. https://doi.org/10.1177/00420980241305322

Schmid, B.; Fricke, C.; Zengerling, C. (2024): Towards a “Freiburg Model” of Housing for the Common Good? Fostering Collaborative Housing in Urban Development. In: Urban Planning 9, 11–18. https://doi.org/10.17645/up.8191

Schmid, B.; Smith, T.; Aiken, G.T. (2021): Governing through community: Transformative geographies from the bottom up. In: Environmental Policy and Governance 31, 3, 155–158. https://doi.org/10.1002/eet.1928

Schröer, C. (2024): Gemeinwohlorientierte Quartiersentwicklung. Eine Untersuchung von Aushandlungsprozessen und Vorstellungen von Gemeinwohl im Kontext neoliberaler Stadtentwicklung am Beispiel Kleineschholz in Freiburg im Breisgau. Freiburg.

Schuppert, G.F. (2002): Gemeinwohl, das. Oder: Über die Schwierigkeit, dem Gemeinwohlbegriff Konturen zu verleihen. In: Schuppert, G. F.; Neidhardt, F. (eds.): Gemeinwohl – Auf der Suche nach Substanz. Berlin, 19–64.

Stadt Freiburg (2006): Beiträge zur Statistik: Bürgerentscheid am 12. November 2006. Freiburg. https://fritz.freiburg.de/Bibliothek/statistik_veroeffentlichungen_buergerentscheid-2006.pdf (14.10.2025).

Stadt Freiburg (2013): Kommunales Handlungsprogramm Wohnen in Freiburg: Anlage zur Drucksache G‑13/110. Freiburg. https://www.freiburg.de/pb/site/Freiburg/get/params_E959934397/417642/Handlungsprogramm_Wohnen.pdf (14.10.2025).

Stadt Freiburg (2020): Bezahlbar Wohnen 2030. Anlage zur Drucksache G‑20/134. Freiburg. https://www.freiburg.de/pb/site/Freiburg/get/params_E-318026111/1770796/Gesamtkonzept_Wohnen.pdf (14.10.2025).

Stadt Freiburg (2021) Drucksache G‑21/197: Beschluss der Städtebaulichen Entwicklungsmaßnahme Kleineschholz und der Sonderrechnung Kleineschholz für 2022 mit Kosten- und Finanzierungsübersicht. Freiburg.

Stadt Freiburg (2023a): Bunte Vielfalt an Projekten in Kleineschholz. In: Amtsblatt der Stadt Freiburg 37, 877, 18–19.

Stadt Freiburg (2023b): Drucksache G‑23/201: Quartier „Kleineschholz“ – Vermarktungskonzept, kommunale Förderung und Abweichung von der städtischen Ablöserichtlinie für Stellplätze. Freiburg.

Stadt Freiburg (2024): Drucksache G‑24/178: Beschlussvorlage: Quartier Kleineschholz – Vergabe von Baugrundstücken im Rahmen einer Konzeptvergabe. Freiburg.

Theodore, N. (2020): Governing through austerity: (Il)logics of neoliberal urbanism after the global financial crisis. In: Journal of Urban Affairs 42, 1, 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/07352166.2019.1623683

Thompson, M. (2021): What’s so new about New Municipalism? In: Progress in Human Geography 45, 2, 317–342. https://doi.org/10.1177/0309132520909480

Torfing, J.; Payandeh, R.; Jalili, S.M.; Banafi, M. (2025): A systematic review of conflict within collaborative governance. In: Policy and Politics. https://doi.org/10.1332/03055736Y2025D000000070

Weck, S.; Ritzinger, A. (2021): Co-producing just and sustainable localities: emphasising the role of local authorities in current practices in Germany. In: Die Erde 152, 4, 232–243. https://doi.org/10.12854/erde-2021-583