Large urban development projects in company towns. The cases of Erlangen (Siemens) and Basel (Novartis)

Dominik Bertram; Tobias Chilla; Marc Pfister

doi:10.14512/rur.2967

Authors

Dominik Bertram Institut für Geographie, Friedrich-Alexander- Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg
Tobias Chilla Institut für Geographie, Friedrich-Alexander- Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg
Marc Pfister Bau- und Verkehrsdepartement, Kanton Basel-Stadt

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.14512/rur.2967

Keywords:

Large-scale urban development projects, Public space, Urban campus, Newspaper analysis, Erlangen , Basel

Abstract

The literature on large-scale urban development projects often primarily addresses drastic failures and their underlying causes. Recently, however, success factors have also received increasing attention. From both perspectives, management approaches, participation logics and political strategies are prominent topics in this context. However, the symbolic dimension of large urban development projects is rarely considered. This is somewhat surprising, as symbolic meaning is considered key to urban development in many contexts. We explore this dimension with two cases of urban entrepreneurial development projects, the Novartis Campus in Basel (Switzerland) and the Siemens Campus in Erlangen (Germany). Our empirical study relies on thematic press analyses. We reflect on the postulate that a “fit” between urban symbolism and societal expectations is a crucial determinant of smooth implementation in large-scale urban development projects in company towns. In both case studies, urban integration, architecture and design are of great relevance. These “soft” factors in planning and implementation suggest that the outcomes are not solely dependent on technical professionalism. Instead, the appropriate symbolism within the urban context and the associated project investment emerge as critical factors.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Abdallah, S.B.; El-Boukri, S.; Floricel, S.; Hudon, P.-A.; Brunet, M.; Petit, M.-C.; Aubry, M. (2022): A process-oriented framework to measure development performance and success of megaprojects. In: International Journal of Project Management 40, 6, 685–702. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2022.06.005

Adam, B.; Fuchs, J. (2012): Projekte in der Stadtentwicklung – Eigenschaften und Handlungsempfehlungen. In: Informationen zur Raumentwicklung 11/12, 563–574.

Agrawal, A.; Cockburn, I.; Rosell, C. (2010). Not invented here? Innovation in company towns. In: Journal of Urban Economics 67, 1, 78–89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jue.2009.10.004

Ansar, A.; Flyvbjerg, B.; Budzier, A.; Lunn, D. (2017): Big is fragile: An attempt at theorizing scale. In: Flyvbjerg, B. (ed.): The Oxford Handbook of Megaproject Management. Oxford, 60–95. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198732242.001.0001

Aydoghmish, F.M.; Rafieian, M. (2022): Developing a comprehensive conceptual framework for city branding based on urban planning theory: Meta-synthesis of the literature (1990–2020). In: Cities 128, 103731. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2022.103731

Balke, J.; Reuber, P.; Wood, G. (2018): Iconic architecture and place-specific neoliberal governmentality: Insights from Hamburg’s Elbe Philharmonic Hall. In: Urban Studies 55, 5, 997-1012. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098017694132

Bartlett, L.; Vavrus, F. (2017): Comparative case studies: An innovative approach. In: Nordic Journal of Comparative and International Education 1, 1. https://doi.org/10.7577/njcie.1929

Bauriedl, S. (2007): Spielräume Nachhaltiger Entwicklung: Die Macht stadtentwicklungspolitischer Diskurse. München. = Hochschulschriften zur Nachhaltigkeit 27.

Bauriedl, S. (2009): Impulse der geographischen Raumtheorie für eine raum- und maßstabskritische Diskursforschung. In: Glasze, G.; Mattissek, A. (Hrsg.): Handbuch Diskurs und Raum. Theorien und Methoden für die Humangeographie sowie die sozial- und kulturwissenschaftliche Raumforschung. Bielefeld, 219–231.

Berlemann, M.; Jahn, V. (2016): Regional importance of Mittelstand firms and innovation performance. In: Regional Studies 50, 11, 1819–1833. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2015.1058923

Bodnar, J. (2015): Reclaiming public space. In: Urban Studies 52, 12, 2090–2104. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098015583626

Boyatzis, R.E. (1998): Transforming qualitative information: Thematic analysis and code development. London.

Braun, V.; Clarke, V. (2006): Using thematic analysis in psychology. In: Qualitative Research in Psychology 3, 2, 77–101.

Buchmuller, L.; Keller, D.A.; Koch M.; Schumacher, F.; Selle, K. (2000): Planen Projekte Stadt? Weitere Verständigungen über den Wandel in der Planung. In: disP – The Planning Review 36, 141, 55–59. https://doi.org/10.1080/02513625.2000.10556738

Büttner, K. (2009): Stadtentwicklung durch Großkonzerne – zur Koevolution von Raum und Wissen am Fallbeispiel Siemens und Erlangen. In: Matthiesen, U.; Mahnken, G. (eds.): Das Wissen der Städte. Wiesbaden, 133–146. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-531-91648-4_10

Carmona, M. (2015): Re-theorising contemporary public space: a new narrative and a new normative. In: Journal of Urbanism: International Research on Placemaking and Urban Sustainability 8, 4, 373–405. https://doi.org/10.1080/17549175.2014.909518

Chilla, T.; Heugel, A.; Sielker, F.; Glasze, G. (2020): Monitoring von städtebaulichen Großprojekten. Das Beispiel „Siemens Campus Erlangen“. In: Mitteilungen der Fränkischen Geographischen Gesellschaft 65/66, 63–73.

Commander, S. (2018): One-company towns: Scale and consequences. In: IZA World of Labor. https://doi.org/10.15185/izawol.433%0A

Denicol, J.; Davies, A.; Krystallis, I. (2020): What Are the Causes and Cures of Poor Megaproject Performance? A Systematic Literature Review and Research Agenda. In: Project Management Journal 51, 3, 328-345. https://doi.org/10.1177/8756972819896113

Dick, M.; Degenhardt, B.; Schulze, H.; Wehner, T. (2015): Der Novartis-Campus: Eine Fallstudie zu Produktivität, Wohlbefinden und Authentizität im Multispace-Office. In: Wirtschaftspsychologie 17, 1, 105–116.

Dziomba, M. (2009): Städtebauliche Großprojekte der urbanen Renaissance. Die Phase der Grundstücksverkäufe und ihr Einfluss auf den Projekterfolg. Berlin. = Schriften des Arbeitskreises Stadtzukünfte der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Geographie 7.

Dziomba, M.; Matuschewski, A. (2007): Grossprojekte in der Stadtentwicklung – Konfliktbereiche und Erfolgsfaktoren: Wie lassen sich finanzielle Erfolge, städtebauliche Qualitäten und Nutzungsmischung erreichen? In: disP – The Planning Review 43, 171, 5–11. https://doi.org/10.1080/02513625.2007.10556992

Edvardsson, I.R.; Yigitcanlar, T.; Pancholi, S. (2016): Knowledge city research and practice under the microscope: A review of empirical findings. In: Knowledge Management Research and Practice 14, 4, 537–564. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41275-016-0003-0

Fleury, A.; Gomes, P. (2024): Public space and the metropolis. The changing governance of public spaces around the Grand Paris Express’s new metro stations. In: Urban Geography 45, 1, 93–113. https://doi.org/10.1080/02723638.2022.2149135

Floricel, S.; Brunet, M. (2023): Grandstanding? The elusive process of shaping megaproject symbolism. In: International Journal of Project Management 41, 5, 102498. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2023.102498

Flyvbjerg, B. (2021a): Top Ten Behavioral Biases in Project Management: An Overview. In: Project Management Journal 52, 6, 531–546. https://doi.org/10.1177/87569728211049046

Flyvbjerg, B. (2021b): Make Megaprojects More Modular. In: Harvard Business Review 6, 58–63.

Flyvbjerg, B.; Holm, M.S.; Buhl, S. (2002): Underestimating costs in public works projects: Error or lie? In: Journal of the American Planning Association 68, 3, 279–295. https://doi.org/10.1080/01944360208976273

Gaim, M.; Clegg, S.; Pina e Cunha, M. (2022): In Praise of Paradox Persistence: Evidence from the Sydney Opera House Project. In: Project Management Journal 53, 4, 397–415. https://doi.org/10.1177/87569728221094834

Gibson, K. (1991): Company towns and class processes: a study of the coal towns of Central Queensland. In: Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 9, 3, 285–308. https://doi.org/10.1068/d090285

Gualini, E.; Majoor, S. (2007): Innovative practices in large urban development projects: Conflicting frames in the quest for “new urbanity”. In: Planning Theory and Practice 8, 3, 297–318. https://doi.org/10.1080/14649350701514637

Haab, D.; Luterbach, M.; Heimann, H.-G. (2013): Stadtentwicklung Basel Nord – „Near the Campus“. In: Drilling, M.; Oehler, P. (eds.): Soziale Arbeit und Stadtentwicklung. Wiesbaden, 261–268. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-01946-4_18

Hesse, M. (2013): Das „Kirchberg-Syndrom“: Grosse Projekte im kleinen Land: Bauen und Planen in Luxemburg. In: disP – The Planning Review 49, 1, 14–28. https://doi.org/10.1080/02513625.2013.799854

Huning, S.; Peters, D. (2003): Mega-Projekte und Stadtentwicklung. In: Planungsrundschau 8, 5–14.

Juarez Cornelio, J.R.; Sainati, T.; Locatelli, G. (2021): What does it take to kill a megaproject? The reverse escalation of commitment. In: International Journal of Project Management 39, 7, 774–787. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2021.07.004

Kiese, M. (2016): Clusterentwicklung als regionale Verantwortung: Volkswagen in Wolfsburg. In: Standort. Zeitschrift für Angewandte Geographie 40, 1, 40–45. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00548-016-0411-7

Lee, D.; Scholten, N. (2022): Do welfare states need privately owned public spaces? The relevance of and need for such spaces in German cities. In: Journal of Urban Design 27, 5, 513–527. https://doi.org/10.1080/13574809.2022.2036110

Leick, A.; Hesse, M.; Becker, T. (2020): Vom „Projekt im Projekt“ zur „Stadt in der Stadt“? Probleme der Governance und des Managements großer urbaner Entwicklungsvorhaben am Beispiel der Wissenschaftsstadt Belval, Luxemburg. In: Raumforschung und Raumordnung | Spatial Research and Planning 78, 3, 249–265. https://doi.org/10.2478/rara-2020-0009

Mattissek, A.; Pfaffenbach, C.; Reuber, P. (2013): Methoden der empirischen Humangeographie. Braunschweig.

Moonesirust, E.; Brown, A.D. (2021): Company towns and the governmentality of desired identities. In: Human Relations 74, 4, 502–526. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726719887220

Nagel, M.; Satoh, K. (2019): Protesting iconic megaprojects. A discourse network analysis of the evolution of the conflict over Stuttgart 21. In: Urban Studies 56, 8, 1681–1700. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098018775903

Ninan, J.; Clegg, S.; Mahalingam, A. (2019): Branding and governmentality for infrastructure megaprojects: The role of social media. In: International Journal of Project Management 37, 1, 59–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2018.10.005

Proudfoot, K. (2023): Inductive/deductive hybrid thematic analysis in mixed methods research. In: Journal of Mixed Methods Research 17, 3, 308–326. https://doi.org/10.1177/15586898221126816

Rego, M.L.; Reis Irigaray, H.A.; Chaves, R.L.P. (2017): Symbolic megaprojects: historical evidence of a forgotten dimension. In: Project Management Journal 48, 6, 17–28. https://doi.org/10.1177/875697281704800603

Romme, A.G.L. (2017): Toward the blueprint of campus-based ecosystems for innovation. In: Engineering Management Research 6, 1, 84–89. https://doi.org/10.5539/emr.v6n1p84

Salet, W. (2008): Rethinking urban projects: Experiences in Europe. In: Urban Studies 45, 11, 2343–2363. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098008095871

Sanderson, J. (2012): Risk, uncertainty and governance in megaprojects: A critical discussion of alternative explanations. In: International Journal of Project Management 30, 4, 432–443. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2011.11.002

Tjora, A. (2018). Qualitative research as stepwise deductive induction. Abingdon.

van Marrewijk, A. (2017): The multivocality of symbols: A longitudinal study of the symbolic dimensions of the high-speed train megaproject (1995–2015). In: Project Management Journal 48, 6, 47–59. https://doi.org/10.1177/875697281704800605

Wang, T.; Xu, J.; He, Q.; Chan, A.P.C.; Owusu, E.K. (2023): Studies on the success criteria and critical success factors for mega infrastructure construction projects: a literature review. In: Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management 30, 5, 1809–1834. https://doi.org/10.1108/ECAM-12-2020-1042

Zeković, S.; Maričić, T. (2022): Contemporary governance of urban mega-projects: a case study of the Belgrade waterfront. In: Territory, Politics, Governance 10, 4, 527–548. https://doi.org/10.1080/21622671.2020.1774410

Zoller, F.A.; Boutellier, R. (2013): Design principles for innovative workspaces to increase efficiency in pharmaceutical R&D: lessons learned from the Novartis campus. In: Drug Discovery Today 18, 7‑8, 318–322. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drudis.2012.12.012

Zukin, S. (2011): Reconstructing the authenticity of place. In: Theory and Society 40, 2, 161–165. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11186-010-9133-1