Partizipation in Reallaboren in neuem Licht?! Ein Ansatz, die Lücke zwischen ko-kreativer und deliberativer Partizipation zu schließen

Autor/innen

  • Marco Sonnberger Universtität Stuttgart
  • Doris Lindner Universtität Stuttgart

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.14512/rur.27

Schlagwörter:

Real-world laboratory, Co-creation, Participation, Deliberation, Real-world experiments, Sustainability

Abstract

Sustainability-oriented real-world laboratories involve the co-design and co-creation of knowledge, based on a transdisciplinary cooperation between actors from different social worlds – academia, the administration, business, civil society – each endowed with specific interests, resources and worldviews. Sustainability-oriented real-world laboratories claim to be a means of inclusive participation in the co-creative shaping of solutions for socioecological issues and exploring pathways to sustainability. In the literature dealing with sustainability-oriented real-world laboratories, participation is thus mainly understood as active involvement by civil society, change agents and citizens in processes of experimentation and the implementation of solutions. We call this co-creative participation. However, participation in talk-based opinion formation and decision-making processes – we call this deliberative participation – is hardly discussed in the respective literature. In this paper, we argue that co-creative and deliberative participation are two forms of participation which can be conceptualized differently but which are both relevant for successful experimentation in sustainability-oriented real-world laboratories and are mainly intertwined in practice. We propose an ideal-typical conceptual framework for participation in sustainability-oriented real-world laboratories that combines co-creative and deliberative participation. The aim is to contribute to a systematization of, and rationale for, different forms of participation in real-world laboratories.

Downloads

Download-Daten sind nocht nicht verfügbar.

Literaturhinweise

Alcántara, S.; Bach, N.; Kuhn, R.; Ullrich, P. (2016): Demokratietheorie und Partizipationspraxis. Analyse und Anwendungspotentiale deliberativer Verfahren. Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-11221-9 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-11221-9

Alcántara, S.; Quint, A.; Seebacher, A. (2018): Der Partizipationsmythos “Partizipation in Reallaboren muss repräsentativ sein”. In: Defila, R.; Di Giulio, A. (eds.): Transdisziplinär und transformativ forschen: Eine Methodensammlung. Wiesbaden, 137–141. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-21530-9_7 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-21530-9_7

Baber, W.; Bartlett, R. (2018): Deliberative Democracy and the Environment. In: Bächtiger, A.; Dryzek, J.S.; Mansbridge, J.J.; Warren, M.E. (eds.): The Oxford Handbook of Deliberative Democracy. An introduction. Oxford, 755–767. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198747369.013.59 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198747369.013.59

Bächtiger, A.; Dryzek, J.S.; Mansbridge, J.J.; Warren, M.E. (2018): Deliberative Democracy: An Introduction. In: Bächtiger, A.; Dryzek, J.S.; Mansbridge, J.J.; Warren, M.E. (eds.): The Oxford Handbook of Deliberative Democracy. An introduction. Oxford, 1–34. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198747369.013.50 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198747369.001.0001

Bächtiger, A.; Niemeyer, S.; Neblo, M.; Steenbergen, M.R.; Steiner, J. (2010): Disentangling Diversity in Deliberative Democracy: Competing Theories, Their Blind Spots and Complementarities. In: The Journal of Political Philosophy 18, 1, 32–63. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9760.2009.00342.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9760.2009.00342.x

Beecroft, R.; Trenks, H.; Rhodius, R.; Benighaus, C.; Parodi, O. (2018): Reallabore als Rahmen transformativer und transdisziplinärer Forschung: Ziele und Designprinzipien. In: Defila, R.; Di Giulio, A. (eds.): Transdisziplinär und transformativ forschen. Eine Methodensammlung. Wiesbaden, 75–100. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-21530-9_4 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-21530-9_4

Bergmann, M.; Schäpke, N.; Marg, O.; Stelzer, F.; Lang, D.J.; Bossert, M.; Gantert, M.; Häußler, E.; Marquardt, E.; Piontek, F.M.; Potthast, T.; Rhodius, R.; Rudolph, M.; Ruddat, M.; Seebacher, A.; Sußmann, N. (2021): Transdisciplinary sustainability research in real-world labs: success factors and methods for change. In: Sustainability Science 16, 2, 541–564. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-020-00886-8 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-020-00886-8

Bingham, L.B.; Nabatchi, T.; O’Leary, R. (2005): The New Governance: Practices and Processes for Stakeholder and Citizen Participation in the Work of Government. In: Public Administration Review 65, 5, 547–558. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2005.00482.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2005.00482.x

Böschen, S. (2021): Reallabore: Versammlungen unterschiedlicher Formen des Doing Sustainability verstehen – und gestalten. In: SONA – Netzwerk Soziologie der Nachhaltigkeit (ed.): Soziologie der Nachhaltigkeit. Bielefeld, 285–295. = Soziologie der Nachhaltigkeit 1. https://doi.org/10.14361/9783839451991 DOI: https://doi.org/10.14361/9783839451991-013

Bogner, A. (2012): The Paradox of Participation Experiments. In: Science, Technology and Human Values 37, 5, 506–527. https://doi.org/10.1177/0162243911430398 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0162243911430398

Braun, K.; Könninger, S. (2018): From experiments to ecosystems? Reviewing public participation, scientific governance and the systemic turn. In: Public Understanding of Science 27, 6, 674–689. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662517717375 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662517717375

Brown, V.A.; Harris, J.A.; Russell, J.Y. (eds.) (2010): Tackling wicked problems. Through the transdisciplinary imagination. London. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781849776530

Chambers, S. (2003): Deliberative Democratic Theory. In: Annual Review of Political Science 6, 1, 307–326. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.polisci.6.121901.085538 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.polisci.6.121901.085538

Curato, N.; Sass, J.; Ercan, S.A.; Niemeyer, S. (2020): Deliberative democracy in the age of serial crisis. In: International Political Science Review. https://doi.org/10.1177/0192512120941882 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0192512120941882

Delli Carpini, M.X.; Lomax Cook, F.; Jacobs, L.R. (2004): Public deliberation, discursive participation, and citizen engagement: A review of empirical literature. In: Annual Review of Political Science 7, 315–344. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.polisci.7.121003.091630 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.polisci.7.121003.091630

Dryzek, J.S.; Bächtiger, A.; Chambers, S.; Cohent, J.; Druckman, J.N.; Felicetti, A.; Fishkin, J.S.; Farrell, D.M.; Fung, A.; Gutman, A.; Landemore, H.; Mansbridge, J.; Marien, S.; Neblo, M.A.; Niemeyer, S.; Setälä, M.; Slothuus, R.; Suiter, J.; Thompson, D.; Warren, M.E. (2019): The crisis of democracy and the science of deliberation: Citizens can avoid polarization and make sound decisions. In: Science 363, 6432, 1144–1146. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aaw2694 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aaw2694

Eckart, J.; Ley, A.; Häußler, E.; Erl, T. (2018): Leitfragen für die Gestaltung von Partizipationsprozessen in Reallaboren. In: Defila, R.; Di Giulio, A. (eds.): Transdisziplinär und transformativ forschen: Eine Methodensammlung. Wiesbaden, 105–135. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-21530-9_6 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-21530-9_6

Engels, A.; Walz, K. (2018): Dealing with Multi-Perspectivity in Real-World Laboratories: Experiences from the Transdisciplinary Research Project Urban Transformation Laboratories. In: GAIA – Ecological Perspectives for Science and Society 27, S1, 39–45. https://doi.org/10.14512/gaia.27.S1.10 DOI: https://doi.org/10.14512/gaia.27.S1.10

Frantzeskaki, N.; Kabisch, N. (2016): Designing a knowledge co-production operating space for urban environmental governance – Lessons from Rotterdam, Netherlands and Berlin, Germany. In: Environmental Science and Policy 62, 90–98. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2016.01.010 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2016.01.010

Frantzeskaki, N.; Rok, A. (2018): Co-producing urban sustainability transitions knowledge with community, policy and science. In: Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions 29, 47–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eist.2018.08.001 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eist.2018.08.001

Fung, A. (2006): Varieties of Participation in Complex Governance. In: Public Administration Review 66, 66–75. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2006.00667.x

Fung, A. (2015): Putting the Public Back into Governance: The Challenges of Citizen Participation and Its Future. In: Public Administration Review 75, 4, 513–522. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.12361 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.12361

Funtowicz, S.O.; Ravetz, J.R. (1993): Science for the post-normal age. In: Futures 25, 7, 739–755. https://doi.org/10.1016/0016-3287(93)90022‑L DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0016-3287(93)90022-L

Gibbons, M.; Limoges, C.; Nowotny, H.; Schwartzman, S.; Scott, P.; Trow, M. (1994): The new production of knowledge. The dynamics of science and research in contemporary societies. Los Angeles.

Grießhammer, R.; Brohmann, B. (2015): Wie Transformationen und gesellschaftliche Innovationen gelingen können. Dessau-Roßlau. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5771/9783845267326

Gross, M. (2019): The Paradox of the Unexpected: Normal Surprises and Living with Nonknowledge. In: Environment: Science and Policy for Sustainable Development 61, 3, 20–25. https://doi.org/10.1080/00139157.2019.1589308 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00139157.2019.1589308

Habermas, J. (1973): Wahrheitstheorien. In: Fahrenbach, H. (ed.): Wirklichkeit und Reflexion. Walter Schulz zum 60. Geburtstag. Pfullingen, 211–265.

Habermas, J. (1992): Faktizität und Geltung. Beiträge zur Diskurstheorie des Rechts und des demokratischen Rechtsstaats. Frankfurt am Main.

Han, S.; Schenck-Hamlin, W.; Schenck-Hamlin, D. (2015): Inclusion, Equality, and Discourse Quality in Citizen Deliberations on Broadband. In: Journal of Deliberative Democracy 11, 1, 3, 1–26. https://doi.org/10.16997/jdd.220 DOI: https://doi.org/10.16997/jdd.220

Hölscher, K.; Wittmayer, J.M.; Loorbach, D. (2018): Transition versus transformation: What’s the difference? In: Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions 27, 1–3. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eist.2017.10.007 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eist.2017.10.007

Jahn, T.; Bergmann, M.; Keil, F. (2012): Transdisciplinarity. Between mainstreaming and marginalization. In: Ecological Economics 79, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2012.04.017 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2012.04.017

Karpowitz, C.F.; Raphael, C. (2016): Ideals of Inclusion in Deliberation. In: Journal of Public Deliberation 12, 2, 3, 1–23. https://doi.org/10.16997/jdd.255 DOI: https://doi.org/10.16997/jdd.255

Karpowitz, C.F.; Raphael, C.; Hammond, A.S. (2009): Deliberative democracy and inequality: Two cheers for enclave deliberation among the disempowered. In: Politics and Society 37, 4, 576–615. https://doi.org/10.1177/0032329209349226 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0032329209349226

Kemmis, S.; McTaggart, R. (2005): Participatory action research. In: Denzin, N.K.; Lincoln, Y.S. (eds): The Sage handbook of qualitative research. Thousand Oaks, 559–604.

Kristof, K. (2017): Change Agents in gesellschaftlichen Veränderungsprozessen. In: Reinermann, J.-L.; Behr, F. (eds.): Die Experimentalstadt. Kreativität und die kulturelle Dimension der Nachhaltigen Entwicklung. Wiesbaden, 165–179. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-14981-9_9 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-14981-9_9

Lazarova, K.; Helfenstein, B.S.; Dietz, R.; Alcántara, S. (eds.) (2018): Parklets für Stuttgart: Ein Realexperiment. Stuttgart.

Löw, M. (2016): The sociology of space. Materiality, social structures, and action. New York. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-349-69568-3

Lund, D.H. (2018): Co-Creation in Urban Governance: From Inclusion to Innovation. In: Scandinavian Journal of Public Administration 22, 2, 3–17.

Manin, B. (1987): On Legitimacy and Political Deliberation. In: Political Theory 15, 3, 338–368. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0090591787015003005

Mansbridge, J.; Bohman, J.; Chambers, S.; Christiano, T.; Fung, A.; Parkinson, J.; Thompson, D.F.; Warren, M.E. (2012): A systemic approach to deliberative democracy. In: Parkinson, J.; Mansbridge, J. (eds.): Deliberative systems. Deliberative democracy at the large scale. Cambridge, 1–26. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139178914.002

Mauser, W.; Klepper, G.; Rice, M.; Schmalzbauer, B.S.; Hackmann, H.; Leemans, R.; Moore, H. (2013): Transdisciplinary global change research. The co-creation of knowledge for sustainability. In: Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability 5, 3‑4, 420–431. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2013.07.001 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2013.07.001

McCrory, G.; Schäpke, N.; Holmén, J.; Holmberg, J. (2020): Sustainability-oriented labs in real-world contexts: An exploratory review. In: Journal of Cleaner Production 277, 3–4, 123202. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.123202 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.123202

Meyer-Soylu, S.; Parodi, O.; Trenks, H.; Seebacher, A. (2016): Das Reallabor als Partizipationskontinuum. In: TATuP – Zeitschrift für Technikfolgenabschätzung in Theorie und Praxis 25, 3, 31–40. https://doi.org/10.14512/tatup.25.3.31 DOI: https://doi.org/10.14512/tatup.25.3.31

Niemeyer, S. (2013): Democracy and Climate Change: What can Deliberative Democracy Contribute? In: Australian Journal of Politics and History 59, 3, 429–448. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajph.12025 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/ajph.12025

Parodi, O.; Beecroft, R.; Albiez, M.; Quint, A.; Seebacher, A.; Tamm, K.; Waitz, C. (2017): The ABC of Real-world Lab Methodology. From “Action Research” to “Participation” and Beyond. In: Trialog 126/127, 3‑4, 74–82.

Pohl, C.; Truffer, B.; Hirsch Hadorn, G. (2017): Addressing Wicked Problems through Transdisciplinary Research. In: Frodeman, R.; Thompson Klein, J.; dos Santos Pacheco, R.C. (eds.): The Oxford Handbook of Interdisciplinarity. Oxford, 319–331. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198733522.013.26

Pow, J.; van Dijk, L.; Marien, S. (2020): It’s Not Just the Taking Part that Counts: ‘Like Me’ Perceptions Connect the Wider Public to Minipublics. In: Journal of Deliberative Democracy 16, 2, 43–55. https://doi.org/10.16997/jdd.368 DOI: https://doi.org/10.16997/jdd.368

Puerari, E.; de Koning, J.; von Wirth, T.; Karré, P.; Mulder, I.; Loorbach, D. (2018): Co-Creation Dynamics in Urban Living Labs. In: Sustainability 10, 6, 1893. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10061893 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su10061893

Reallabor für nachhaltige Mobilitätskultur/Universität Stuttgart (eds.) (2018): Stuttgart in Bewegung. Berichte von unterwegs. Berlin.

Renn, O. (2008): Risk Governance: Coping with Uncertainty in a Complex World. London.

Renn, O.; Klinke, A. (2013): A Framework of Adaptive Risk Governance for Urban Planning. In: Sustainability 5, 5, 2036–2059. https://doi.org/10.3390/su5052036 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su5052036

Rittel, H.W.; Webber, M.M. (1973): Dilemmas in a General Theory of Planning. In: Policy Sciences 4, 2, 155–169. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01405730 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01405730

Rowe, G.; Frewer, L.J. (2000): Public Participation Methods: A Framework for Evaluation. In: Science, Technology and Human Values 25, 1, 3–29. https://doi.org/10.1177/016224390002500101 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/016224390002500101

Sanders, E. B.-N.; Stappers, P.J. (2008): Co-creation and the new landscapes of design. In: CoDesign 4, 1, 5–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/15710880701875068 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/15710880701875068

Schäpke, N.; Bergmann, M.; Stelzer, F.; Lang, D.J. (2018): Labs in the Real World: Advancing Transdisciplinary Research and Sustainability Transformation: Mapping the Field and Emerging Lines of Inquiry. In: GAIA – Ecological Perspectives for Science and Society 27, S1, 8–11. https://doi.org/10.14512/gaia.27.S1.4 DOI: https://doi.org/10.14512/gaia.27.S1.4

Schäpke, N.; Stelzer, F.; Caniglia, G.; Bergmann, M.; Wanner, M.; Singer-Brodowski, M.; Loorbach, D.; Olsson, P.; Baedeker, C.; Lang, D.J. (2018): Jointly Experimenting for Transformation? Shaping Real-World Laboratories by Comparing Them. In: GAIA – Ecological Perspectives for Science and Society 27, S1, 85–96. https://doi.org/10.14512/gaia.27.S1.16 DOI: https://doi.org/10.14512/gaia.27.S1.16

Schneidewind, U.; Singer-Brodowski, M. (2013): Transformative Wissenschaft. Klimawandel im deutschen Wissenschafts- und Hochschulsystem. Marburg.

Schneidewind, U.; Augenstein, K.; Stelzer, F.; Wanner, M. (2018): Structure Matters: Real-World Laboratories as a New Type of Large-Scale Research Infrastructure: A Framework Inspired by Giddens’ Structuration Theory. In: GAIA – Ecological Perspectives for Science and Society 27, S1, 12–17. https://doi.org/10.14512/gaia.27.S1.5 DOI: https://doi.org/10.14512/gaia.27.S1.5

Steenbergen, M.R.; Bächtiger, A.; Spörndli, M.; Steiner, J. (2003): Measuring Political Deliberation: A Discourse Quality Index. In: Comparative European Politics 1, 1, 21–48. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.cep.6110002 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.cep.6110002

Torfing, J.; Sørensen, E.; Røiseland, A. (2019): Transforming the Public Sector Into an Arena for Co-Creation: Barriers, Drivers, Benefits, and Ways Forward. In: Administration and Society 51, 5, 795–825. https://doi.org/10.1177/0095399716680057 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0095399716680057

Turnhout, E.; Metze, T.; Wyborn, C.; Klenk, N.; Louder, E. (2020): The politics of co-production: participation, power, and transformation. In: Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability 42, 15–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2019.11.009 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2019.11.009

Tyler, T.R. (2000): Social Justice: Outcome and Procedure. In: International Journal of Psychology 35, 2, 117–125. https://doi.org/10.1080/002075900399411 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/002075900399411

Tyler, T.R. (2006): Psychological perspectives on legitimacy and legitimation. In: Annual Review of Psychology 57, 375–400. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.57.102904.190038 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.57.102904.190038

Vetter, A.; Remer-Bollow, U. (2017): Bürger und Beteiligung in der Demokratie. Eine Einführung. Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-13722-9 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-13722-9

von Wirth, T.; Levin-Keitel, M. (2020): Lokale Nachhaltigkeitsexperimente als raumwirksame Interventionen: Theoretische Grundlagen und Handlungskonzepte. In: GAIA – Ecological Perspectives for Science and Society 29, 2, 98–105. https://doi.org/10.14512/gaia.29.2.7 DOI: https://doi.org/10.14512/gaia.29.2.7

Voorberg, W.H.; Bekkers, V.J.J.M.; Tummers, L.G. (2015): A Systematic Review of Co-Creation and Co-Production: Embarking on the social innovation journey. In: Public Management Review 17, 9, 1333–1357. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2014.930505 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2014.930505

Wagner, F.; Miller, E. (2018): The Background and History of Real-World Laboratory Funding in Baden-Württemberg. In: GAIA – Ecological Perspectives for Science and Society 27, S1, 5. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14512/gaia.27.S1.2

WBGU – Wissenschaftlicher Beirat der Bundesregierung Globale Umweltveränderungen (2016): Humanity on the move: Unlocking the transformative power of cities. Berlin.

Weber, M. (2019 [1921]): Economy and Society. A New Translation. Cambridge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4159/9780674240827

Downloads

Veröffentlicht

Print-Veröffentlichung am 2021-08-31 (Version 2)
Online first am 2021-07-16 (Version 1)

Versionen

Ausgabe

Bd. 79 Nr. 4 (2021)

Rubrik

Politik- und Praxis-Perspektive

Lizenz

Copyright (c) 2021 Doris Lindner, Marco Sonnberger

Creative Commons License

Dieses Werk steht unter der Lizenz Creative Commons Namensnennung 4.0 International.

Artikel in Raumforschung und Raumordnung - Spatial Research and Planing werden unter einer Creative Commons Lizenz  veröffentlicht. Seit Jahrgang 79, Ausgabe 2, erfolgt die Veröffentlichung im Lizenzmodell  CC BY 4.0 (Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License). Von Jahrgang 77 Ausgabe 1 bis Jahrgang 79 Ausgabe 1 wurden alle Artikel unter einer CC BY-SA-Lizenz veröffentlicht. Frühere Jahrgänge wurden von oekom 2022 unter the Lizenz CC BY 4.0 wiederveröffentlicht.

Zitierweise

1.
Sonnberger M, Lindner D. Partizipation in Reallaboren in neuem Licht?! Ein Ansatz, die Lücke zwischen ko-kreativer und deliberativer Partizipation zu schließen. RuR [Internet]. 31. August 2021 [zitiert 15. August 2026];79(4):424-37. Verfügbar unter: https://rur.oekom.de/index.php/rur/article/view/27

Teilen