Participation in real-world laboratories in a new light?! Closing the gap between co-creative and deliberative participation

Authors

  • Marco Sonnberger Universtität Stuttgart
  • Doris Lindner Universtität Stuttgart

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.14512/rur.27

Keywords:

Real-world laboratory, Co-creation, Participation, Deliberation, Real-world experiments, Sustainability

Abstract

Sustainability-oriented real-world laboratories involve the co-design and co-creation of knowledge, based on a transdisciplinary cooperation between actors from different social worlds – academia, the administration, business, civil society – each endowed with specific interests, resources and worldviews. Sustainability-oriented real-world laboratories claim to be a means of inclusive participation in the co-creative shaping of solutions for socioecological issues and exploring pathways to sustainability. In the literature dealing with sustainability-oriented real-world laboratories, participation is thus mainly understood as active involvement by civil society, change agents and citizens in processes of experimentation and the implementation of solutions. We call this co-creative participation. However, participation in talk-based opinion formation and decision-making processes – we call this deliberative participation – is hardly discussed in the respective literature. In this paper, we argue that co-creative and deliberative participation are two forms of participation which can be conceptualized differently but which are both relevant for successful experimentation in sustainability-oriented real-world laboratories and are mainly intertwined in practice. We propose an ideal-typical conceptual framework for participation in sustainability-oriented real-world laboratories that combines co-creative and deliberative participation. The aim is to contribute to a systematization of, and rationale for, different forms of participation in real-world laboratories.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Alcántara, S.; Bach, N.; Kuhn, R.; Ullrich, P. (2016): Demokratietheorie und Partizipationspraxis. Analyse und Anwendungspotentiale deliberativer Verfahren. Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-11221-9

Alcántara, S.; Quint, A.; Seebacher, A. (2018): Der Partizipationsmythos “Partizipation in Reallaboren muss repräsentativ sein”. In: Defila, R.; Di Giulio, A. (eds.): Transdisziplinär und transformativ forschen: Eine Methodensammlung. Wiesbaden, 137–141. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-21530-9_7

Baber, W.; Bartlett, R. (2018): Deliberative Democracy and the Environment. In: Bächtiger, A.; Dryzek, J.S.; Mansbridge, J.J.; Warren, M.E. (eds.): The Oxford Handbook of Deliberative Democracy. An introduction. Oxford, 755–767. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198747369.013.59

Bächtiger, A.; Dryzek, J.S.; Mansbridge, J.J.; Warren, M.E. (2018): Deliberative Democracy: An Introduction. In: Bächtiger, A.; Dryzek, J.S.; Mansbridge, J.J.; Warren, M.E. (eds.): The Oxford Handbook of Deliberative Democracy. An introduction. Oxford, 1–34. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198747369.013.50

Bächtiger, A.; Niemeyer, S.; Neblo, M.; Steenbergen, M.R.; Steiner, J. (2010): Disentangling Diversity in Deliberative Democracy: Competing Theories, Their Blind Spots and Complementarities. In: The Journal of Political Philosophy 18, 1, 32–63. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9760.2009.00342.x

Beecroft, R.; Trenks, H.; Rhodius, R.; Benighaus, C.; Parodi, O. (2018): Reallabore als Rahmen transformativer und transdisziplinärer Forschung: Ziele und Designprinzipien. In: Defila, R.; Di Giulio, A. (eds.): Transdisziplinär und transformativ forschen. Eine Methodensammlung. Wiesbaden, 75–100. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-21530-9_4

Bergmann, M.; Schäpke, N.; Marg, O.; Stelzer, F.; Lang, D.J.; Bossert, M.; Gantert, M.; Häußler, E.; Marquardt, E.; Piontek, F.M.; Potthast, T.; Rhodius, R.; Rudolph, M.; Ruddat, M.; Seebacher, A.; Sußmann, N. (2021): Transdisciplinary sustainability research in real-world labs: success factors and methods for change. In: Sustainability Science 16, 2, 541–564. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-020-00886-8

Bingham, L.B.; Nabatchi, T.; O’Leary, R. (2005): The New Governance: Practices and Processes for Stakeholder and Citizen Participation in the Work of Government. In: Public Administration Review 65, 5, 547–558. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2005.00482.x

Böschen, S. (2021): Reallabore: Versammlungen unterschiedlicher Formen des Doing Sustainability verstehen – und gestalten. In: SONA – Netzwerk Soziologie der Nachhaltigkeit (ed.): Soziologie der Nachhaltigkeit. Bielefeld, 285–295. = Soziologie der Nachhaltigkeit 1. https://doi.org/10.14361/9783839451991

Bogner, A. (2012): The Paradox of Participation Experiments. In: Science, Technology and Human Values 37, 5, 506–527. https://doi.org/10.1177/0162243911430398

Braun, K.; Könninger, S. (2018): From experiments to ecosystems? Reviewing public participation, scientific governance and the systemic turn. In: Public Understanding of Science 27, 6, 674–689. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662517717375

Brown, V.A.; Harris, J.A.; Russell, J.Y. (eds.) (2010): Tackling wicked problems. Through the transdisciplinary imagination. London.

Chambers, S. (2003): Deliberative Democratic Theory. In: Annual Review of Political Science 6, 1, 307–326. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.polisci.6.121901.085538

Curato, N.; Sass, J.; Ercan, S.A.; Niemeyer, S. (2020): Deliberative democracy in the age of serial crisis. In: International Political Science Review. https://doi.org/10.1177/0192512120941882

Delli Carpini, M.X.; Lomax Cook, F.; Jacobs, L.R. (2004): Public deliberation, discursive participation, and citizen engagement: A review of empirical literature. In: Annual Review of Political Science 7, 315–344. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.polisci.7.121003.091630

Dryzek, J.S.; Bächtiger, A.; Chambers, S.; Cohent, J.; Druckman, J.N.; Felicetti, A.; Fishkin, J.S.; Farrell, D.M.; Fung, A.; Gutman, A.; Landemore, H.; Mansbridge, J.; Marien, S.; Neblo, M.A.; Niemeyer, S.; Setälä, M.; Slothuus, R.; Suiter, J.; Thompson, D.; Warren, M.E. (2019): The crisis of democracy and the science of deliberation: Citizens can avoid polarization and make sound decisions. In: Science 363, 6432, 1144–1146. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aaw2694

Eckart, J.; Ley, A.; Häußler, E.; Erl, T. (2018): Leitfragen für die Gestaltung von Partizipationsprozessen in Reallaboren. In: Defila, R.; Di Giulio, A. (eds.): Transdisziplinär und transformativ forschen: Eine Methodensammlung. Wiesbaden, 105–135. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-21530-9_6

Engels, A.; Walz, K. (2018): Dealing with Multi-Perspectivity in Real-World Laboratories: Experiences from the Transdisciplinary Research Project Urban Transformation Laboratories. In: GAIA – Ecological Perspectives for Science and Society 27, S1, 39–45. https://doi.org/10.14512/gaia.27.S1.10

Frantzeskaki, N.; Kabisch, N. (2016): Designing a knowledge co-production operating space for urban environmental governance – Lessons from Rotterdam, Netherlands and Berlin, Germany. In: Environmental Science and Policy 62, 90–98. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2016.01.010

Frantzeskaki, N.; Rok, A. (2018): Co-producing urban sustainability transitions knowledge with community, policy and science. In: Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions 29, 47–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eist.2018.08.001

Fung, A. (2006): Varieties of Participation in Complex Governance. In: Public Administration Review 66, 66–75.

Fung, A. (2015): Putting the Public Back into Governance: The Challenges of Citizen Participation and Its Future. In: Public Administration Review 75, 4, 513–522. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.12361

Funtowicz, S.O.; Ravetz, J.R. (1993): Science for the post-normal age. In: Futures 25, 7, 739–755. https://doi.org/10.1016/0016-3287(93)90022‑L

Gibbons, M.; Limoges, C.; Nowotny, H.; Schwartzman, S.; Scott, P.; Trow, M. (1994): The new production of knowledge. The dynamics of science and research in contemporary societies. Los Angeles.

Grießhammer, R.; Brohmann, B. (2015): Wie Transformationen und gesellschaftliche Innovationen gelingen können. Dessau-Roßlau.

Gross, M. (2019): The Paradox of the Unexpected: Normal Surprises and Living with Nonknowledge. In: Environment: Science and Policy for Sustainable Development 61, 3, 20–25. https://doi.org/10.1080/00139157.2019.1589308

Habermas, J. (1973): Wahrheitstheorien. In: Fahrenbach, H. (ed.): Wirklichkeit und Reflexion. Walter Schulz zum 60. Geburtstag. Pfullingen, 211–265.

Habermas, J. (1992): Faktizität und Geltung. Beiträge zur Diskurstheorie des Rechts und des demokratischen Rechtsstaats. Frankfurt am Main.

Han, S.; Schenck-Hamlin, W.; Schenck-Hamlin, D. (2015): Inclusion, Equality, and Discourse Quality in Citizen Deliberations on Broadband. In: Journal of Deliberative Democracy 11, 1, 3, 1–26. https://doi.org/10.16997/jdd.220

Hölscher, K.; Wittmayer, J.M.; Loorbach, D. (2018): Transition versus transformation: What’s the difference? In: Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions 27, 1–3. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eist.2017.10.007

Jahn, T.; Bergmann, M.; Keil, F. (2012): Transdisciplinarity. Between mainstreaming and marginalization. In: Ecological Economics 79, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2012.04.017

Karpowitz, C.F.; Raphael, C. (2016): Ideals of Inclusion in Deliberation. In: Journal of Public Deliberation 12, 2, 3, 1–23. https://doi.org/10.16997/jdd.255

Karpowitz, C.F.; Raphael, C.; Hammond, A.S. (2009): Deliberative democracy and inequality: Two cheers for enclave deliberation among the disempowered. In: Politics and Society 37, 4, 576–615. https://doi.org/10.1177/0032329209349226

Kemmis, S.; McTaggart, R. (2005): Participatory action research. In: Denzin, N.K.; Lincoln, Y.S. (eds): The Sage handbook of qualitative research. Thousand Oaks, 559–604.

Kristof, K. (2017): Change Agents in gesellschaftlichen Veränderungsprozessen. In: Reinermann, J.-L.; Behr, F. (eds.): Die Experimentalstadt. Kreativität und die kulturelle Dimension der Nachhaltigen Entwicklung. Wiesbaden, 165–179. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-14981-9_9

Lazarova, K.; Helfenstein, B.S.; Dietz, R.; Alcántara, S. (eds.) (2018): Parklets für Stuttgart: Ein Realexperiment. Stuttgart.

Löw, M. (2016): The sociology of space. Materiality, social structures, and action. New York.

Lund, D.H. (2018): Co-Creation in Urban Governance: From Inclusion to Innovation. In: Scandinavian Journal of Public Administration 22, 2, 3–17.

Manin, B. (1987): On Legitimacy and Political Deliberation. In: Political Theory 15, 3, 338–368.

Mansbridge, J.; Bohman, J.; Chambers, S.; Christiano, T.; Fung, A.; Parkinson, J.; Thompson, D.F.; Warren, M.E. (2012): A systemic approach to deliberative democracy. In: Parkinson, J.; Mansbridge, J. (eds.): Deliberative systems. Deliberative democracy at the large scale. Cambridge, 1–26.

Mauser, W.; Klepper, G.; Rice, M.; Schmalzbauer, B.S.; Hackmann, H.; Leemans, R.; Moore, H. (2013): Transdisciplinary global change research. The co-creation of knowledge for sustainability. In: Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability 5, 3‑4, 420–431. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2013.07.001

McCrory, G.; Schäpke, N.; Holmén, J.; Holmberg, J. (2020): Sustainability-oriented labs in real-world contexts: An exploratory review. In: Journal of Cleaner Production 277, 3–4, 123202. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.123202

Meyer-Soylu, S.; Parodi, O.; Trenks, H.; Seebacher, A. (2016): Das Reallabor als Partizipationskontinuum. In: TATuP – Zeitschrift für Technikfolgenabschätzung in Theorie und Praxis 25, 3, 31–40. https://doi.org/10.14512/tatup.25.3.31

Niemeyer, S. (2013): Democracy and Climate Change: What can Deliberative Democracy Contribute? In: Australian Journal of Politics and History 59, 3, 429–448. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajph.12025

Parodi, O.; Beecroft, R.; Albiez, M.; Quint, A.; Seebacher, A.; Tamm, K.; Waitz, C. (2017): The ABC of Real-world Lab Methodology. From “Action Research” to “Participation” and Beyond. In: Trialog 126/127, 3‑4, 74–82.

Pohl, C.; Truffer, B.; Hirsch Hadorn, G. (2017): Addressing Wicked Problems through Transdisciplinary Research. In: Frodeman, R.; Thompson Klein, J.; dos Santos Pacheco, R.C. (eds.): The Oxford Handbook of Interdisciplinarity. Oxford, 319–331.

Pow, J.; van Dijk, L.; Marien, S. (2020): It’s Not Just the Taking Part that Counts: ‘Like Me’ Perceptions Connect the Wider Public to Minipublics. In: Journal of Deliberative Democracy 16, 2, 43–55. https://doi.org/10.16997/jdd.368

Puerari, E.; de Koning, J.; von Wirth, T.; Karré, P.; Mulder, I.; Loorbach, D. (2018): Co-Creation Dynamics in Urban Living Labs. In: Sustainability 10, 6, 1893. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10061893

Reallabor für nachhaltige Mobilitätskultur/Universität Stuttgart (eds.) (2018): Stuttgart in Bewegung. Berichte von unterwegs. Berlin.

Renn, O. (2008): Risk Governance: Coping with Uncertainty in a Complex World. London.

Renn, O.; Klinke, A. (2013): A Framework of Adaptive Risk Governance for Urban Planning. In: Sustainability 5, 5, 2036–2059. https://doi.org/10.3390/su5052036

Rittel, H.W.; Webber, M.M. (1973): Dilemmas in a General Theory of Planning. In: Policy Sciences 4, 2, 155–169. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01405730

Rowe, G.; Frewer, L.J. (2000): Public Participation Methods: A Framework for Evaluation. In: Science, Technology and Human Values 25, 1, 3–29. https://doi.org/10.1177/016224390002500101

Sanders, E. B.-N.; Stappers, P.J. (2008): Co-creation and the new landscapes of design. In: CoDesign 4, 1, 5–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/15710880701875068

Schäpke, N.; Bergmann, M.; Stelzer, F.; Lang, D.J. (2018): Labs in the Real World: Advancing Transdisciplinary Research and Sustainability Transformation: Mapping the Field and Emerging Lines of Inquiry. In: GAIA – Ecological Perspectives for Science and Society 27, S1, 8–11. https://doi.org/10.14512/gaia.27.S1.4

Schäpke, N.; Stelzer, F.; Caniglia, G.; Bergmann, M.; Wanner, M.; Singer-Brodowski, M.; Loorbach, D.; Olsson, P.; Baedeker, C.; Lang, D.J. (2018): Jointly Experimenting for Transformation? Shaping Real-World Laboratories by Comparing Them. In: GAIA – Ecological Perspectives for Science and Society 27, S1, 85–96. https://doi.org/10.14512/gaia.27.S1.16

Schneidewind, U.; Singer-Brodowski, M. (2013): Transformative Wissenschaft. Klimawandel im deutschen Wissenschafts- und Hochschulsystem. Marburg.

Schneidewind, U.; Augenstein, K.; Stelzer, F.; Wanner, M. (2018): Structure Matters: Real-World Laboratories as a New Type of Large-Scale Research Infrastructure: A Framework Inspired by Giddens’ Structuration Theory. In: GAIA – Ecological Perspectives for Science and Society 27, S1, 12–17. https://doi.org/10.14512/gaia.27.S1.5

Steenbergen, M.R.; Bächtiger, A.; Spörndli, M.; Steiner, J. (2003): Measuring Political Deliberation: A Discourse Quality Index. In: Comparative European Politics 1, 1, 21–48. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.cep.6110002

Torfing, J.; Sørensen, E.; Røiseland, A. (2019): Transforming the Public Sector Into an Arena for Co-Creation: Barriers, Drivers, Benefits, and Ways Forward. In: Administration and Society 51, 5, 795–825. https://doi.org/10.1177/0095399716680057

Turnhout, E.; Metze, T.; Wyborn, C.; Klenk, N.; Louder, E. (2020): The politics of co-production: participation, power, and transformation. In: Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability 42, 15–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2019.11.009

Tyler, T.R. (2000): Social Justice: Outcome and Procedure. In: International Journal of Psychology 35, 2, 117–125. https://doi.org/10.1080/002075900399411

Tyler, T.R. (2006): Psychological perspectives on legitimacy and legitimation. In: Annual Review of Psychology 57, 375–400. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.57.102904.190038

Vetter, A.; Remer-Bollow, U. (2017): Bürger und Beteiligung in der Demokratie. Eine Einführung. Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-13722-9

von Wirth, T.; Levin-Keitel, M. (2020): Lokale Nachhaltigkeitsexperimente als raumwirksame Interventionen: Theoretische Grundlagen und Handlungskonzepte. In: GAIA – Ecological Perspectives for Science and Society 29, 2, 98–105. https://doi.org/10.14512/gaia.29.2.7

Voorberg, W.H.; Bekkers, V.J.J.M.; Tummers, L.G. (2015): A Systematic Review of Co-Creation and Co-Production: Embarking on the social innovation journey. In: Public Management Review 17, 9, 1333–1357. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2014.930505

Wagner, F.; Miller, E. (2018): The Background and History of Real-World Laboratory Funding in Baden-Württemberg. In: GAIA – Ecological Perspectives for Science and Society 27, S1, 5.

WBGU – Wissenschaftlicher Beirat der Bundesregierung Globale Umweltveränderungen (2016): Humanity on the move: Unlocking the transformative power of cities. Berlin.

Weber, M. (2019 [1921]): Economy and Society. A New Translation. Cambridge.

Published

Issue publication date 2021-08-31 (version 2)
Published online first 2021-07-16 (version 1)

Versions

How to Cite

Sonnberger, M. and Lindner, D. (2021) “Participation in real-world laboratories in a new light?! Closing the gap between co-creative and deliberative participation”, Raumforschung und Raumordnung | Spatial Research and Planning. DE, 79(4), pp. 424-437. doi: 10.14512/rur.27.

Issue

Section

Policy and practice perspective