Größenvorteile, Skaleneffizienz und Wettbewerb zwischen Gebietskörperschaften bei der Produktion öffentlicher Güter: Evidenz aus der Schweiz

Philippe K. Widmer; George Elias; Peter Zweifel

doi:10.1007/s13147-013-0239-6

Authors

Philippe K. Widmer Institut für Volkswirtschaft, Universität Zürich, Blümlisalpstraße 10, 8006, Zürich, Schweiz
George Elias Polynomics AG, Baslerstraße 44, 4600, Olten, Schweiz
Peter Zweifel Institut für Volkswirtschaft, Universität Zürich, Blümlisalpstraße 10, 8006, Zürich, Schweiz

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1007/s13147-013-0239-6

Keywords:

Data Envelopment Analysis, Efficiency measurement, Economies of scale, Public good provision, Switzerland

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is to analyze the optimal scale of local jurisdictions (cantons) in Switzerland applying Data Envelopment Analysis to the years 2000–2004. Aggregate output performance indicators for four local government activities (administration, education, health, and transportation) are used to measure technical and scale efficiency and to derive Data Envelopment Analysis scores. Results show that these public services fail to exhibit economies of scale, undermining quests for centralization of public good provision while suggesting the possibility of Tiebout competition.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Afonso, A.; Schuknecht, L.; Tanzi, V. (2006): Public sector efficiency: Evidence for new EU member states and emerging markets. Frankfurt am Main. = European Central Bank, Working Paper Series, No. 581.

Andersen, P.; Petersen, N. C. (1993): A procedure for ranking efficient units in data envelopment analysis. In: Management Science 39, 10, 1261–1264.

Baleiras, R. N. (2001): To fragment or to consolidate jurisdictions: the optimal architecture of government. Lissabon. = Faculdade de Economia, Universidade Nova de Lisboa, Working Paper Series, No. 401.

Banker, R. D.; Charnes, A.; Cooper, W. W. (1984): Some models for estimating technical and scale inefficiencies in data envelopment analysis. In: Management Science 30, 9, 1078–1092.

Bogetoft, P.; Otto, L. (2011): Benchmarking with DEA, SFA, and R. New York.

Charnes, A.; Cooper, W. W.; Rhodes, E. (1979): Measuring the efficiency of decision-making units. In: European Journal of Operational Research 3, 4, 429–444.

Ecoplan (2009): Kostenrelevanz und Gewichtung von Indikatoren im Lastenausgleich. Im Auftrag der Eidgenössischen Finanzverwaltung. Bern.

Eidgenössisches Finanzdepartement (2007): Neugestaltung des Finanzausgleichs und der Aufgabenteilung zwischen Bund und Kantonen. Bern.

Farrell, M. J. (1957): The measurement of productive efficiency. In: Journal of the Royal Statistical Scociety 120, 3, 253–281.

Frey, B. S. (2005): Functional, overlapping, competing jurisdictions: Redrawing the geographic borders of administration. In: European Journal of Law Reform V, 3–4, 543–555.

Gómez Reino, J. L. (2011): Essays on optimal jurisdictional size for local service delivery. Cambridge.

Koopmans, T. (1951): An analysis of production as an efficient combination of activities. In: Koopmans, T. (Hrsg.): Activity Analysis of Production and Allocation. New York, 33–97.

Oates, W. E. (1972): Fiscal Federalism. Princeton.

Oates, W. E. (2006): On the theory and practice of fiscal decentralization. Lexington. = Working Paper 2006–05, Institute for Federalism & Intergovernmental Relations.

Olson, M. (1969): The principle of “fiscal equivalence”: The division of responsibilities among different levels of government. In: American Economic Review 59, 2, 479–487.

Shah, A. (2004): Fiscal decentralization in developing and transition economies: Progress, problems, and the promise. Washington DC. = World Bank Policy Research Working Paper, No. 3282.

Simar, L.; Wilson, P. W. (1998): Sensitivity analysis of efficiency scores: How to bootstrap in nonparametric frontier models. In: Management Science 44, 1, 49–61.

Simar, L.; Wilson, P. W. (2000): Statistical inference in nonparametric frontier models: The state of the art. In: Journal of Productivity Analysis 13, 1, 49–78.

Tiebout, C. M. (1956): A Pure Theory of Local Expenditures. In: Journal of Political Economy 64, 5, 416–424.

Widmer, P.; Zweifel, P. (2012): Fiscal equalization, tiebout competition, and incentives for efficiency in a federalist country. In: Public Finance Review 40, 1, 3–29.