Is there a Need for Proximity in the Urban Knowledge Economy? A Geostatistical Analysis of Research Cluster in Vienna

Authors

  • Robert Musil Institut für Stadt- und Regionalforschung, Österreichische Akademie der Wissenschaften, Postgasse 7/4/2, 1010, Wien, Österreich
  • Jakob Eder Institut für Stadt- und Regionalforschung, Österreichische Akademie der Wissenschaften, Postgasse 7/4/2, 1010, Wien, Österreich

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1007/s13147-016-0458-8

Keywords:

Urban economy, Local buzz, Global pipelines, Clusters, Vienna

Abstract

Urbanization and the knowledge economy are two concepts which are interlinked and therefore agglomerations are nowadays often considered as the centres of innovation. However, the importance of local buzz, in other words the spontaneous exchange of actors, and the existence of a tacit knowledge, was questioned in more recent empirical studies. There are indications that the access to global pipelines might be more important. Based on the analysis of 1,363 research facilities in Vienna (using spatial-statistical methods), the spatial patterns of Vienna’s research sector (considering five sub-sectors) are determined and pronounced concentrations are found. In addition, expert interviews show that the relevance of local and/or international cooperation as well as the reasons which lead to “knowledge clusters” cannot be generalized. Spatial proximity is sometimes caused by historical locations and has different meanings for different research sectors. Hence, spatial proximity should not necessarily be seen as contradictory to the increasing importance of global pipelines, which is observed in recent studies. On the one hand, spatial proximity reduces risks, which are side effects of international cooperation. On the other hand, it is actually inevitable in some research sectors. This leads to the following conclusions: First, the innovation research should take sector specific tendencies for concentrations more into account. Second, urban policy makers are advised to consider in detail the specific needs of the actors in question. In doing so, it is more likely, that research and development policies will succeed.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Aalbers, R. (2010): The role of contracts and trust in R&D alliances in the Dutch biotech sector. In: Innovation: Management, Policy & Practice 12, 3, 311-329.

Aitken, S.; Kwan, M.-P. (2010): GIS as Qualitative Research: Knowledge, Participatory Politics and Cartographies of Affect. In: DeLyser, D.; Herbert, S.; Aitken, S.; Crang, M.; McDowell, L. (Hrsg.): The SAGE Handbook of Qualitative Geography. Los Angeles, 287-304.

Asheim, B. T.; Coenen, L. (2005): Knowledge bases and regional innovation systems: Comparing Nordic clusters. In: Research Policy 34, 8, 1173-1190.

Asheim, B. T.; Coenen, L.; Vang, J. (2007): Face-to-face, buzz, and knowledge bases: sociospatial implications for learning, innovation, and innovation policy. In: Environment and Planning C 25, 5, 655-670.

Barlevy, G. (2005): Why don’t recessions encourage more R&D spending? Chicago. = Chicago Fed Letter 220.

Bathelt, H. (2008): Knowledge-based clusters: regional multiplier models and the role of ‘buzz’ and ‘pipelines’. In: Karlsson, C. (Hrsg.): Handbook of Research on Cluster Theory. Cheltenham, 78-92.

Bathelt, H.; Malmberg, A.; Maskell, P. (2004): Clusters and knowledge: local buzz, global pipelines and the process of knowledge creation. In: Progress in Human Geography 28, 1, 31-56.

Bergman, E. M.; Feser, E. J. (1999): Industrial and Regional Clusters: Concepts and Comparative Applications. http://www.rri.wvu.edu/webbook/bergman-feser/contents.htm (16.10.2016).

Boschma, R. (2005): Proximity and Innovation: A Critical Assessment. In: Regional Studies 39, 1, 61-74.

Brandt, A.; Hahn, C.; Krätke, S.; Kiese, M. (2009): Metropolitan regions in the knowledge economy: network analysis as a strategic information tool. In: Tijdschrift voor economische en sociale geografie 100, 2, 236-249.

Cincera, M.; Cozza, C.; Tübke, A.; Voigt, P. (2010): Doing R&D or not (in a crisis), that is the question… Luxemburg. = IPTS Working Paper on Corporate R&D and Innovation 12/2010.

Crevoisier, O. (2001): Der Ansatz des kreativen Milieus. Bestandsaufnahme und Forschungsperspektiven am Beispiel urbaner Milieus. In: Zeitschrift für Wirtschaftsgeographie 45, 3‑4, 246-256.

DeBresson, C.; Hu, X. (1999): Identifying clusters of innovative activity: A new approach and a toolbox. In: OECD (Hrsg.): Boosting Innovation. The Cluster Approach. Paris, 27-59.

Egartner, S.; Fischer, T.; Maißer, M.; Meth, D.; Steinbichler, M.; Wächter, P.; Voigt, A. (2008): Stadt der kurzen Wege aus ökosozialer Sicht. Nahversorgung und Naherholung in Wien vor dem Hintergrund der Alterung. Wien.

Feldman, M. P.; Audretsch, D. B. (1999): Innovation in cities: Science-based diversity, specialization and localized competition. In: European Economic Review 43, 2, 409-429.

Feser, E.; Renski, H.; Goldstein, H. (2008): Clusters and Economic Development Outcomes. An Analysis of the Link between Clustering and Industry Growth. In: Economic Development Quarterly 22, 4, 324-344.

Florida, R. (2002): The Rise of the Creative Class. New York.

Fromhold-Eisebith, M. (1999): Das „kreative Milieu“ – nur theoretisches Konzept oder Instrument der Regionalentwicklung? In: Raumforschung und Raumordnung 57, 2‑3, 168-175.

Gertler, M. (2008): Buzz without being there? Communities of Practice in Context. In: Ash, A.; Roberts, J. (Hrsg.): Community, Economic Creativity, and Organization. Oxford, 203-226.

Giuliani, E. (2007): The Selective Nature of Knowledge Networks in Clusters: Evidence from the Wine Industry. In: Journal of Economic Geography 7, 2, 139-168.

Grabher, G. (2002): Cool projects, boring institutions: temporary collaboration in social context. In: Regional Studies 36, 3, 205-214.

Hohenberg, P. M.; Hollen-Lees, L. (1985): The Making of Urban Europe 1000-1950. Cambridge, MA.

Huber, F. (2012): Do clusters really matter for innovation practices in information technology? Questioning the significance of technological knowledge spillovers. In: Journal of Economic Geography 12, 1, 107-126.

Jacobs, J. (1969): The Economy of Cities. New York.

Kiese, M. (2008): Stand und Perspektiven der regionalen Clusterforschung. In: Schätzl, L.; Kiese, M. (Hrsg.): Cluster und Regionalentwicklung. Theorie, Beratung und praktische Umsetzung. Dortmund, 9‑50.

Koo, J. (2005): Knowledge-based Industry Clusters: Evidenced by Geographical Patterns of Patents in Manufacturing. In: Urban Studies 42, 9, 1487-1505.

Kujath, H. J. (2005): Die neue Rolle der Metropolregionen in der Wissensökonomie. In: Kujath, H. J. (Hrsg.): Knoten im Netz. Zur neuen Rolle der Metropolregionen in der Dienstleistungswirtschaft und Wissensökonomie. Münster, 23-63.

Levine, N. (2013): CrimeStat IV. A Spatial Statistics Program for the Analysis of Crime Incident Locations. Washington.

Lüthi, S.; Thierstein, A.; Bentlage, M. (2010): Standortverflechtungen in der Wissensökonomie. Über die Konnektivität der Metropolregionen Rhein-Main und Rhein-Ruhr. In: Geographische Rundschau 62, 11, 46-52.

Marshall, A. (1890): Principles of Economics. London.

Martin, R.; Sunley, P. (2003): Deconstructing clusters: chaotic concept or policy panacea? In: Journal of Economic Geography 3, 1, 5‑35.

Maskell, P.; Bathelt, H.; Malmberg, A. (2006): Building global knowledge pipelines: The role of temporary clusters. In: European Planning Studies 14, 8, 997-1013.

Mayerhofer, P. (2013): Wiens Industrie in der wissensbasierten Stadtwirtschaft. Wandlungsprozesse, Wettbewerbsfähigkeit, industriepolitische Ansatzpunkte. Wien.

Moodysson, J. (2008): Principles and Practices of Knowledge Creation: On the Organization of “Buzz” and “Pipelines” in Life Science Communities. In: Economic Geography 84, 4, 449-469.

Musil, R. (2011): Die Metropolen Europas im Städtesystem des 20. Jahrhunderts. In: Matznetter, W.; Musil, R. (Hrsg.): Europa: Metropolen im Wandel. Wien, 15-38.

Musil, R.; Eder, J. (2013): Wien und seine Hochschulen. Regionale Wertschöpfungseffekte der Wiener Hochschulen. Wien. = ISR-Forschungsbericht 40.

Musil, R.; Eder, J. (2015): Local buzz in der Wiener Forschung. Wissensintensive Cluster zwischen lokale Einbettung und internationaler Orientierung. Wien. = ISR-Forschungsbericht 41.

Palme, G.; Musil, R. (2012): Wirtschaftsgeographie. Braunschweig.

Porter, M. (1990): The Competitive Advantage of Nations. New York.

Porter, M. (2000): Location, Competition, and Economic Development: Local Clusters in a Global Economy. In: Economic Development Quarterly 14, 1, 15-34.

Sassen, S. (1991): The global city. London, New York, Tokyo, Princeton.

Silverman, B. W. (1986): Density Estimation for Statistics and Data Analysis. London.

Simmie, J.; Strambach, S. (2006): The contribution of KIBS to innovation in cities: an evolutionary and institutional perspective. In: Journal of Knowledge Management 10, 5, 26-40.

Stiewe, M.; Mühlhans, H.; Bohnet, M.; Fricke, T.; Heller, S. (2012): Potenziale und Wirkungen standortbezogenen Mobilitätsmanagements. In: Schrenk, M.; Popvich, V.; Zeile, P.; Elisei, P. (Hrsg.): REAL CORP 2012. Re-Mixing the City. Towards Sustainability and Resilience? Schwechat, 605-614. = Proceedings REAL CORP 2012.

Storper, M.; Venables, A. J. (2004): Buzz: face-to-face contact and the urban economy. In: Journal of Economic Geography 4, 4, 351-370.

Sui, D.; DeLyser, D. (2012): Crossing the qualitative-quantitative chasm I: Hybrid geographies, the spatial turn, and volunteered geographic information (VGI). In: Progress in Human Geography 36, 1, 111-124.

Taylor, P. (2004): World City Network. A global urban analysis. London, New York.

Tödtling, F.; Trippl, M. (2007): Knowledge Links in High-technology Industries: Markets, Networks or Milieu? The Case of the Vienna Biotechnology Cluster. In: International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Innovation Management 7, 2‑5, 345-365.

Trippl, M.; Tödtling, F. (2007): Developing Biotechnology Clusters in Non-high Technology Regions. The Case of Austria. In: Industry and Innovation 14, 1, 47-67.

Trippl, M.; Tödtling, F. (2011): Regionale Innovationssysteme und Wissenstransfer im Spannungsfeld unterschiedlicher Näheformen. In: Ibert, O.; Kujath, H. J. (Hrsg.): Räume der Wissensarbeit. Zur Funktion von Nähe und Distanz in der Wissensökonomie. Wiesbaden, 155-169.

Trippl, M.; Tödtling, F.; Lengauer, L. (2009): Knowledge Sourcing beyond Buzz and Pipelines: Evidence from the Vienna Software Sector. In: Economic Geography 85, 4, 443-462.

van Winden, W. (2010): Knowledge and the European City. In: Tijdschrift voor economische en sociale geografie 101, 1, 100-106.

Weidmann, U. (1992): Transporttechnik der Fussgänger. Transporttechnische Eigenschaften des Fussgängerverkehrs. Literaturauswertung. Zürich. = Schriftenreihe des IVT 90.

Wirth, M. (2013): Der Campus Vienna Biocenter. Entstehung, Entwicklung und Bedeutung für den Life Sciences-Standort Wien. Innsbruck. = Innovationsmuster in der österreichischen Wirtschaftsgeschichte 8.

Downloads

Published

2017-04-30

Issue

Section

Research Article

How to Cite

1.
Musil R, Eder J. Is there a Need for Proximity in the Urban Knowledge Economy? A Geostatistical Analysis of Research Cluster in Vienna. RuR [Internet]. 2017 Apr. 30 [cited 2024 May 19];75(2):93–107. Available from: https://rur.oekom.de/index.php/rur/article/view/462