Metropolregionen, Wissensregion und Governance

Dietrich Fürst

doi:10.1007/BF03183158

Authors

Dietrich Fürst Westermannweg 35, 30419, Hannover

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03183158

Keywords:

Metropolitan region, Knowledge region, Regional governance, Innovative systems, Co-ordination

Abstract

Lead question of the contribution is whether and how metropolitan regions are able to resolve the tension between territorially oriented and functionally oriented modes of governance resulting from combining metropolitan regions with the concept of “knowledge regions”. The discussion centers on what does the notion “metropolitan region” convey, which are the requirements put foreward by “knowledge regions”, what conflicts may surge between territorial and functional governance and how do the German metropolitan regions tend to handle those tensions.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Akademie für Raumforschung und Landesplanung — ARL — et al. (2007): Ergebnisse des gemeinsamen Arbeitskreises „Metropolregionen — Innovation, Wettbewerb, Handlungsfähigkeit”. Hamburg, Juni 2007 (verv. Manuskript).

Benz, A. (2007): Multilevel Governance. In: Benz, A.; Lütz, S.; Schimank, U.; Simonis, G. (Hrsg.): Handbuch Governance. Theoretische Grundlagen und empirische Anwendungsfelder. Wiesbaden, S. 339–352.

Blotevogel, H.H. (2005): Metropolregionen. In: ARL (Hrsg.): Handwörterbuch der Raumordnung. 4. Aufl., Hannover, S. 642–647.

Brake, K. (2007): „Gleichwertigkeit der Lebensverhältnisse” und Wirkungskräfte der Raumstrukturierung. In: Raumforschung und Raumordnung 65, 3, S. 175–185.

Capello, R.; Faggian, A. (2005): Collective learning and relational capital in local innovation processes. In: Regional Studies 39, S. 75–87.

Cooke, P. (1997): To construct regional advantage from innovation systems first build policy platforms. In: European Planning Studies 15, S. 179–194.

Florida, R. (2005): Cities and the creative class and how it’s transforming work, leisure, community and everyday life. New York.

Florida, R. (2003): Gay-tolerant societies prosper economically. In: USA Today vom 1. Mai 2003, S. A13.

Florida, R. (2002): The rise of the creative class. New York.

Fromhold-Eisebith, M. (2007): Bridging scales in innovation policies: How to link regional, national and international innovation systems. In: European Regional Studies 15, S. 217–233.

Fürst, D. (2007): Regional Governance. In: Benz, A.; Lütz, S.; Schimank, U.; Simonis, G. (Hrsg.): Handbuch Governance. Theoretische Grundlagen und empirische Anwendungsfelder. Wiesbaden, S. 353–365.

Fürst, D. (2003): Paradigmatische Steuerung in der Regionalplanung. In: Fürst, D.; Löb, S.; Rudolph, A.; Zimmermann, K.: Steuerung durch Regionalplanung. Baden-Baden, S. 125–142.

Grabher, G. (2004): Die Nachbarschaft, die Stadt und der Club: Wissensmilieus in Projektökologien. In: Matthiessen, U. (Hrsg.): Stadtregion und Wissen. Wiesbaden, S. 279–92.

Granovetter, M. (1973): The strength of weak ties. In: American Journal of Sociology 78, S. 1360–1380.

Growe, A.; Löwis, S. von; Torns, F. (2007): Wissensstädte und-regionen — eine Einführung. In: Bieker, S. et al. (Hrsg.): Räumliche Planung im Wandel — Welche Instrumente haben Zukunft? Hannover.=ARL-Arbeitsmaterialien, Heft 338, S. 42–54.

Harding, A. (2007): Taking city regions seriously? Response to debate on “city-regions”: New geographies of governance, democracy and social reproduction. In: International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 31, S. 443–458.

Hauser, C.; Tappeiner, G.; Walde, J. (2007): The learning region: The impact of social capital and weak ties on innovation. In: Regional Studies 41, S. 75–88.

Howells, J.R.L. (2002): Tacit knowledge, innovation and economic geography. In: Urban Studies 39, S. 871–884.

Ibert, O. (2007): Towards a geography of knowledge creation: The ambivalence between “knowledge as an object” and “knowing in practice”. In: Regional Studies 41, S. 103–114.

Keating, M. (1998): The new regionalism in Western Europe. Cheltenham/U.K.

Knapp, W.; Schmitt, P.; Danielzyk, R. (2006): Rhine-Ruhr: Towards compatibility? Strategic spatial policies for a specific configuration of polycentricity. In: Built Environment 32, S. 137–147.

Koschatzky, K.; Kroll, H. (2007): Which side of the coin? The regional governance of science and innovation. In: Regional Studies 41, S. 1115–1127.

Krätke, S. (2007): Metropolisation of the European economic territory as a consequence of increasing specialisation of urban agglomerations on the knowledge economy. In: European Planning Studies 15, S. 1–28.

Kröcher, U.; Henking, R. (2007): Innovationsentwicklung in ländlichen Räumen — alternative Innovations- und Vernetzungsstrategie kommunaler Wirtschaftsförderung. In: Neues Archiv für Niedersachsen, 2, S. 18–35.

Krugman, P.R. (1991): Increasing returns and economic geography. In: Journal of Political Economy 99, S. 483–499.

Kübler, D.; Piliutyte, J. (2007): Intergovernmental relations and international urban strategies: constraints and opportunities in multilevel politics. In: Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy 25, S. 357–373.

Lagendijk, A.; Lorentzen, A. (2007): Proximity, knowledge and innovation in peripheral regions. On the intersection between geographical and organizational proximity. In: European Planning Studies 15, S. 457–466.

Leber, N.; Kunzmann, K.R. (2006): Entwicklungsperspektiven ländlicher Räume in Zeiten des Metropolenfiebers. In: DISP 42, 166, S. 58–70.

Lefèvre, C.; d’Albergogo, E. (2007): Guest editorial — why cities are looking abroad and how they go about it. In: Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy 25, S. 317–326.

Martins, L.; Rodriguez-Alvarez, J.M. (2007): Towards glocal leadership: taking up the challenge of new local governance in Europe? In: Environment and Planning C: Governance and Policy 25, S. 391–409.

Nowotny, H.; Gibbons, M.; Scott, P. (2001): Rethinking science: Knowledge and the public in the age of uncertainty. Cambridge.

Porter, M.E. (1990): The competitive advantage of nations. London.

Porter, M.E. (2000): Location, competition and economic development. In: Economic Development Quarterly 14, S. 23–32.

Sassen, S. (1991): The global city. Princeton/N.J.

Sassen, S. (2001): Global cities and global city-regions: a comparison. In: Scott, A.J.: Global city-regions. Trends, theory, policy. Oxford, New York, S. 78–95.

Scharpf, F.W. (2000): Interaktionsformen. Akteurzentrierter Institutionalismus in der Politikforschung. Opladen.

Scott, A.J.; Storper, M. (2003): Regions, globalization, development. In: Regional Studies 37, S. 579–593.

Smith, H.L. (2007): Universities, innovation, and territorial development: a review of the evidence. In: Environment and Planning C: Governance and Policy 25, S. 98–114.

Van Winden, W.; van den Berg, L.; Pol, P. (2007): European cities in the knowledge economy: Towards a typology. In: Urban Studies 44, S. 525–549.

Wiechmann, T.; Löwis, S. von; Kaether, J. (Hrsg.) (2004): Das Modellvorhaben „Regionen der Zukunft” Erfahrungen und Schlussfolgerungen für eine nachhaltige Regionalentwicklung in Deutschland. Dresden. = IÖR-Schriften, Bd. 45.