Raumplanerausbildung in Europa — Situation und Perspektiven

Autor/innen

  • Peter Ache Teknillien korkeakoulu Yhdyskuntasuunnittelun tutkimus- ja koulutuskeskus, Luolamiehentie 7, 02150, TKK Helsinki

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03183151

Schlagwörter:

Bologna Process, planning education, degree standards, spatial planning, urban and regional

Abstract

This paper examines the education of spatial planners in Europe. The comparison is based on studies about the current state of implementation of the Bologna Process, which has been originally undertaken and recently updated by the Association of European Schools of Planning (AESOP). The training of planners, i.e. the quality of planning education and its applied standards, is a key point of discussion among schools of planning. Ultimately, the definition of standards depends on the feedback from professional circles (in particular regarding the situation on the labour market), and on co-operation with planning organisations. Accordingly, AESOP currently is in discussion with the European Council of Spatial Planners (ECTP) on the extent to which standards should be defined in terms of the new system of university degrees (bachelor’s and master’s degrees) to guarantee a common European labour market and avoid any restrictions on access.

Downloads

Download-Daten sind nocht nicht verfügbar.

Literaturhinweise

RTPI Indicative Learning Outcomes. RTPI 2004.

AESOP Working Group on the Curriculum of Planning Education (1995): European Planning Education. AESOP Statement. NN, AESOP.

Ache, P.; Jarenko, K. (Forthcoming): State of the Bologna-Process — Up-date. Helsinki, AESOP.

Davoudi, S.; Ellison, P. (2006): Implications of the Bologna Process for Planning Education in Europe, AESOP.

Department for Education and Skills (2007): Bologna Process Stocktaking London 2007. London.

European Commission (1999): ESDP — European Spatial Development Perspective. Towards Balanced and Sustainable Development of the Territory of the European Union. Agreed at the Informal Council of Ministers responsible for Spatial Planning in Potsdam, May 1999.

European Commission (1997): The EU compendium of spatial planning systems and policies. Luxembourg, Office for Official Publications of the EC.

Fubini, A. (Ed.) (2004): Improving Planning Education in Europe. Milan, Franco Angeli.

Geppert, A.; Verhage, R. (2008): Towards a European recognition for the Planning profession. Planning Education, AESOP.

University of Valencia et al. (2006): ESPON project 2.3.2 — Governance of territorial and urban policies from EU to local level. Draft Final Report. Valencia.

Wertheimer, J.; Zima, P.V. (Eds.) (2001): Strategien der Verdummung: Infantilisierung in der Fun-Gesellschaft. München, Beck.

Downloads

Veröffentlicht

2008-11-30

Ausgabe

Bd. 66 Nr. 6 (2008)

Rubrik

Forschungsbeitrag

Lizenz

Copyright (c) 2008 RuR Editors

Creative Commons License

This work is re-published by oekom 2022 under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Artikel in Raumforschung und Raumordnung - Spatial Research and Planing werden unter einer Creative Commons Lizenz  veröffentlicht. Seit Jahrgang 79, Ausgabe 2, erfolgt die Veröffentlichung im Lizenzmodell  CC BY 4.0 (Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License). Von Jahrgang 77 Ausgabe 1 bis Jahrgang 79 Ausgabe 1 wurden alle Artikel unter einer CC BY-SA-Lizenz veröffentlicht. Frühere Jahrgänge wurden von oekom 2022 unter the Lizenz CC BY 4.0 wiederveröffentlicht.

Zitierweise

1.
Ache P. Raumplanerausbildung in Europa — Situation und Perspektiven. RuR [Internet]. 30. November 2008 [zitiert 15. August 2026];66(6):508–518. Verfügbar unter: https://rur.oekom.de/index.php/rur/article/view/1221

Teilen

Am häufigsten gelesenen Artikel dieser/dieses Autor/in