Planning education in Europe — situation and perspectives Authors Peter Ache Teknillien korkeakoulu Yhdyskuntasuunnittelun tutkimus- ja koulutuskeskus, Luolamiehentie 7, 02150, TKK Helsinki DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03183151 Keywords: Bologna Process, planning education, degree standards, spatial planning, urban and regional Abstract This paper examines the education of spatial planners in Europe. The comparison is based on studies about the current state of implementation of the Bologna Process, which has been originally undertaken and recently updated by the Association of European Schools of Planning (AESOP). The training of planners, i.e. the quality of planning education and its applied standards, is a key point of discussion among schools of planning. Ultimately, the definition of standards depends on the feedback from professional circles (in particular regarding the situation on the labour market), and on co-operation with planning organisations. Accordingly, AESOP currently is in discussion with the European Council of Spatial Planners (ECTP) on the extent to which standards should be defined in terms of the new system of university degrees (bachelor’s and master’s degrees) to guarantee a common European labour market and avoid any restrictions on access. Downloads Download data is not yet available. References RTPI Indicative Learning Outcomes. RTPI 2004. AESOP Working Group on the Curriculum of Planning Education (1995): European Planning Education. AESOP Statement. NN, AESOP. Ache, P.; Jarenko, K. (Forthcoming): State of the Bologna-Process — Up-date. Helsinki, AESOP. Davoudi, S.; Ellison, P. (2006): Implications of the Bologna Process for Planning Education in Europe, AESOP. Department for Education and Skills (2007): Bologna Process Stocktaking London 2007. London. European Commission (1999): ESDP — European Spatial Development Perspective. Towards Balanced and Sustainable Development of the Territory of the European Union. Agreed at the Informal Council of Ministers responsible for Spatial Planning in Potsdam, May 1999. European Commission (1997): The EU compendium of spatial planning systems and policies. Luxembourg, Office for Official Publications of the EC. Fubini, A. (Ed.) (2004): Improving Planning Education in Europe. Milan, Franco Angeli. Geppert, A.; Verhage, R. (2008): Towards a European recognition for the Planning profession. Planning Education, AESOP. University of Valencia et al. (2006): ESPON project 2.3.2 — Governance of territorial and urban policies from EU to local level. Draft Final Report. Valencia. Wertheimer, J.; Zima, P.V. (Eds.) (2001): Strategien der Verdummung: Infantilisierung in der Fun-Gesellschaft. München, Beck. Downloads PDF (German) Published 2008-11-30 Issue Vol. 66 No. 6 (2008) Section Research Article License Copyright (c) 2008 RuR Editors This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported License. Articles in Raumforschung und Raumordnung – Spatial Research and Planning are published under a Creative Commons license. From Vol. 79 No. 2 (2021), the license applied is CC BY 4.0. From Vol. 77 No. 1 to Vol. 79 No.1, articles were published under a CC BY-SA license. Earlier volumes have been re-published by oekom 2022 under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License CC BY 4.0. How to Cite 1.Ache P. Planning education in Europe — situation and perspectives. RuR [Internet]. 2008 Nov. 30 [cited 2024 Apr. 26];66(6):508–518. Available from: https://rur.oekom.de/index.php/rur/article/view/1221 More Citation Formats ACM ACS APA ABNT Chicago Harvard IEEE MLA Turabian Vancouver Download Citation Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS) BibTeX
Acknowledgement to our reviewers 2023 February 29, 2024 The editors would like to thank all reviewers who have been reviewing articles in 2023.
A new Issue has been published February 29, 2024 A new issue of the Open-Access-Journal "Raumforschung und Raumordnung | Spatial Research and Planning" has been published. Volume 82 No. 1 (2024) is now available on our website.