Regionale Verteilung öffentlicher Mittel für Universitäten: Zum Einfluss unterschiedlicher Verfahren der Hochschulfinanzierung auf die regionale Ressourcenverteilung — Die Beispiele Niederlande, Großbritannien und Texas

Ingo  Liefner

doi:10.1007/BF03183044

Authors

Ingo Liefner Geographisches Institut Abt. Wirtschaftsgeographie, Universität Hannover, Schneiderberg 50, 30167, Hannover

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03183044

Keywords:

Article

Abstract

Public funding of institutions of higher education affects regions as the spending of universities creates demand and fosters regional development. This article analyzes the nonintended regional effects of public funding of universities. Examples are the Netherlands, Britain and the US. These countries are currently viewed as being role models for reforms in the German higher education system. It can be shown that specialization of universities and competition for public resources leads to regional concentration of resources. The use of stabilizing factors in the funding process can limit regional redistribution.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Acs, Z.J.; Audretsch, D.B.; Feldman, M.P. (1992): Real Effects of Academic Research: Comment. In: The American Economic Review, March 1992, S. 363–367

Andersson, Å.E. (1995): Creation, Innovation and Diffusion of Knowledge: General and Specific Economic Impacts. In: Bertuglia, C.S.; Fischer, M.M.; Preto, G. (Eds.): Technological Change, Economic Development and Space, Berlin, S. 13–33

Beise, M.; Stahl, H. (1999): Public Research and Industrial Innovations in Germany. In: Research Policy, Vol. 281, S. 397–422

Castells, M.; Hall, P. (1994): Technopoles of the World. The making of 21st Century Industrial Complexes. London

Clark, B.R. (1983): The Higher Education System. Academic Organization in Cross-National Perspective. Berkeley

ders. Clark, B.R. (1998): Creating Entrepreneurial Universities: Organizational Pathways of Transformation. Pergamon

De Gaudemar, J.-P. (1997): The Higher Education Institution as a Regional Actor. in: Higher Education Management, Vol. 9, Nr. 2, S. 53–64

Dill, D.D. (1997): Higher education markets and public policy. In: Higher Education Policy, Vol. 10, Nr. 3/4, S. 167–185

Echeverri-Carroll, E.L. (1997): Japanese Style Networks and Innovations in High-Technology Firms in Texas. Austin

Giese, E. (1987): Regionalwirtschaftliche Bedeutung von Hochschulen in der Bundesrepublik Deutschland. In: Giese, E. (Hrsg.) (1987): Aktuelle Beiträge zur Hochschulforschung. = Giessener Geographische Schriften, Bd. 62, S. 25–50

Gladieux, L.E.; Hauptman, A.M.; Knapp, L.G. (1997): The Federal Government and Higher Education. In: Goodchild, L.F.; Lovell, C.D.; Hines, E.R.; Gill, J.I. (Eds.) (1997): Public Policy and Higher Education. Needham Heights, S. 103–124

Goddard, J. (1997): Managing the University/Regional Interface. In: Higher Education Management, Vol. 9, Nr. 3, 1997, S. 7–27

Goedegebuure, L. et al. (1993): Hochschulpolitik in den Niederlanden. in: Bertelsmann Stiftung (Hrsg.) (1993): Hochschulpolitik im internationalen Vergleich. Gütersloh, S. 262–290

HEFCE (Higher Education Funding Council for England) (1998): Funding Higher Education in England. How the HEFCE allocates its funds. = November 98 / 67 Guide. Bristol

ders. HEFCE (Higher Education Funding Council for England) (1999): Higher Education in the United Kingdom. = January 99 / 02 Guide. Bristol

ders. HEFCE (Higher Education Funding Council for England) (2000): Recurrent grants for 2000–01: final allocations (August). = publication 00/34

Jongbloed, B.; Vossensteyn, H. (1999): Performance based research funding. An international comparative perspective. Beitrag zur 12. CHER Konferenz, 17.–19. Juni 1999. Oslo

Liefner, I. (2001): Leistungsorientierte Ressourcensteuerung in Hochschulsystemen — Ein internationaler Vergleich. = Abhandlungen zu Bildungsforschung und Bildungsrecht, Nr. 9. Berlin

MinOCW (Ministerie van Onderwijs, Cultuur en Wetenschapen) (1999): Financiele Schema’s 2000–2004

NISS (National Information Services and Systems) (1999): Research Assessment Exercise in 2001. RAE 2/99. Guidance on Submissions. http://www.niss.ac.uk/education/hefc/rae2001/ 2_99.html 05.11.1999

Patrick, W.J.; Stanley, E.C. (1998): Teaching and Research Quality Indicators and the Shaping of Higher Education. In: Research in Higher Education, Vol. 39, Nr. 1, 1998, S. 19–41

Revilla Diez, J. (2000): The Importance of Public Research Institutes in Innovative Networks — Empirical Results from the Metropolitan Innovation Systems Barcelona, Stockholm and Vienna. In: European Planning Studies, Vol. 8, Nr. 4, S. 451–463

Schätzl, L. (1999): Regionen: Kompetenzzentren und Globalisierung. In: Hesse, H.; Rebe, B. (Hrsg.) (1999): Vision und Verantwortung. Herausforderungen an der Schwelle zum neuen Jahrtausend. Hildesheim. S. 97–107

Seeber, J. (1985): Regionalwirtschaftliche Wirkungen von Hochschulen. Vergleichende empirische Untersuchung in der Bundesrepublik Deutschland. Beiträge des Instituts für Verwaltungsforschung und Regionalwissenschaft, Nr. 4. Oldenburg

Stihl, H. P. (1998): Die deutschen Hochschulen vor Veränderungen. In: Das Hochschulwesen, Nr. 1, 1998, S. 24–30

The State of Texas. The Coordinating Board (1998): General Appropriations Act, 75th Legislature, Article III (Education), Special Provisions. http://www.thecb.state.tx.us/divisions/finance/ uac/formulas9899.htm. 06.08.1999

UT Austin (The University of Texas at Austin) (1999): Comparison of Annual Operating Budgets. (unveröffentl.)

UT-System (The University of Texas System) (1998): Annual Report 1996–1997. Financial Report 1996. Austin

dass. UT-System (The University of Texas System) (2000): Reporting Package for the Board of Regents. Budget Summary Report. http://www.utsystem.edu/BUD 15.11.2000

VSNU (Vereniging van Samenwerkende Nederlandse Universiteiten) (1998): KUO 1998. Kengetallen Universitair Onderwijs. Utrecht

Williams, G. (1997): The market route to mass higher education: British experience 1979–1996. In: Higher Education Policy. Vol. 10, Nr. 3-4, S. 275–289