The domestic dimension of cross-border governance: Patterns of coordination and cooperation Authors Tobias Chilla University of Erlangen-Nürnberg DOI: https://doi.org/10.14512/rur.212 Keywords: Governance, networks, border regions, cooperation, coordination Abstract Contemporary debates in border studies tend to see the national level as a rather residual category. There are, however, strong arguments that the national level still plays an important role for the governance of border regions. The question is what kind of formats are in place related to coordination and networking of border regions within national settings. The aim of this paper is to provide an exploratory typology of domestic governance settings. The underlying empirical study shows a large diversity of governance patterns in thirteen European countries. A synthetic typology reveals five approaches, namely centralist, decentral and selective coordination as well as transnational and laisser-faire approaches. On this basis, the explanatory factors of the revealed governance patterns are discussed. The state structure (federal, centralist) plays an important role. Moreover, contingent political strategies, embedded in political culture and path dependency, help to understand the differences and the similarities between the analysed countries. The domestic governance dimension seems to bridge the frictions between the rather classical inner-state hierarchies and the soft networking tools of cross-border governance in the strict sense. Downloads Download data is not yet available. References Agnew, V. (2008): Borders on the mind: re-framing border thinking. In: Ethics and Global Politics 1, 4, 175–191. https://doi.org/10.3402/egp.v1i4.1892 Allmendinger, P.; Chilla, T.; Sielker, F. (2014): Europeanizing territoriality – Towards soft spaces? In: Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space 46, 11, 2703–2717. https://doi.org/10.1068/a130037p Balogh, P.; Pete, M. (2018): Bridging the Gap: Cross-border Integration in the Slovak-Hungarian Borderland around Štúrovo-Esztergom. In: Journal of Borderlands Studies 33, 4, 605–622. https://doi.org/10.1080/08865655.2017.1294495 Beck, J. (2019): Cross-border cooperation in Europe as an object in transdisciplinary research. In: Beck J. (ed.): Transdisciplinary discourses on cross-border cooperation in Europe. Frankfurt am Main, 13–27. Belkacem, R.; Pigeron-Piroth, I. (2020): Socioeconomic profiles of cross-border commuters at the French borders: common features and territorial specificities. In: Borders in Perspective 3, 8–22. https://doi.org/10.25353/ubtr-xxxx-d64d-92a8 Benz, A.; Eberlein, B. (1999): The Europeanization of regional policies: patterns of multi-level governance. In: Journal of European Public Policy 6, 2, 329–348. https://doi.org/10.1080/135017699343748 Berzi, M. (2017): The cross-border reterritorialization concept revisited: the territorialist approach applied to the case of Cerdanya on the French-Spanish border. In: European Planning Studies 25, 9, 1575–1596. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2017.1321622 Bürkner, H.-J. (2019): Scaling and Bordering: An Elusive Relationship? In: Journal of Borderlands Studies 34, 1, 71–87. https://doi.org/10.1080/08865655.2017.1300926 Callanan, M.; Tatham, M. (2014): Territorial interest representation in the European Union: actors, objectives and strategies. Journal of European Public Policy 21, 2, 188–210. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2013.829579 Chilla, T. (2020): Innerstaatliche Vernetzung von Grenzregionen. Studie im Auftrag des Bundesministeriums des Inneren, für Bau und Heimat. Berlin. Chilla, T.; Evrard, E.; Schulz, C. (2012): On the Territoriality of Cross-Border Cooperation. “Institutional Mapping” in a Multi-Level Context. In: European Planning Studies 20, 6, 961–980. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2012.673563 Chilla, T.; Lambracht, L. (2022): Institutional mapping of cross-border cooperation. INTERREG programme analyses with KEEP data. In: European Planning Studies. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2022.2058321 Colomb, C. (2018): A European Perspective on Anglo-Scottish Cross-border Cooperation: Lessons from EU-funded Territorial Cooperation Programs. In: Journal of Borderlands Studies 33, 1, 103–122. https://doi.org/10.1080/08865655.2016.1267585 Coman, R. (2019): Values and Power Conflicts in Framing Borders and Borderlands: The 2013 Reform of EU Schengen Governance. In: Journal of Borderlands Studies 34, 5, 685–698. https://doi.org/10.1080/08865655.2017.1402201 Döringer, S. (2021): “The problem-centred expert interview”. Combining qualitative interviewing approaches for investigating implicit expert knowledge. In: International Journal of Social Research Methodology 24, 3, 265–278. https://doi.org/10.1080/13645579.2020.1766777 European Commission (2018): Proposal for a regulation on a mechanism to resolve legal and administrative obstacles in cross-border context. Strasbourg. = COM (2018) 373 final. Evrard, E.; Engl, A. (2018): Taking Stock of the European Grouping of Territorial Cooperation (EGTC): From Policy Formulation to Policy Implementation. In: Medeiros, E. (ed.): European Territorial Cooperation. Cham, 209–227. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-74887-0_11 Frątczak-Müller, J.; Mielczarek-Żejmo, A. (2020): Networks of cross-border cooperation in Europe – the interests and values. The case of Spree-Neisse-Bober Euroregion In: European Planning Studies 28, 1, 8–34. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2019.1623972 Fricke, C. (2015): Spatial Governance across Borders Revisited: Organizational Forms and Spatial Planning in Metropolitan Cross-border Regions. In: European Planning Studies 23, 5, 849–870. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2014.887661 Guillermo Ramírez, M. (2018): Institutionalisation of cross-border cooperation: The role of the Association of European Border Regions. In: Havlícek, T.; Jerábek, M.; Dokoupil, J. (eds.): Borders in Central Europe after the Schengen Agreement. Cham, 93–102. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-63016-8_6 Harguindéguy, J.B.; Bray, Z. (2009): Does cross-border cooperation empower European regions? The case of Interreg III‑A France-Spain. In: Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy 27, 4, 747–760. https://doi.org/10.1068/c08119 Harrison, J. (2013): Configuring the new ‘regional world’: On being caught between territory and networks. In: Regional Studies 47, 1, 55–74. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2011.644239 Harrison, J.; Growe, A. (2014): From places to flows? Planning for the new ‘regional world’ in Germany. In: European Urban and Regional Studies 21, 1, 21–41. https://doi.org/10.1177/0969776412441191 Hooghe, L.; Marks, G. (2001): Types of Multi-Level Governance. In: European Integration online Papers 5, 11, 1–24 Hörnström, L.; Smed Olsen, L.; van Well, L. (2012): Added Value of Cross-Border and Transnational Cooperation in Nordic Regions. Stockholm. = Nordregio Working Paper 2012:14. Hörnström, L.; Tepecik Diş, A. (2013): Crossing Borders. Linkages between EU policy for territorial cooperation and Nordic cross-border cooperation. Stockholm. = Nordregio Working Paper 2013:2. Huggins, C. (2018): Subnational Government and Transnational Networking: The Rationalist Logic of Local Level Europeanization. In: Journal of Common Market Studies 56, 6, 1263–1282. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcms.12740. Jauhiainen, J. (2002): Territoriality and topocracy of cross-border networks. In: Journal of Baltic Studies 33, 2, 156–176. https://doi.org/10.1080/01629770200000031 Johnson, C.; Jones, R.; Paasi, A.; Amoore, L.; Mountz, A.; Salter, M.; Rumford, C. (2011) Interventions on rethinking ‘the border’ in border studies. In: Political Geography 30, 2, 61–69. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polgeo.2011.01.002 Kaucic, J.; Sohn, C. (2021): Mapping the cross-border cooperation ‘galaxy’: an exploration of scalar arrangements in Europe. In: European Planning Studies. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2021.1923667 Klatt, M.; Wassenberg, B. (2017): Secondary foreign policy: Can local and regional cross-border cooperation function as a tool for peace-building and reconciliation? In: Regional and Federal Studies 27, 3, 205–218. https://doi.org/10.1080/13597566.2017.1350652 Knieling, J.; Othengrafen, F. (2009): En route to a theoretical model for comparative research on planning cultures. In: Knieling, J.; Othengrafen, F. (eds.): Planning cultures in Europe. Decoding Cultural phenomena in urban and regional planning. London, 39–62. Lambertz, K.-H. (2010): Die Grenzregionen als Labor und Motor kontinentaler Entwicklungen in Europa. Baden-Baden. = Schriftenreihe zur Grenzüberschreitenden Zusammenarbeit 4. MacKinnon, D. (2011): Reconstructing Scale: Towards a New Scalar Politics. In: Progress in Human Geography 35, 1, 21–36. https://doi.org/10.1177/0309132510367841 Mayring, P. (2014): Qualitative content analysis: theoretical foundation, basic procedures and software solutions. Klagenfurt. Medeiros, E. (2018): The Role of European Territorial Cooperation (ETC) in EU Cohesion Policy. In: Medeiros, E. (ed.): European Territorial Cooperation. Cham, 69–93. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-74887-0_5 MOT – Mission Opérationelle Transfrontalière (2018): Les territoires transfrontaliers: La fabrique de l’Europe. Paris. Moyson, S.; Scholten, P.; Weible, C.M. (2017): Policy learning and policy change: theorizing their relations from different perspectives. In: Policy and Society 36, 2, 161–177. https://doi.org/10.1080/14494035.2017.1331879 Nienaber, B.; Wille, C. (2020): Cross-border cooperation in Europe: a relational perspective. In: European Planning Studies 28, 1, 1–7, https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2019.1623971 Noferini, A.; Berzi, M.; Camonita, F.; Durà, A. (2020): Cross-border cooperation in the EU: Euroregions amid multilevel governance and re-territorialization. In: European Planning Studies 28, 1, 35–56. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2019.1623973 Opiłowska, E. (2017): Reconciliation through Europeanization: Secondary foreign policy in the German-Polish borderlands. In: Regional and Federal Studies 27, 3, 283–304, https://doi.org/10.1080/13597566.2017.1343719 Opiłowska, E. (2021): The Covid-19 crisis: The end of a borderless Europe? In: European Societies 23, sup 1, S589–S600. https://doi.org/10.1080/14616696.2020.1833065 Paasi, A. (1999): Boundaries as social practice and discourse: The Finnish-Russian border. In: Regional Studies 33, 7, 669–680. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343409950078701 Perkmann, M. (2007): Policy Entrepreneurship and Multilevel Governance: A Comparative Study of European Cross-Border Regions. In: Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy 25, 6, 861–879. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1068/c60m Peyrony, J.; Denert, O. (2012): Planning for Cross-Border Territories: The Role Played by Spatial Information. In: Raumforschung und Raumordnung 70, 3, 229–240. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13147-012-0156-0 Plangger, M. (2019): Exploring the role of territorial actors in cross-border regions. In: Territory, Politics, Governance 7, 2, 156–176. https://doi.org/10.1080/21622671.2017.1336938 Pupier, P. (2020): Spatial evolution of cross-border regions. Contrasted case studies in North-West Europe. In: European Planning Studies 28, 1, 81–104. https://www.doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2019.1623975 Rubinson, C. (2019): Presenting qualitative comparative analysis: Notation, tabular layout, and visualization. In: Methodological Innovations 12, 2, 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1177/2059799119862110 Sielker, F. (2018): The European Commission’s proposal for a cross-border mechanism (ECBM): Potential implications and perspectives. In: Journal of Property, Planning and Environmental Law 10, 3, 219–239. https://doi.org/10.1108/JPPEL-08-2018-0024 Sohn, C.; Reitel, B. (2016): The role of national states in the construction of cross-border metropolitan regions in Europe: A scalar approach. In: European Urban and Regional Studies 23, 3, 306–321. https://doi.org/10.1177/0969776413512138 Svensson, S. (2017): Health policy in cross-border cooperation practices: The role of Euroregions and their local government members. In: Territory, Politics, Governance 5, 1, 47–64. https://doi.org/10.1080/21622671.2015.1114962 Verschelde, N. (2019): When border regions have wind in their sails – a short history of the European Commission’s communication ‘Boosting growth and cohesion in EU Border Regions’. In: Beck J. (ed.): Transdisciplinary discourses on cross-border cooperation in Europe. Frankfurt am Main, 395–401. Zumbusch, K.; Scherer, R. (2015): Cross-Border Governance: Balancing Formalized and Less Formalized Co-Operations. In: Social Sciences 4, 3, 499–519. https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci4030499 Downloads PDF HTML XML Published Issue publication date 2023-04-28 (version 2)Published online first 2022-11-02 (version 1) Versions 2023-04-28 (2) 2022-11-02 (1) Issue Vol. 81 No. 2 (2023) Section Research Article License Copyright (c) 2022 Tobias Chilla This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. Articles in Raumforschung und Raumordnung – Spatial Research and Planning are published under a Creative Commons license. From Vol. 79 No. 2 (2021), the license applied is CC BY 4.0. From Vol. 77 No. 1 to Vol. 79 No.1, articles were published under a CC BY-SA license. Earlier volumes have been re-published by oekom 2022 under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License CC BY 4.0. How to Cite 1.Chilla T. The domestic dimension of cross-border governance: Patterns of coordination and cooperation. RuR [Internet]. 2023 Apr. 28 [cited 2024 Oct. 3];81(2):140-53. Available from: https://rur.oekom.de/index.php/rur/article/view/212 More Citation Formats ACM ACS APA ABNT Chicago Harvard IEEE MLA Turabian Vancouver Download Citation Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS) BibTeX Share
A new Issue has been published August 30, 2024 A new issue of the Open-Access-Journal "Raumforschung und Raumordnung | Spatial Research and Planning" has been published. Volume 82 No. 4 (2024) is now available on our website.
A new Issue has been published June 28, 2024 A new issue of the Open-Access-Journal "Raumforschung und Raumordnung | Spatial Research and Planning" has been published. Volume 82 No. 3 (2024) is now available on our website.
Call for papers for a special issue on: Planning for sustainability transformations: Theoretical approaches, practical experiences, and political consequences June 3, 2024 Call for papers for a special issue onPlanning for sustainability transformations: Theoretical approaches, practical experiences, and political consequences