From Real-World Labs to Urban Experiments: German and International Debates

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.14512/rur.48

Keywords:

Real-World Labs, Urban Living Labs, Experiments, Scaling, Sustainability transition

Abstract

In recent years, real-world labs have become an important part of application-related sustainability research in Germany and Europe. Currently, the international academic debate is shifting more and more towards research on local experiments. Against this backdrop, this paper serves in particular the purpose of placing the German-speaking research on real-world labs within international debates, and of comparing it systematically with debates on urban living labs and experiments. In this context, we concentrate especially on the basic assumptions of these three approaches, their origins and areas of application as well as the importance of learning processes. Although all three approaches aim at urban sustainability transformations, not much is known about their medium- and long-term impacts. Their temporal and spatial scaling, which is critical here, was recognized as problem but has barely become object of systematic research. This paper follows the purpose to enrich the German debate on real-world labs and to link it to the international discussion.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Abel, P. (2020): Living Lab: Forschung und Praxis am Universitätscampus. In: HMD Praxis der Wirtschaftsinformatik 57, 2, 285–295. https://doi.org/10.1365/s40702-020-00593-z

Bai, X.; Roberts, B.; Chen, J. (2010): Urban sustainability experiments in Asia: patterns and pathways. In: Environmental Science und Policy 13, 4, 312–325. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2010.03.011

Bajgier, S. M.; Maragah, H. D.; Saccucci, M. S.; Verzilli, A.; Prybutok, V. R. (1991): Introducing students to community operations research by using a city neighborhood as a living laboratory. In: Operations Research 39, 5, 701–709. https://doi.org/10.1287/opre.39.5.701

Bauer, T. (2018): Research on Real-World Laboratories in Baden-Württemberg. In: GAIA – Ecological Perspectives for Science and Society 27, S1, 4. https://doi.org/10.14512/gaia.27.S1.2

Beecroft, R.; Trenks, H.; Rhodius, R.; Benighaus, C.; Parodi, O. (2018): Reallabore als Rahmen transformativer und transdisziplinärer Forschung: Ziele und Designprinzipien. In: Di Giulio, A.; Defila, R. (Hrsg.): Transdisziplinär und transformativ forschen. Wiesbaden, 75-100. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-21530-9_4

Bergmann, M.; Jahn, T. (2017): Frameworks for transdisciplinary research: Framework #2. In: GAIA – Ecological Perspectives for Science and Society 26, 4, 304. https://doi.org/10.14512/gaia.26.4.3

Borner, J.; Kraft, A. H. (2018): Konzeptpapier zum Reallabor-Ansatz. http://komob.de/wp-content/uploads/2018/08/ENavi_Reallabore_Borner-Kraft.pdf

Bulkeley, H.; Castán Broto, V. (2013): Government by experiment? Global cities and the governing of climate change. In: Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers 38, 3, 361–375. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-5661.2012.00535.x

Bulkeley, H.; Castán Broto, V.; Edwards, G. A. S. (2015): An Urban Politics of Climate Change. Experimentation and the Governing of Socio-technical Transitions. London.

Bulkeley, H.; Coenen, L.; Frantzeskaki, N.; Hartmann, C.; Kronsell, A.; Mai, L.; Marvin, S.; McCormick, K.; van Steenbergen, F.; Voytenko Palgan, Y. (2016): Urban living labs: governing urban sustainability transitions. In: Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability 22, 13–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2017.02.003

Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung (2015): Zukunftsstadt. Strategische Forschungs- und Innovationsagenda. Berlin.

Cairney, P.; Oliver, K. (2020): How should academics engage in policymaking to achieve impact? In: Political Studies Review 18, 2, 228–244. https://doi.org/10.1177/1478929918807714

Caniglia, G.; Schäpke, N.; Lang, D. J.; Abson, D. J.; Luederitz, C.; Wiek, A.; Laubichler, M. D.; Gralla, F.; von Wehrden, H. (2017): Experiments and evidence in sustainability science: A typology. In: Journal of Cleaner Production 169, 39–47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.05.164

Castán Broto, V.; Bulkeley, H. (2013a): A survey of urban climate change experiments in 100 cities. In: Global Environmental Change 23, 1, 92–102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2012.07.005

Castán Broto, V.; Bulkeley, H. (2013b): Maintaining climate change experiments: urban political ecology and the everyday reconfiguration of urban infrastructure. In: International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 37, 6, 1934–1948. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2427.12050

Chesbrough, H. W. (2003): Open Innovation. The New Imperative for Creating and Profiting from Technology. Boston.

Defila, R.; Di Giulio, A. (2018): What Is It Good For? Reflecting and Systematizing Accompanying Research to Research Programs. In: GAIA – Ecological Perspectives for Science and Society 27, S1, 97–104. https://doi.org/10.14512/gaia.27.S1.17

Dewey, J. (1927): The Public and its Problems. An Essay in Political Inquiry. University Park.

Dunlop, C. A.; Radaelli, C. M. (2018): The lessons of policy learning: types, triggers, hindrances and pathologies. In: Policy and Politics 46, 2, 255–272. https://doi.org/10.1332/030557318X15230059735521

Engels, A.; Walz, K. (2018): Dealing with multi-perspectivity in Real-World Laboratories: experiences from the transdisciplinary research project ‘Urban Transformation Laboratories’. In: GAIA – Ecological Perspectives for Science and Society 27, S1, 39–45. https://doi.org/10.14512/gaia.27.S1.10

Engels, F.; Rogge, J.-C. (2018): Tensions and trade-offs in Real-World Laboratories: the participants’ perspective. In: GAIA – Ecological Perspectives for Science and Society 27, S1, 28–31. https://doi.org/10.14512/gaia.27.S1.8

Eskelinen, J.; Garcia Robles, A.; Lindy, I.; Marsh, J. B.; Muente-Kunigami, A. (2015): Citizen-driven Innovation. A Guidebook for City Mayors and Public Administrators. Washington D.C.

Evans, J. (2012): Environmental Governance. London.

Evans, J.; Karvonen, A. (2011): Living laboratories for sustainability: Exploring the politics and epistemology of urban adaptation. In: Bulkeley, H.; Castán Broto, V.; Hodson, M.; Marvin, S. (Hrsg.): Cities and Low Carbon Transitions. London, 126–141. = Routledge Studies in Human Geography 35.

Evans, J.; Karvonen, A.; Raven, R. (2016): The experimental city. New modes and prospects of urban transformation. In: Evans, J.; Karvonen, A.; Raven, R. (Hrsg.): The Experimental City. London, 1–12.

Fuenfschilling, L.; Frantzeskaki, N.; Coenen, L. (2019): Urban experimentation and sustainability transitions. In: European Planning Studies 27, 2, 219–228. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2018.1532977

Groß, M.; Hoffmann-Riem, H.; Krohn, W. (2005): Realexperimente. Ökologische Gestaltungsprozesse in der Wissensgesellschaft. Bielefeld. https://doi.org/10.14361/9783839403044

Grunwald, A.; Schäfer, M.; Bergmann, M. (2020): Neue Formate transdisziplinärer Forschung. Ausdifferenzierte Brücken zwischen Wissenschaft und Praxis. In: GAIA – Ecological Perspectives for Science and Society 29, 2, 106–114. https://doi.org/10.14512/gaia.29.2.8

Hildén, M.; Jordan, A.; Huitema, D. (2017): Special issue on experimentation for climate change solutions editorial: The search for climate change and sustainability solutions – the promise and the pitfalls of experimentation. In: Journal of Cleaner Production 169, 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.09.019

Hölscher, K.; Frantzeskaki, N.; Loorbach, D. (2019): Steering transformations under climate change: capacities for transformative climate governance and the case of Rotterdam, the Netherlands. In: Regional Environmental Change 19, 3, 791–805. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10113-018-1329-3

Hoffmann, M. J. (2011): Climate Governance at the Crossroads. Experimenting with a Global Response after Kyoto. Oxford.

Hughes, S.; Yordi, S.; Besco, L. (2020): The role of pilot projects in urban climate change policy innovation. In: Policy Studies Journal 48, 2, 271–297. https://doi.org/10.1111/psj.12288

Jordan, A.; Huitema, D. (2014): Policy innovation in a changing climate: sources, patterns and effects. In: Global Environmental Change 29, 387–394. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2014.09.005

Juujärvi, S.; Pesso, K. (2013): Actor roles in an urban living lab: What can we learn from Suurpelto, Finland? In: Technology Innovation Management Review 3, 11, 22–27. https://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/742

Kivimaa, P.; Hildén, M.; Huitema, D.; Jordan, A.; Newig, J. (2017): Experiments in climate governance: A systematic review of research on energy and built environment transitions. In: Journal of Cleaner Production 169, 17–29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.01.027

Krohn, W.; Weyer, J. (1989): Gesellschaft als Labor: Die Erzeugung sozialer Risiken durch experimentelle Forschung. In: Soziale Welt 40, 3, 349–373.

Lam, D. P.; Martín-López, B.; Wiek, A.; Bennett, E. M.; Frantzeskaki, N.; Horcea-Milcu, A.; Lang, D. J. (2020): Scaling the impact of sustainability initiatives: a typology of amplification processes. In: Urban Transformations, 2, 3. https://doi.org/10.1186/s42854-020-00007-9

Marvin, S.; Bulkeley, H.; Mai, L.; McCormick, K.; Voytenko Palgan, Y. (2018): Introduction. In: Marvin, S.; Bulkeley, H.; Mai, L.; McCormick, K.; Voytenko Palgan, Y. (Hrsg.): Urban Living Labs. Experimentation with City Futures. London, 1–17.

McCrory, G.; Schäpke, N.; Holmén, J.; Holmberg, J. (2020): Sustainability-oriented labs in real-world contexts: An exploratory review. In: Journal of Cleaner Production 277, 123202, 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.123202

McFadgen, B.; Huitema, D. (2018): Experimentation at the interface of science and policy: A multi-case analysis of how policy experiments influence political decision-makers. In: Policy Sciences 51, 2, 161–187. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11077-017-9276-2

Ministerium für Inneres, Digitalisierung und Migration Baden-Württemberg (2017): digital@bw. Digitalisierungsstrategie der Landesregierung Baden-Württemberg. Stuttgart.

Ministerium für Umwelt, Klima und Energiewirtschaft Baden-Württemberg (2014): Nachhaltigkeitsstrategie Baden-Württemberg. Stuttgart.

Moloney, S.; Horne, R. (2015): Low carbon urban transitioning: from local experimentation to urban transformation? In: Sustainability 7, 3, 2437-2453. https://doi.org/10.3390/su7032437

Morehouse, S. M.; Jewell, M. E. (2004): States as laboratories: a reprise. In: Annual Review of Political Science 7, 177–203. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.polisci.7.012003.104913

Nesti, G. (2015): Living labs: A new tool for co-production? In: Bisello, A.; Vettorato, D.; Stephens, R.; Elisei, P. (Hrsg.): Smart and Sustainable Planning for Cities and Regions. Cham, 267–281. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-44899-2_16

Nesti, G. (2018): Co-production for innovation: The urban living lab experience. In: Policy and Society 37, 3, 310–325. https://doi.org/10.1080/14494035.2017.1374692

Parodi, O.; Beecroft, R.; Albiez, M.; Quint, A.; Seebacher, A.; Tamm, K.; Waitz, C. (2017): The ABC of real-world lab methodology: from ‘action research’ to ‘participation’ and beyond. In: Trialog 3‑4, 74–82.

Parodi, O.; Waitz, C.; Bachinger, M.; Kuhn, R.; Meyer-Soylu, S.; Alcántara, S.; Rhodius, R. (2018): Insights into and recommendations from three Real-World Laboratories: An experience-based comparison. In: GAIA – Ecological Perspectives for Science and Society 27, S1, 52–59. https://doi.org/10.14512/gaia.27.S1.12

Peng, Y.; Bai, X. (2018): Experimenting towards a low-carbon city: Policy evolution and nested structure of innovation. In: Journal of Cleaner Production 174, 201–212. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.10.116

Peng, Y.; Wei, Y.; Bai, X. (2019): Scaling urban sustainability experiments: contextualization as an innovation. In: Journal of Cleaner Production 227, 302–312. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.04.061

Renn, O. (2018): Real-World Laboratories – the road to transdisciplinary research? In: GAIA – Ecological Perspectives for Science and Society 27, S1, 1. https://doi.org/10.14512/gaia.27.S1.1

Renn, O. (2021): Transdisciplinarity: Synthesis towards a modular approach. In: Futures 130, 102744, 1‑18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2021.102744

Rogga, S.; Zscheischler, J.; Gaasch, N. (2018): How much of the Real-World Laboratory is hidden in current transdisciplinary research? In: GAIA – Ecological Perspectives for Science and Society 27, S1, 18–22. https://doi.org/10.14512/gaia.27.S1.6

Sabel, C. F.; Zeitlin, J. (2010): Learning from difference: The new architecture of experimentalist governance in the EU. In: Sabel, C.F.; Zeitlin, J. (Hrsg.): Experimentalist Governance in the European Union. Towards a New Architecture. Oxford, 1–28.

Schäpke, N.; Bergmann, M.; Stelzer, F.; Lang, D. J. (2018): Labs in the real world: Advancing transdisciplinary research and sustainability transformation: Mapping the field and emerging lines of inquiry. In: GAIA – Ecological Perspectives for Science and Society 27, S1, 8–11. https://doi.org/10.14512/gaia.27.S1.4

Schäpke, N.; Stelzer, F.; Bergmann, M.; Lang, D. (2016): Tentative Theses on Transformative Research in Real-World Laboratories. In: TATuP – Zeitschrift für Technikfolgenabschätzung in Theorie und Praxis 25, 3, 45–51. https://doi.org/10.14512/tatup.25.3.45

Schäpke, N.; Stelzer, F.; Bergmann, M.; Singer-Brodowski, M.; Wanner, M.; Caniglia, G.; Lang, D. J. (2017): Reallabore im Kontext transformativer Forschung. Ansatzpunkte zur Konzeption und Einbettung in den internationalen Forschungsstand. Lüneburg. = IETSR Discussion Papers in Transdisciplinary Sustainability Research 1/2017.

Schmidt, S.; Ibert, O.; Kuebart, A.; Kühn, J. (2016): Open Creative Labs in Deutschland: Typologisierung, Verbreitung und Entwicklungsbedingungen. Erkner.

Schneidewind, U.; Augenstein, K.; Stelzer, F.; Wanner, M. (2018): Structure Matters: Real-World Laboratories as a New Type of Large-Scale Research Infrastructure: A Framework Inspired by Giddens’ Structuration Theory. In: GAIA – Ecological Perspectives for Science and Society 27, S1, 12–17. https://doi.org/10.14512/gaia.27.S1.5

Scholl, C.; de Kraker, J.; Hoeflehner, T.; Wlasak, P.; Drage, T.; Eriksen, M. A: (2018): Transitioning urban experiments: Reflections on doing action research with urban labs. In: GAIA – Ecological Perspectives for Science and Society 27, S1, 78–84. https://doi.org/10.14512/gaia.27.S1.15

Schot, J.; Geels, F. W. (2008): Strategic niche management and sustainable innovation journeys: theory, findings, research agenda, and policy. In: Technology Analysis und Strategic Management 20, 5, 537–554. https://doi.org/10.1080/09537320802292651

Seyfang, G.; Hielscher, S.; Hargreaves, T.; Martiskainen, M.; Smith, A. (2014): A grassroots sustainable energy niche? Reflections on community energy in the UK. In: Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions 13, 21–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eist.2014.04.004

Singer-Brodowski, M.; Beecroft, R.; Parodi, O. (2018): Learning in Real-World Laboratories: a systematic impulse for discussion. In: GAIA – Ecological Perspectives for Science and Society 27, S1, 23–27. https://doi.org/10.14512/gaia.27.S1.7

Smith, A.; Raven, R. (2012): What is protective space? Reconsidering niches in transitions to sustainability. In: Research Policy 41, 6, 1025–1036. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2011.12.012

Tenberg, R. (2006): Didaktik lernfeldstrukturierten Unterrichts. Theorie und Praxis beruflichen Lernens und Lehrens. Bad Heilbrunn.

Turnheim, B.; Kivimaa, P.; Berkhout, F. (2018a): Preface. In: Turnheim, B.; Kivimaa, P.; Berkhout, F. (Hrsg.): Innovating Climate Governance. Moving beyond Experiments. Cambridge, xi–xii. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108277679.001

Turnheim, B.; Kivimaa, P.; Berkhout, F. (2018b): Beyond experiments: innovation in climate governance. In: Turnheim, B.; Kivimaa, P.; Berkhout, F. (Hrsg.): Innovating Climate Governance. Moving beyond Experiments. Cambridge, 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108277679.002

van Doren, D.; Driessen, P. P.; Runhaar, H.; Giezen, M. (2018): Scaling-up low-carbon urban initiatives: towards a better understanding. In: Urban Studies 55, 1, 175–194. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098016640456

van Winden, W.; van den Buuse, D. (2017): Smart city pilot projects: exploring the dimensions and conditions of scaling up. In: Journal of Urban Technology 24, 4, 51–72. https://doi.org/10.1080/10630732.2017.1348884

von Wirth, T.; Frantzeskaki, N.; Loorbach, D. (2020): Urban living labs as inter-boundary spaces for sustainability transitions? In: de Roo, G.; Yamu, C.; Zuidema, C. (Hrsg.): Handbook on Planning and Complexity. Cheltenham, 237–257.

von Wirth, T.; Fuenfschilling, L.; Frantzeskaki, N.; Coenen, L. (2019): Impacts of urban living labs on sustainability transitions: mechanisms and strategies for systemic change through experimentation. In: European Planning Studies 27, 2, 229–257. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2018.1504895

von Wirth, T.; Levin-Keitel, M. (2020): Lokale Nachhaltigkeitsexperimente als raumwirksame Interventionen: Theoretische Grundlagen und Handlungskonzepte. In: GAIA – Ecological Perspectives for Science and Society 29, 2, 98–105. https://doi.org/10.14512/gaia.29.2.7

Voytenko, Y.; McCormick, K.; Evans, J.; Schliwa, G. (2016): Urban living labs for sustainability and low carbon cities in Europe: towards a research agenda. In: Journal of Cleaner Production 123, 45–54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.08.053

Wagner, F.; Miller, E. (2018): The background and history of Real-World Laboratory funding in Baden-Württemberg. In: GAIA – Ecological Perspectives for Science and Society 27, S1, 5. https://doi.org/10.14512/gaia.27.S1.2

Wanner, M.; Stelzer, F. (2019): Reallabore – Perspektiven für ein Forschungsformat im Aufwind. Wuppertal. = in brief 07/2019.

Wolfram, M.; Frantzeskaki, N. (2016): Cities and systemic change for sustainability: prevailing epistemologies and an emerging research agenda. In: Sustainability 8, 2, 144.

Published

Issue publication date 2021-08-31 (version 2)
Published online first 2021-08-09 (version 1)

Versions

Issue

Section

Research Article

How to Cite

1.
Kern K, Haupt W. From Real-World Labs to Urban Experiments: German and International Debates . RuR [Internet]. 2021 Aug. 31 [cited 2024 Jul. 15];79(4):322-35. Available from: https://rur.oekom.de/index.php/rur/article/view/48

Share