Planning for Cross-Border Territories: The Role Played by Spatial Information

Authors

  • Jean Peyrony Mission Opérationnelle Transfrontalière, 38, rue des Bourdonnais, 75001, Paris, France
  • Olivier Denert Mission Opérationnelle Transfrontalière, 38, rue des Bourdonnais, 75001, Paris, France

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1007/s13147-012-0156-0

Keywords:

Cross-border cooperation, Cross-border territory, Spatial planning, Spatial information, Multi-level governance

Abstract

The authors argue that cross-border territories require not only an integrated approach to development, but also a form of cross-border governance that is democratic and pursues a multi-stage strategy in order to ensure accountability towards citizens and socio-economic actors and make certain that they are acknowledged and receive support at a regional and national level. At present, relevant statistical indices are lacking for most cross-border territories. Such indices are essential, however, for establishing a shared body of regional knowledge as a basis for developing joint policies and activities. Shared border areas presuppose that development takes place on both sides in order to overcome the negative effects of borders, to fully exploit the potential arising from the development of projects, and to address the needs of the inhabitants.

This article examines the part played by spatial information in the planning of cross-border areas. It examines the concept of “cross-border territory”, shows the diverse criteria applied in European regional planning as exemplified in the border region of France and Luxemburg, and considers which tools are available—from the standpoint of multi-level governance—for this purpose. Ultimately, it is a question of addressing the needs, challenges and potential offered by spatial information in a cross-border context.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Amilhat-Szary, A. L.; Fourny, M.-C. (2006): Après les frontières, avec la frontière. Nouvelles dynamiques transfrontalières en Europe. La Tour d’Aigues.

Auburtin, E. (2008): Approche électorale du sentiment européen des Lorrains et des Luxembourgeois à partir de l’analyse des résultats du référendum de 2005 sur la constitution européenne. In: Mosella: Acte du colloque: Frontières et aménagement XXXIII, 1–4. 259–276.

Beckouche, P. (2001): Le Royaume des frères. Aux sources de l’État-nation. Paris.

Bleton-Ruget, A.; Commerçon, N.; Gonod, P. (2006): Territoires institutionnels, territoires fonctionnels. Macon.

BMVBS (Bundesministerium für Verkehr, Bau und Stadtentwicklung) (2006): Leitbilder und Handlungsstrategien für die Raumentwicklung in Deutschland, verabschiedet von der Ministerkonferenz für Raumordnung am 30. Juni 2006. Berlin.

DATAR (La Délégation interministérielle à l’Aménagement du Territoire et à l’Attractivité Régionale) (2002): Aménager la France de 2020. Mettre les territoires en mouvement. La Documentation française. Paris.

European Commission (1999): European Spatial Development Perspective. Towards Balanced and Sustainable Development of the Territory of the European Union. Luxembourg.

European Commission (2001): European Governance. A White Paper. Brussels.

European Commission (2008a): Green paper on territorial cohesion. Turning territorial diversity into strength. Brussels.

European Commission (2008b): Fostering the Urban dimension. Analysis of the Operational Programmes co-financed by the European Regional Development Fund (2007–2013). Brussels.

European Commission (2009): European Strategy for the Baltic Sea Region. Communication from the Commission. Brussels.

European Commission (2010): Ex-Post Evaluation of INTERREG III Community Initiative (2000/2006). Online:http://ec.europa.eu/regional_policy/sources/docgener/evaluation/expost2006/interreg_en.htm (accessed 12.09.2011).

European Council; European Parliament (2006): Regulation on a European Grouping of Territorial Cooperation (EGTC). Luxembourg.

EUROMOT (European Network of Cross-Border Local Authorities) (2009): Contribution of MOT and EUROMOT on the Green Paper on European Territorial Cohesion. Online:http://www.espaces-transfrontaliers.org/docdivers/contribution_euromot_green_paper_EN.pdf (accessed 12.09.2011).

Faludi, A. (2009): Territorial Cohesion under the Looking Glass. Online:http://ec.europa.eu/regional_policy/archive/consultation/terco/pdf/lookingglass.pdf (accessed 12.02.2012).

Faludi, A.; Peyrony, J. (2011): Cohesion Policy Contributing to Territorial Cohesion—Future Scenarios. In: European Journal of Spatial Development 43, 1–21.

Foucher, M. (2007): L’obsession des frontières. Paris.

Fremont, A. (1976): La région, espace vécu. Paris.

Groupe de Travail Parlementaire Franco-Belge (2006): Rapport du Groupe de travail parlementaire franco-belge sur le développement de la coopération transfrontalière entre la France et la Belgique. Online:http://www.espaces-transfrontaliers.org/docdivers/RP_FB_2007.pdf (accessed 19.09.2011).

Gualini, E. (2003): Cross-border Governance: Inventing Regions in a Trans-national Multi-level Polity. In: DISP 152, 2, 43–52.

Hooghe, L.; Marks, G. (2003): Unraveling the Central State, but How? Types of Multi-level Governance. In: American Political Science Review 97, 2, 233–243.

Informal Ministerial Meeting on Urban Development and Territorial Cohesion (2007): Territorial Agenda of the European Union. Towards a more Competitive and Sustainable Europe of Diverse Regions. Leipzig.

Informal Ministerial Meeting of Ministers responsible for Spatial Planning and Territorial Development (2011): Territorial Agenda of the European Union 2020. Towards an Inclusive, Smart and Sustainable Europe of Diverse Regions. Gödöllö.

Levy, J.; Lussault, M. (2003): Dictionnaire de la géographie et de l’espace des sociétés. Paris.

MOT (Mission Opérationnelle Transfrontalière) (2003): Les agglomérations transfrontalières. Paris. = Les Cahiers de la MOT, Nr. 3.

MOT (Mission Opérationnelle Transfrontalière) (2005): L’intercommunalité transfrontalière. Paris. = Les Cahiers de la MOT, Nr. 5.

MOT (Mission Opérationnelle Transfrontalière) (2006): Problématiques foncières et immobilières au sein des agglomérations transfrontalières de Genève et de Bâle. Paris. Online:http://www.espaces-transfrontaliers.org/document/synthese_etude_foncier.pdf (accessed 12.09.2011).

MOT (Mission Opérationnelle Transfrontalière) (2007): Atlas de la coopération transfrontalière. Paris.

MOT (Mission Opérationnelle Transfrontalière) (2008a): Le groupement européen de coopération territoriale. Paris. = Les Cahiers de la MOT, Nr. 7.

MOT (Mission Opérationnelle Transfrontalière) (2008b): Proceedings “Cross-border territories: day-to-day Europe”. European Conference, 8 and 9 November 2007 in Lille—France. Paris. Online:http://www.espaces-transfrontaliers.org/Colloque/ACTES_EN.pdf (accessed 12.09.2011).

MOT (Mission Opérationnelle Transfrontalière); Institut IGEAT de l’Université libre de Bruxelles (2006): Bonnes pratiques de gouvernance dans les agglomérations transfrontalières en Europe. Online:http://www.espaces-transfrontaliers.org/detail_document.php?idoc=269 (accessed 12.09.2011).

MOT (Mission Opérationnelle Transfrontalière); Lamour, C. (2008): Expertising Governance for Transfrontier Conurbations. Online:http://urbact.eu/en/projects/metropolitan-governance/egtc/homepage/ (accessed 12.09.2011).

OECD (2003): Territorial Review of Öresund. Paris.

Perkmann, M. (1999): Building Governance Institutions Across European Borders. In: Regional Studies 33, 7, 657–667.

Perkmann, M. (2007): Construction of New Territorial Scales: A Framework and Case Study of the EUREGIO Cross-border Region. In: Regional Studies 41, 2, 253–266.

Peyrony, J. (2002): Le schéma de développement de l’espace communautaire. Territoires en mouvement. La Documentation française. Paris.

Richardson, T. (2006): The thin simplification of European space: dangerous calculations? In: Comparative European Politics 4, 2/3, 203–217.

Downloads

Published

2012-06-30

Issue

Section

Policy and practice perspective

How to Cite

1.
Peyrony J, Denert O. Planning for Cross-Border Territories: The Role Played by Spatial Information. RuR [Internet]. 2012 Jun. 30 [cited 2024 May 25];70(3):229–240. Available from: https://rur.oekom.de/index.php/rur/article/view/854