Who drives urban densification? Linking landownership and spatial dynamics

Denise Ehrhardt; Felicitas Sommer; Mouhamadou  Ndim; Juste Raimbault; Thomas Hartmann; Mathias Jehling

doi:10.14512/rur.2977

Authors

Denise Ehrhardt Leibniz Institute of Ecological Urban and Regional Development
Felicitas Sommer Technical University of Munich
Mouhamadou Ndim Université Gustave Eiffel - IGN/ENSG
Juste Raimbault Université Gustave Eiffel - IGN/ENSG
Thomas Hartmann TU Dortmund University
Mathias Jehling Leibniz Institute of Ecological Urban and Regional Development

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.14512/rur.2977

Keywords:

Urban densification, Infill development, Landowner , Geospatial analysis, Land policy, Dortmund

Abstract

Cities worldwide have developed policies to promote and control urban densification. However, a high proportion of densification takes place without the purview of strategic planning. It is driven by individual landowners, who hold a strong position in deciding if land is developed or not. Despite their pivotal role, knowledge on landowner involvement is highly restricted by limited access to landowner data. We address this gap and make use of a unique dataset, available for the city of Dortmund, including landowner data for each parcel in 2011 and 2021. Using a geospatial approach, we identify six forms of densification, ranging from large-scale multi-family housing development to small-scale densification with low-density housing, and provide for the first time a systematic analysis of the involvement of private individuals, private companies and the municipality in these processes. The results show that private individuals play an important role in small-scale densification, which accounts for a third of all densification in Dortmund and takes place mainly in suburban areas. Further, we show that each densification type is associated with a distinct pattern of landownership and change of landownership over time. Our findings highlight the need for customised land policy approaches that can address private landowners’ interests, in order to facilitate and direct densification processes.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Adams, D.; Disberry, A.; Hutchison, N.; Munjoma, T. (2002): Vacant urban land: Exploring ownership strategies and actions. In: Town Planning Review 73, 4, 395–416. https://doi.org/10.3828/tpr.73.4.2

Adrian, L.; Bunzel, A.; Michalski, D.; Pätzold, R. (2021): Aktive Bodenpolitik: Fundament der Stadtentwicklung. Bodenpolitische Strategien und Instrumente im Lichte der kommunalen Praxis. Berlin.

Angelini, V.; Laferrère, A.; Weber, G. (2013): Home-ownership in Europe: How did it happen? In: Advances in Life Course Research 18, 1, 83–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.alcr.2012.10.006

Baulandkommission (2019): Empfehlungen auf Grundlage der Beratungen in der Kommission für “Nachhaltige Baulandmobilisierung und Bodenpolitik” (Baulandkommission). https://www.bmwsb.bund.de/SharedDocs/downloads/Webs/BMWSB/DE/veroeffentlichungen/bauen/Handlungsempfehlungen-Baulandkommission.pdf?__blob=publicationFile&v=2 (23.01.2025).

Beck, M.; Gerend, J. (2023): Die sozialen Aspekte von Baulücken. Weidenbach.

Bibby, P.; Henneberry, J.; Halleux, J.-M. (2020): Under the radar? ’Soft’ residential densification in England, 2001–2011. In: Environment and Planning B: Urban Analytics and City Science 47, 1, 102–118. https://doi.org/10.1177/2399808318772842

Bibby, P.; Henneberry, J.; Halleux, J.-M. (2021): Incremental residential densification and urban spatial justice: The case of England between 2001 and 2011. In: Urban Studies 58, 10, 2117–2138. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098020936967

Broitman, D.; Koomen, E. (2015): Residential density change: Densification and urban expansion. In: Computers, Environment and Urban Systems 54, 32–46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2015.05.006

Broitman, D.; Koomen, E. (2020): The attraction of urban cores: Densification in Dutch city centres. In: Urban Studies 57, 9, 1920–1939. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098019864019

Buitelaar, E.; Segeren, A. (2011): Urban Structures and Land. The Morphological Effects of Dealing with Property Rights. In: Housing Studies 26, 5, 661–679. https://doi.org/10.1080/02673037.2011.581909

Charmes, E.; Keil, R. (2015): The Politics of Post-Suburban Densification in Canada and France. In: International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 39, 3, 581–602. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2427.12194

Christ, M.; Lage, J.; Sommer, B.; Carstensen, J.; Petersen, D.; Böcker, M.; Mahrt, L.; Brüggemann, H.; Zehrfeld, C.T. (2024): Putting sufficiency into practice: Transdisciplinary sufficiency research in urban development: The Hafen-Ost real-world laboratory in Flensburg, Germany. In: GAIA – Ecological Perspectives for Science and Society 33, S1, 26–34. https://doi.org/10.14512/gaia.33.S1.5

Claassens, J.; Koomen, E.; Rouwendal, J. (2020): Urban density and spatial planning: The unforeseen impacts of Dutch devolution. In: Plos One 15, 10, e0240738. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0240738

Darr, C.; Luft, J. (2022): Gemeingut Boden – Erbbaurechte zur Stärkung des Gemeinwohls in der kooperativen Stadt. In: Abt, J.; Blecken, L.; Bock, S.; Diringer, J.; Fahrenkrug, K. (eds.): Von Beteiligung zur Koproduktion. Wege der Zusammenarbeit von Kommune und Bürgerschaft für eine zukunftsfähige kommunale Entwicklung. Wiesbaden, 363–386. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-36181-5_14

Debrunner, G.; Gairing, M. (2024): Who Densifies Our Cities, Where, and How? Contribution of Systematic Landownership and Property Data Analyses to Effective Settlement Densification. Zürich. https://doi.org/10.3929/ethz-b-000661636

Debrunner, G.; Hengstermann, A.; Gerber, J.-D. (2020): The business of densification: distribution of power, wealth and inequality in Swiss policy making. In: Town Planning Review 91, 3, 259–281. https://doi.org/10.3828/tpr.2020.15

Dembski, S.; Hartmann, T.; Hengstermann, A.; Dunning, R. (2020): Enhancing understanding of strategies of land policy for urban densification. In: Town Planning Review 91, 3, 209–216. https://doi.org/10.3828/tpr.2020.12

Desmarais, A.A.; Qualman, D.; Magnan, A.; Wiebe, N. (2015): Land grabbing and land concentration: Mapping changing patterns of farmland ownership in three rural municipalities in Saskatchewan, Canada. In: Canadian Food Studies / La Revue Canadienne des Études sur l’alimentation 2, 1, 16–47. https://doi.org/10.15353/cfs-rcea.v2i1.52

Deutscher Bundestag (2021): Stadtentwicklungsbericht der Bundesregierung 2020. Berlin. = BT-Drucksache 19/28900.

Dunning, R.; Hickman, H.; While, A. (2020): Planning control and the politics of soft densification. In: Town Planning Review 91, 3, 305–324. https://doi.org/10.3828/tpr.2020.17

Ehrhardt, D.; Behnisch, M.; Jehling, M.; Michaeli, M. (2023): Mapping soft densification: a geospatial approach for identifying residential infill potentials. In: Buildings and Cities, 4, 1, 193–211. https://doi.org/10.5334/bc.295

Eichhorn, S. (2023): Infilling in Germany. Estimating the extent of infilling in German municipalities between 1979 and 2011. In: Landscape and Urban Planning 240, 104895. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2023.104895

Eichhorn, S.; Ehrhardt, D.; Münter, A.; Behnisch, M.; Jehling, M. (2024): Understanding land take by low-density residential areas: An institutionalist perspective on local planning authorities, developers and households. In: Land Use Policy 143, 107198. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2024.107198

GAA Dortmund – Der Gutachterausschuss für Grundstückswerte in der Stadt Dortmund (2024): Grundstücksmarktbericht 2024 für die Stadt Dortmund. Dortmund.

Gallagher, R.; Sigler, T.; Liu, Y. (2019): Targeted urban consolidation or ad hoc redevelopment? The influence of cadastral structure and change on the urban form of Brisbane, Australia. In: Urban Geography 41, 2, 183–204. https://doi.org/10.1080/02723638.2019.1663058

Gallagher, R.; Sigler, T.; Liu, Y. (2020): ‘Protect the Brisbane backyard!’ (Except from subdivision for additional house construction). In: Australian Planner 56, 4, 278–289. https://doi.org/10.1080/07293682.2020.1854800

Gerber, J.-D.; Hartmann, T.; Hengstermann, A. (2018) (eds.): Instruments of Land Policy: Dealing with Scarcity of Land. London. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315511658

Gerber, J.-D.; Knoepfel, P.; Nahrath, S.; Varone, F. (2009): Institutional Resource Regimes: Towards sustainability through the combination of property-rights theory and policy analysis. In: Ecological Economics 68, 3, 798–809. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2008.06.013

Götze, V.; Bouwmeester, J.A.; Jehling, M. (2024): For whom do we densify? Explaining income variation across densification projects in the region of Utrecht, the Netherlands. In: Urban Studies 61,7, 1273–1290. https://doi.org/10.1177/00420980231205793

Götze, V.; Jehling, M. (2023): Comparing types and patterns: A context-oriented approach to densification in Switzerland and the Netherlands. In: Environment and Planning B: Urban Analytics and City Science 50, 6, 1645–1659. https://doi.org/10.1177/23998083221142198

Hartmann, T.; Dembski, S.; Hengstermann, A.; Dunning, R. (2022): Land for densification: how land policy and property matter. In: Town Planning Review 94, 5, 465–473. https://doi.org/10.3828/tpr.2022.22

Hartmann, T.; Spit, T. (2015): Dilemmas of involvement in land management – Comparing an active (Dutch) and a passive (German) approach. In: Land Use Policy 42, 729–737. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2014.10.004

Hecht, R.; Meinel, G.; Buchroithner, M. (2015): Automatic identification of building types based on topographic databases – a comparison of different data sources. In: International Journal of Cartography 1, 1, 18–31. https://doi.org/10.1080/23729333.2015.1055644

Hengstermann, A.; Skala, N. (2023): Making land available. Cultural legal comparison of the German Building Land Mobilisation Act and the partial revision of the Swiss Spatial Planning Act. In: Raumforschung und Raumordnung | Spatial Research and Planning 81, 6, 591–604. https://doi.org/10.14512/rur.1655

Jänicke, C.; Müller, D. (2024): Revealing agricultural land ownership concentration with cadastral and company network data. In: Agriculture and Human Values. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10460-024-10590-3

Jehling, M.; Hecht, R. (2022): Do land policies make a difference? A data-driven approach to trace effects on urban form in France and Germany. In: Environment and Planning B: Urban Analytics and City Science 49, 1, 114–130. https://doi.org/10.1177/2399808321995818

Künzel, K.; Korekt, J.; Artmann, N.; Blankertz, S.; Böhrk, L.; Render, J. (2024): Urban Densification: Understanding landowners’ inertia in building on vacant lots. In: disP – The Planning Review 60, 2, 40–51. https://doi.org/10.1080/02513625.2024.2424124

Lowndes, V.; Roberts, M. (2013): Why Institutions Matter: The New Institutionalism in Political Science. Basingstoke.

Meijer, R.; Buitelaar, E. (2023): What drives developers? Understanding vertical (dis)integration strategies in the land development process. In: Land Use Policy 131, 106718. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2023.106718

Müller, D.; Rufin, P.; Schwieder, M. (2021): Quantification of Ownership Concentration from Cadastral Records of Agricultural Land in Märkisch-Oderland. Berlin.

Newton, P.W. (2010): Beyond Greenfield and Brownfield: The Challenge of Regenerating Australia’s Greyfield Suburbs. In: Built Environment 36, 1, 81–104. https://doi.org/10.2148/benv.36.1.81

Newton, P.; Glackin, S.; Witheridge, J.; Garner, L. (2020): Beyond small lot subdivision: towards municipality-initiated and resident-supported precinct scale medium density residential infill regeneration in greyfield suburbs. In: Urban Policy and Research 38, 4, 338–356. https://doi.org/10.1080/08111146.2020.1815186

Pinnegar, S.; Randolph, B.; Freestone, R. (2015): Incremental urbanism: characteristics and implications of residential renewal through owner-driven demolition and rebuilding. In: The Town Planning Review 86, 3, 279–301. https://doi.org/10.3828/tpr.2015.18

Puustinen, T.; Krigsholm, P.; Falkenbach, H. (2022): Land policy conflict profiles for different densification types: A literature-based approach. In: Land Use Policy 123, 106405. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2022.106405

Puustinen, T.; Pennanen, K.; Falkenbach, H.; Arvola, A.; Viitanen, K. (2017): Financing major repairs in apartment buildings through infill development: Exploring views and benefit requirements of the owner-occupiers. In: Property Management 35, 5, 508–527. https://doi.org/10.1108/PM-08-2016-0045

Sommer, F.; de Vries, W.T. (2023): Values and representations in land registers and their legal, technical, social effects on land rights as an administrative artefact. In: Land Use Policy 135, 106946. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2023.106946

Stadt Dortmund, Amt für Wohnen (2023a): Bericht zum kleinräumigen Wohnungsmarktmonitoring. Auswertungsjahr 2021. Dortmund.

Stadt Dortmund, Amt für Wohnen (2023b): Wohnungsmarktbericht 2023. Ergebnisse des Wohnungsmarktbeobachtungssystems 2022. Dortmund.

Teller, J. (2021): Regulating urban densification: what factors should be used? In: Buildings and Cities 2, 1, 302–317. https://doi.org/10.5334/bc.123

Tietz, A.; Neumann, R.; Volkenand, S. (2021): Untersuchung der Eigentumsstrukturen von Landwirtschaftsfläche in Deutschland. Braunschweig. = Thünen-Report 85. https://doi.org/10.3220/REP1616572218000

Touati-Morel, A. (2015): Hard and Soft Densification Policies in the Paris City-Region. In: International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 39, 3, 603–612. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2427.12195

Trautvetter, C.; Bonczyk, S. (2019): Profitmaximierer oder verantwortungsvolle Vermieter? Große Immobilienunternehmen mit mehr als 3.000 Wohnungen in Berlin im Profil. Berlin.

van Loon, J. (2016): Patient versus impatient capital: the (non-) financialization of real estate developers in the Low Countries. In: Socio-Economic Review 14, 4, 709–728. https://doi.org/10.1093/ser/mww021

Wellmann, T.; Schug, F.; Haase, D.; Pflugmacher, D.; van der Linden, S. (2020): Green growth? On the relation between population density, land use and vegetation cover fractions in a city using a 30-years Landsat time series. In: Landscape and Urban Planning 202, 103857. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2020.103857

Wicki, M.; Kaufmann, D. (2022): Accepting and resisting densification: The importance of project-related factors and the contextualizing role of neighbourhoods. In: Landscape and Urban Planning 220, 104350. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2021.104350

Wijburg, G.; Aalbers, M.B. (2017): The alternative financialization of the German housing market. In: Housing Studies 32, 7, 968–989. https://doi.org/10.1080/02673037.2017.1291917

Xavier, E.M.A.; Ariza-López, F.J.; Ureña-Cámara, M.A. (2016): A Survey of Measures and Methods for Matching Geospatial Vector Datasets. In: ACM Computing Surveys 49, 2, 39,1–34. https://doi.org/10.1145/2963147.