“Most Rural” space — a regional-demographic justification for a spatial category Authors Wolfgang Weiß Geographisches Institut, Ernst-Moritz-Arndt-Universität, Friedrich-Ludwig-Jahn-Straße 16, 17489, Greifswald DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03183058 Keywords: Article Abstract Funding provided under theAufbau Ost («Rebuilding the East») programme and other forms of financial transfer to theLänder (federal states) of eastern Germany have up to now been at their least effective in the area to the east of the River Elbe. Indeed, many of the instruments of both regional structure policy and economic development policy which have repeatedly proved their worth in the rural areas of the former West Germany have failed in the north-east. This area seems to be something of a bottomless pit. From a regional-demographic perspective, this region has to be clearly distinguished from more “ordinary” rural space, and assigned to a distinct new category to be termed “most rural space”. Downloads Download data is not yet available. References Weiß, Wolfgang (Hrsg.) (1996): Mecklenburg-Vorpommern. Brücke zum Norden und Tor zum Osten. 1. Aufl. = Perthes Länderprofile: Geographische Strukturen, Entwicklungen, Probleme. Gotha Weiß, Wolfgang; Brunner, Dieter; Hilbig, Antje; Müller, Bernhard: Das Zentrale-Orte-System in Mecklenburg-Vorpommern. Überlegungen zur Weiterentwicklung unter besonderer Beachtung der Erfahrungen mit dem bestehenden System. Grundlagenstudie und Zwischenbericht. Projekt im Auftrage des Ministeriums für Bau, Landesentwicklung und Umwelt in Mecklenburg-Vorpommern, populus et regio, Kreutzmannshagen, Greifswald 1997/98. (unveröff.) Weiß, Wolfgang; Hilbig, Antje (1998): Selektivität von Migrationsprozessen am Beispiel Mecklenburg-Vorpommern. In: Informationen zur Raumentwicklung, H. 11, 12, S. 793–802 Downloads PDF (German) Published 2002-05-31 Issue Vol. 60 No. 3-4 (2002) Section Research Article License Copyright (c) 2002 RuR Editors This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported License. Articles in Raumforschung und Raumordnung – Spatial Research and Planning are published under a Creative Commons license. From Vol. 79 No. 2 (2021), the license applied is CC BY 4.0. From Vol. 77 No. 1 to Vol. 79 No.1, articles were published under a CC BY-SA license. Earlier volumes have been re-published by oekom 2022 under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License CC BY 4.0. How to Cite 1.Weiß W. “Most Rural” space — a regional-demographic justification for a spatial category. RuR [Internet]. 2002 May 31 [cited 2024 Dec. 2];60(3-4):248–254. Available from: https://rur.oekom.de/index.php/rur/article/view/1603 More Citation Formats ACM ACS APA ABNT Chicago Harvard IEEE MLA Turabian Vancouver Download Citation Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS) BibTeX Share
A new Issue has been published October 30, 2024 A new issue of the Open-Access-Journal "Raumforschung und Raumordnung | Spatial Research and Planning" has been published. Volume 82 No. 5 (2024) is now available on our website.
A new Issue has been published August 30, 2024 A new issue of the Open-Access-Journal "Raumforschung und Raumordnung | Spatial Research and Planning" has been published. Volume 82 No. 4 (2024) is now available on our website.
A new Issue has been published June 28, 2024 A new issue of the Open-Access-Journal "Raumforschung und Raumordnung | Spatial Research and Planning" has been published. Volume 82 No. 3 (2024) is now available on our website.