Transforming Spatial Planning Through Including Ecosystem Services? Experiences from Selected Research Projects

Authors

  • Rieke Hansen Hochschule Geisenheim University
  • Alexandra Dehnhardt Institut für ökologische Wirtschaftsforschung (IÖW) GmbH https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1371-7142
  • Stefan Marzelli ifuplan Institut für Umweltplanung und Raumentwicklung

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.14512/rur.58

Keywords:

Ecosystem services, Transformation, Governance, Transdisciplinarity, Stakeholder, Biodiversity

Abstract

To counteract the effects of climate change and biodiversity loss, sustainable transformations of societal systems and processes, as well as spatial planning, are required. Ecosystem services are considered as a concept that could transform the management of natural resources towards more sustainability. On the basis of six application-oriented research projects, this paper analyses the extent to which transformation has played a role in planning-related research on ecosystem services so far and what potential experts see for contributing to transformative change in the context of spatial planning by means of ecosystem services. The current research projects on ecosystem services predominantly do not directly refer to transformative processes and strive for changes within the existing planning framework. However, if research would be designed accordingly, it would be possible to contribute to transformative processes. Among other things, the concept of ecosystem services can be used to promote system thinking, cross sectorial boundaries, or involve civic stakeholders to a greater extent. Experiments in research could be the basis for transforming the planning system starting at the niche level.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Abson, D. J.; von Wehrden, H.; Baumgärtner, S.; Fischer, J.; Hanspach, J.; Härdtle, W.; Heinrichs, H.; Klein, A. M.; Lang, D. J.; Martens, P.; Walmsley, D. (2014): Ecosystem services as a boundary object for sustainability. In: Ecological Economics 103, 29–37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2014.04.012

Albert, C.; Hansen, R.; Dehnhardt, A.; Deppisch, S.; Fürst, C.; Geißler, G.; Gerner, N.; Marzelli, S.; Poßer, C.; Rathmann, J.; Schrapp, L.; Schröter-Schlaack, C.; Warner, B. (2021): Das Ökosystemleistungskonzept in der räumlichen Planung – zehn Thesen. In: Raumforschung und Raumordnung | Spatial Research and Planning. https://doi.org/10.14512/rur.76

ARL – Akademie für Raumentwicklung in der Leibniz-Gemeinschaft (2021): Der Beitrag nachhaltiger Raumentwicklung zur Großen Transformation. Impulse für neue Strategien. Hannover. = Positionspapier aus der ARL 121.

Avelino, F.; Dumitru, A.; Cipolla, C.; Kunze, I.; Wittmayer, J. (2020): Translocal empowerment in transformative social innovation networks. In: European Planning Studies 28, 5, 955–977. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2019.1578339

Danielzyk, R.; Sondermann, M. (2018): Informelle Planung. In: ARL – Akademie für Raumforschung und Landesplanung (Hrsg.): Handwörterbuch der Stadt- und Raumentwicklung. Hannover, 963–974.

Díaz, S.; Settele, J.; Brondízio, E. S.; Ngo, H. T.; Agard, J.; Arneth, A.; Balvanera, P.; Brauman, K. A.; Butchart, S. H. M.; Chan, K. M. A.; Garibaldi, L. A.; Ichii, K.; Liu, J.; Subramanian, S. M.; Midgley, G. F.; Miloslavich, P.; Molnár, Z.; Obura, D.; Pfaff, A.; Polasky, S.; Purvis, A.; Razzaque, J.; Reyers, B.; Chowdhury, R. R.; Shin, Y.-J.; Visseren-Hamakers, I.; Willis, K. J.; Zayas, C. N. (2019): Pervasive human-driven decline of life on Earth points to the need for transformative change. In: Science 366, 6471, 1–Seite. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aax3100

Dorninger, C.; Abson, D. J.; Apetrei, C. I.; Derwort, P.; Ives, C. D.; Klaniecki, K.; Lam, D. P.; Langsenlehner, M.; Riechers, M.; Spittler, N.; von Wehrden, H. (2020): Leverage points for sustainability transformation: a review on interventions in food and energy systems. In: Ecological Economics 171, 106570. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2019.106570

Dürbeck, G. (2018): Narrative des Anthropozän – Systematisierung eines interdisziplinären Diskurses. In: Kulturwissenschaftliche Zeitschrift 3, 1, 1–20. https://doi.org/10.2478/kwg-2018-0001

Fritz, L.; Meinherz, F. (2020): Tracing power in transdisciplinary sustainability research: an exploration. In: GAIA – Ecological Perspectives for Science and Society 29, 1, 41–51. https://doi.org/10.14512/gaia.29.1.9

Geels, F. W. (2005): Processes and patterns in transitions and system innovations: Refining the co-evolutionary multi-level perspective. In: Technological Forecasting and Social Change 72, 6, 681–696. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2004.08.014

Hansjürgens, B.; Brenck, M.; Bartz, R.; Kowarik, I. (2018): The TEEB Approach towards Sustainable Urban Transformations: Demonstrating and Capturing Ecosystem Service Values. In: Kabisch, S.; Koch, F.; Gawel, E.; Haase, A.; Knapp, S.; Krellenberg, K.; Nivala, J.; Zehnsdorf, A. (Hrsg.): Urban Transformations. Sustainable Urban Development through Resource Efficiency, Quality of Life and Resilience. Cham, 117–132. = Future City 10. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-59324-1_7

Haxeltine, A.; Pel, B.; Wittmayer, J.; Dumitru, A.; Kemp, R.; Avelino, F. (2017): Building a middle-range theory of Transformative Social Innovation; theoretical pitfalls and methodological responses. In: European Public and Social Innovation Review 2, 1, 59–77. https://doi.org/10.31637/epsir.17-1.5

Hölscher, K.; Frantzeskaki, N.; McPhearson, T.; Loorbach, D. (2019): Tales of transforming cities: Transformative climate governance capacities in New York City, U.S. and Rotterdam, Netherlands. In: Journal of Environmental Management 231, 843–857. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2018.10.043

Hölscher, K.; Wittmayer, J. M.; Loorbach, D. (2018): Transition versus transformation: What’s the difference? In: Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions 27, 1–3. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eist.2017.10.007

IPBES – Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services (2019): Summary for policymakers of the global assessment report on biodiversity and ecosystem services. Bonn. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3831673

Jahn, T.; Keil, F.; Marg, O. (2019): Transdisziplinarität: zwischen Praxis und Theorie. In: GAIA – Ecological Perspectives for Science and Society 28, 1, 16–20. https://doi.org/10.14512/gaia.28.1.6

Kanning, H.; Richter-Harm, B.; Scurrell, B.; Yildiz, Ö. (2021): Real-World Laboratories Initiated by Practitioner Stakeholders for Sustainable Land Management – Characteristics and Challenges Using the Example of Energieavantgarde Anhalt. In: Weith, T.; Barkmann, T.; Gaasch, N.; Rogga, S.; Strauß, C.; Zscheischler, J. (Hrsg.): Sustainable Land Management in a European Context. Cham, 207–226. = Human-Environment Interactions 8. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-50841-8_11

Köhler, J.; Geels, F. W.; Kern, F.; Markard, J.; Onsongo, E.; Wieczorek, A.; Alkemade, F.; Avelino, F.; Bergek, A.; Boons, F.; Fünfschilling, L.; Hess, D.; Holtz, G.; Hyysalo, S.; Jenkins, K.; Kivimaa, P.; Martiskainen, M.; McMeekin, A.; Mühlemeier, M. S.; Nykvist, B.; Pel, B.; Raven, R.; Rohracher, H.; Sandén, B.; Schot, J.; Sovacool, B.; Turnheim, B.; Welch, D.; Wells, P. (2019): An agenda for sustainability transitions research: State of the art and future directions. In: Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions 31, 1–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eist.2019.01.004

Kühne, O.; Duttmann, R. (2020): Recent Challenges of the Ecosystems Services Approach from an Interdisciplinary Point of View. In: Raumforschung und Raumordnung | Spatial Research and Planning 78, 2, 171–184. https://doi.org/10.2478/rara-2019-0055

Lam, D. P. M.; Hinz, E.; Lang, D. J.; Tengö, M.; von Wehrden, H.; Martín-López, B. (2020): Indigenous and local knowledge in sustainability transformations research: a literature review. In: Ecology and Society 25, 1, 3. https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-11305-250103

Langemeyer, J.; Connolly, J. J. T. (2020): Weaving notions of justice into urban ecosystem services research and practice. In: Environmental Science and Policy 109, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2020.03.021

Levin-Keitel, M.; Othengrafen, F.; Behrend, L. (2019): Stadtplanung als Disziplin. Alltag und Selbstverständnis von Planerinnen und Planern. In: Raumforschung und Raumordnung | Spatial Research and Planning 77, 2, 115–130. https://doi.org/10.2478/rara-2019-0018

Luederitz, C.; Schäpke, N.; Wiek, A.; Lang, D. J.; Bergmann, M.; Bos, J. J.; Burch, S.; Davies, A.; Evans, J.; König, A.; Farrelly, M.A.; Forrest, N.; Frantzeskaki, N.; Gibson, R. B.; Kay, B.; Loorbach, D.; McCormick, K.; Parodi, O.; Rauschmayer, F.; Schneidewind, U.; Stauffacher, M.; Stelzer, F.; Trencher, G.; Venjakob, J.; Vergragt, P.J.; von Wehrden, H.; Westley, F. R. (2017): Learning through evaluation – A tentative evaluative scheme for sustainability transition experiments. In: Journal of Cleaner Production 169, 61–76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.09.005

Naturkapital Deutschland – TEEB DE (2012): Der Wert der Natur für Wirtschaft und Gesellschaft. Eine Einführung. München.

Norgaard, R. B. (2010): Ecosystem services: From eye-opening metaphor to complexity blinder. In: Ecological Economics 69, 6, 1219–1227. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2009.11.009

Rau, A.-L.; Bickel, M.W.; Rathgens, J.; Schroth, T. N.; Weiser, A.; Hilser, S.; Jenkins, S.; McCrory, G.; Pfefferle, N.; Roitsch, D.; Stålhammar, S.; Villada, D.; Wamsler, C.; Krause, T.; von Wehrden, H. (2018): Linking concepts of change and ecosystem services research: A systematic review. In: Change and Adaptation in Socio-Ecological Systems 4, 1, 33–45. https://doi.org/10.1515/cass-2018-0004

Renn, O. (2019): Die Rolle(n) transdisziplinärer Wissenschaft bei konfliktgeladenen Transformationsprozessen. In: GAIA – Ecological Perspectives for Science and Society 28, 1, 44–51. https://doi.org/10.14512/gaia.28.1.11

Schulz, H.-D.; Warner, B. (2021): Zur (Neu‑)Ausrichtung der Raumentwicklung für eine auf Nachhaltigkeit zielende Transformation. In: Hofmeister, S.; Warner, B.; Ott, Z. (Hrsg.): Nachhaltige Raumentwicklung für die große Transformation. Herausforderungen, Barrieren und Perspektiven für Raumwissenschaften und Raumplanung. Hannover, 45–75. = Forschungsberichte der ARL 15.

Spyra, M.; Kleemann, J.; Cetin, N. I.; Vázquez Navarrete, C. J.; Albert, C.; Palacios-Agundez, I.; Ametzaga-Arregi, I.; La Rosa, D.; Rozas-Vásquez, D.; Adem Esmail, B.; Picchi, P.; Geneletti, D.; König, H. J.; Koo, H.; Kopperoinen, L.; Fürst, C. (2019): The ecosystem services concept: a new Esperanto to facilitate participatory planning processes? In: Landscape Ecology 34, 7, 1715–1735. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-018-0745-6

Szücs, L.; Garschhammer, J.; Meyer, C.; Reinke, M.; Blum, P. (2019): Integration von Ökosystemleistungen in die kommunale und regionale Landschaftsplanung. Mehrwert und Erkenntnisgewinn für die Planungspraxis. In: Naturschutz und Landschaftsplanung 51, 11, 530–537.

TEEB – The Economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity (2010): The economics of ecosystems and biodiversity. Ecological and economic foundations. London.

van den Belt, M.; Stevens, S. M. (2016): Transformative agenda, or lost in the translation? A review of top-cited articles in the first four years of Ecosystem Services. In: Ecosystem Services 22, A, 60–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2016.09.006

Wamsler, C.; Raggers, S. (2018): Principles for supporting city-citizen commoning for climate adaptation: From adaptation governance to sustainable transformation. In: Environmental Science and Policy 85, 81–89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2018.03.021

WBGU – Wissenschaftlicher Beirat der Bundesregierung Globale Umweltveränderungen (2011): Welt im Wandel. Gesellschaftsvertrag für eine Große Transformation. Berlin.

WBGU – Wissenschaftlicher Beirat der Bundesregierung Globale Umweltveränderungen (2016): Der Umzug der Menschheit. Die transformative Kraft der Städte. Berlin.

WBGU – Wissenschaftlicher Beirat der Bundesregierung Globale Umweltveränderungen (2020): Landwende im Anthropozän: Von der Konkurrenz zur Integration. Berlin.

Wittmer, H.; Gundimeda, H. (2012): The economics of ecosystems and biodiversity in local and regional policy and management. London.

Wolfram, M. (2016): Conceptualizing urban transformative capacity: A framework for research and policy. In: Cities 51, 121–130. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2015.11.011

Wolfram, M.; Borgström, S.; Farrelly, M. (2019): Urban transformative capacity: From concept to practice. In: Ambio. A Journal of Environment and Society 48, 5, 437–448. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-019-01169-y

Zscheischler, J. (2021): Transdisciplinary Research in Land Use Science – Developments, Criticism and Empirical Findings from Research Practice. In: Weith, T.; Barkmann, T.; Gaasch, N.; Rogga, S.; Strauß, C.; Zscheischler, J. (Hrsg.): Sustainable Land Management in a European Context. Cham, 127–143. = Human-Environment Interactions 8. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-50841-8_7

Zscheischler, J.; Rogga, S. (2021): Innovations for Sustainable Land Management – A Comparative Case Study. In: Weith, T.; Barkmann, T.; Gaasch, N.; Rogga, S.; Strauß, C.; Zscheischler, J. (Hrsg.): Sustainable Land Management in a European Context. Cham, 145–164. = Human-Environment Interactions 8. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-50841-8_8

Published

Issue publication date 2022-02-28 (version 2)
Published online first 2021-12-16 (version 1)

Versions

Issue

Section

Policy and practice perspective

How to Cite

1.
Hansen R, Dehnhardt A, Marzelli S. Transforming Spatial Planning Through Including Ecosystem Services? Experiences from Selected Research Projects. RuR [Internet]. 2022 Feb. 28 [cited 2024 May 25];80(1):112-27. Available from: https://rur.oekom.de/index.php/rur/article/view/58

Most read articles by the same author(s)