Interlocking Firm Networks in the German Knowledge Economy. On Local Networks and Global Connectivity

Authors

  • Stefan Lüthi Lehrstuhl für Raumentwicklung, Technische Universität München, Arcisstraße 21, 80333, München, Deutschland
  • Alain Thierstein Lehrstuhl für Raumentwicklung, Technische Universität München, Arcisstraße 21, 80333, München, Deutschland
  • Michael Bentlage Lehrstuhl für Raumentwicklung, Technische Universität München, Arcisstraße 21, 80333, München, Deutschland

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1007/s13147-011-0088-0

Keywords:

Germany, Knowledge economy, Advanced Producer Services firms, High-Tech firms, Interlocking firm networks

Abstract

the knowledge economy is a key driver of spatial development in metropolitan regions. a relational perspec- tive on its business activities emphasizes the importance of knowledge-intensive firms and their networking strategies. the aim of this paper is to analyse the spatial networking patterns created by the interaction of knowledge-intensive firms and to place these activities in the theoretical context of the knowledge economy. Our central question is which large-scale interlocking networks and functional urban hi- erarchies are produced by advanced Producer services and High-Tech firms located in Germany. The intra-firm loca- tional networks of these companies are analysed on three spatial scales: global, national and regional. the empirical findings show that the functional urban hierarchy in the german city system proves to be steeper than is claimed by the political debate on german Mega-city regions.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Amin, A.; Cohendet, P. (2004): Architectures of Knowledge. Firms, Capabilities, and Communities. Oxford, New York.

Anselin, L.; Varga, A.; Acs, Z. (1997): Local geographic spillovers between university research and high technology innovations. In: Journal of Urban Economics 42, 422-448.

Asheim, B. T.; Coenen, L. (2005): Knowledge bases and regional innovation systems: comparing nordic clusters. In: Research Policy 34, 8, 1173-1190.

Asheim, B. T.; Gertler, M. (2005): The geography of innovation: Regional Innovation Systems. In: Fagerberg, J.; Mowery, D. C.; Nelson, R. R. (eds.): The Oxford Handbook of Innovation. Oxford, 291-317.

Bartlett, C. A.; Ghoshal, S. (2002): Managing Across Borders. The Transnational Solution. Boston.

Beaverstock, J. V.; Smith, R.; Taylor, P. J. (1999): A roster of world cities. In: Cities 16, 6, 445-458.

Becattini, G. (1991): Italian industrial districts: problems and perspectives. In: International Studies of Management & Organization 21, 1, 83-90.

Blotevogel, H. H.; Schmitt, P. (2006): “European Metropolitan Regions” as a new discursive frame in strategic spatial planning and policies in Germany. In: Die Erde 137, 1-2, 55-74.

Borrus, M. (2000): The resurgence of US electronics: Asian production networks and the rise of wintelism. In: Borrus, M.; Ernst, D.; Haggard, S. (eds.): International Production Networks in Asia: Rivalry or Riches? London, 56-78.

Boschma, R. (2005): Proximity and innovation: a critical assessment. In: Regional Studies 39, 1, 61-74.

Bottazzi, L.; Peri, G. (2003): Innovation and spillovers in regions: evidence from European patent data. In: European Economic Review 47, 687-710.

Brenner, N. (1999): Globalisation as reterritorialisation: the re-scaling of urban in the European Union. In: Urban Studies 36, 3, 431-451.

Breschi, S.; Lissoni, F. (2009): Mobility of skilled workers and co-invention networks: an anatomy of localized knowledge flows. In: Journal of Economic Geography 9, 439-468.

Cairncross, F. (1997): The Death of Distance. London.

Castells, M. (2000): The Rise of the Network Society. The Information Age: Economy, Society and Culture, Band 1, 2. Auflage. Malden.

Cooke, P. (1992): Regional Innovation Systems: competitive regulation in the new Europe. In: Geoforum 23, 3, 365-382.

Cooke, P. (2002): Knowledge Economies. Clusters, Learning and Cooperative Advantage. London.

Cooke, P.; De Laurentis, C.; Tödtling, F.; Trippl, M. (2007): Regional Knowledge Economies. Markets, Clusters and Innovation. Cheltenham, Northampton.

Dicken, P. (2007): Global Shift. Mapping the Changing Contours of the World Economy. London.

Dunning, J. H. (2000): The eclectic paradigm as an envelope for economic and business theories of MNE activity. In: International Business Review 9, 163-190.

ESPON (European Spatial Planning Observation Network) (2004): ESPON Project 1.1.1. Potentials for Polycentric Development in Europe. Final Report. Luxembourg.

Florida, R. (2005): The world is spiky. The world in numbers. Globalization has changed the economic playing field, but hasn’t levelled it. In: The Atlantic 26, 3, 48-51.

Friedman, T. L. (2005): The World is Flat. A Brief History of the Twenty-First Century. New York.

Friedmann, J. (1986): The world city hypothesis. In: Development and Change 17, 69-83.

Halbert, L. (2008): Examining the mega-city-region hypothesis: evidence from the Paris city-region/bassin parisien. In: Regional Studies 42, 8, 1147-1160.

Hall, P.; Pain, K. (2006): From Metropolis to Polyopolis. In: Hall, P.; Pain, K (eds.): The Polycentric Metropolis. Learning from Mega-City Regions in Europe. London, 3-18.

Hoover, E. M. (1937): Location Theory and the Shoe and Leather Industries. Cambridge, MA.

Howells, J. (2000): Knowledge, innovation and location. In: Bryson, J. R.; Daniels, P. W.; Henry, N.; Pollard, J. (eds.): Knowledge, Space, Economy. London, New York, 50-62.

Hoyler, M.; Freytag, T.; Mager, C. (2008): Connecting Rhine-Main: the production of multi-scalar polycentricities through knowledge-intensive business services. In: Regional Studies 42, 8, 1095-1111.

Hoyler, M.; Kloosterman, R. C.; Sokol, M. (2008): Polycentric puzzles—emerging mega-city regions seen through the lens of advanced producer services. In: Regional Studies 42, 8, 1055-1064.

Jaffe, A. B.; Trajtenberg, M.; Henderson, R. (1993): Geographic localization of knowledge spillovers as evidenced by patent citations. In: The Quarterly Journal of Economics 108, 577-598.

Knapp, W.; Scherhag, D.; Schmitt, P. (2005): POLYNET Action 2.1. Qualitative analysis of service business connections. Rhine—Ruhr. London.

Knapp, W.; Scherhag, D.; Schmitt, P. (2006): RhineRuhr: ‚polycentricity at its best’? In: Hall, P.; Pain, K (eds.): The Polycentric Metropolis. Learning from Mega-City Regions in Europe. London, 154-162.

Knapp, W.; Schmitt, P.; Danielzyk, R. (2006): RhineRuhr: towards compatibility? Strategic spatial policies for a specific configuration of polycentricity. In: Built Environment 32, 2, 137-147.

Kujath, H. J. (2005): Die neue Rolle der Metropolregionen in der Wissensökonomie. In: Kujath, H. J (Hrsg.): Knoten im Netz. Münster, 23-63. = Stadt- und Regionalwissenschaften, Band 4.

Lüthi, S.; Thierstein, A. (2009): Interlocking firm networks and emerging mega-city regions. A framework to analyze the hidden geography of the knowledge economy in Germany. In: Bernhard, I. (ed.): Uddevalla Symposium 2009. The Geography of Innovation and Entrepreneurship. Trollhättan, 753-776.

Lüthi, S.; Thierstein, A.; Goebel, V. (2010): Intra-firm and extra-firm linkages in the knowledge economy: The case of the emerging mega-city region of Munich. In: Global Networks 10, 1, 114-137.

Maillat, D.; Quévit, M.; Senn, L. (1993): Réseaux d’innovation et milieux innovateurs. In: Maillat, D.; Quévit, M.; Senn, L. (eds.): Réseaux d’innovation et milieux innovateurs: Un pari pour le développement régional. Neuchâtel, 3-12.

Malecki, E. J. (2000): Creating and sustaining competitiveness. Local knowledge and economic geography. In: Bryson, J. R.; Daniels, P. W.; Henry, N.; Pollard, J. (eds.): Knowledge, Space, Economy. London, New York, 103-119.

Markusen, A. (1996): Sticky places in slippery space—A typology of industrial districts. In: Economic Geography 72, 3, 293-313.

Marshall, A. (1920): Principles of Economics. The Concentration of Specialized Industries in Particular Localities. London.

McCann, P.; Acs, Z. J. (2011): Globalization: countries, cities and multinationals. In: Regional Studies 45, 1, 17-32.

MKRO (Ministerkonferenz für Raumordnung) (1995): Weiterentwicklung raumordnungspolitischer Leitbilder und Handlungsstrategien. Beschluss der 32. Ministerkonferenz für Raumordnung am 28.04.2005 in Berlin.

MKRO (Ministerkonferenz für Raumordnung) (2006): Leitbilder und Handlungsstrategien für die Raumentwicklungspolitik in Deutschland. Beschluss der 33. Ministerkonferenz für Raumordnung am 30.06.2006 in Berlin.

Musil, R. (2009): Global capital control and city hierarchies: an attempt to reposition Vienna in a world city network. In: Cities 26, 5, 255-265.

O’Brien, R. (1992): Global Financial Integration: The End of Geography. London.

OECD (1996): The Knowledge-Based Economy. Manual. Online unter: http://www.oecd.org/dataoecd/51/8/1913021.pdf, Stand 04.10.2007 (letzter Zugriff am 03.03.2011).

OECD (2008): Staying Competitive in the Global Economy. Compendium of Studies on Global Value Chains. Paris.

Ohmae, K. (1985): Macht der Triade: die neue Form weltweiten Wettbewerbs. Wiesbaden.

Pain, K. (2008): Examining ‘core-periphery’ relationships in a global city-region: the case of London and South East England. In: Regional Studies 42, 8, 1161-1172.

Pain, K.; Hall, P. (2008): Informational quantity versus informational quality: the perils of navigating the space of flows. In: Regional Studies 42, 8, 1065-1077.

Picot, A.; Reichwald, R.; Wigand, R. (2008): Information, Organization and Management. Heidelberg.

Porter, M. E. (1990): The Competitive Advantage of Nations. London and Basingstoke.

Rozenblat, C. (2010): Opening the black box of agglomeration economies for measuring cities’ competitiveness through international firm networks. In: Urban Studies 47, 13, 2841-2865.

Sassen, S. (1994): Cities in a World Economy. Thousand Oaks.

Sassen, S. (2001): The Global City: New York, London, Tokyo. 2. Auflage. Oxford.

Schürmann, C. (2004): Morphological Analysis of Urban Areas Based on 45-minute Isochrones. Annex Report D to ESPON Project 1.1.1 Potentials for Polycentric Development in Europe. Luxembourg.

Sokol, M.; van Egeraat, C.; Williams, B. (2008): Revisiting the ‘informational city’: space of flows, polycentricity and the geography of knowledge-intensive business services in the emerging global city-region of Dublin. In: Regional Studies 42, 8, 1133-1146.

Storper, M. (1992): The limits to globalization: Technology districts and international trade. In: Economic Geography 68, 1, 60-93.

Taylor, P. J. (2004): World City Network: A Global Urban Analysis. London.

Taylor, P. J. (2007): A brief guide to quantitative data collection at GaWC, 1997-2001. Online unter: http://www.lboro.ac.uk/gawc/guide.html (letzter Zugriff am 14.05.2010).

Taylor, P. J.; Evans, D. M.; Pain, K. (2008): Application of the interlocking network model to mega-city-regions: measuring polycentricity within and beyond city-regions. In: Regional Studies 42, 8, 1079-1093.

Taylor, P. J.; Ni, P.; Derudder, B.; Hoyler, M.; Huang, J.; Witlox, F. (2011): Global Urban Analysis: A Survey of Cities in Globalization. London.

Thierstein, A.; Kruse, C.; Glanzmann, L.; Gabi, S.; Grillon, N. (2006): Raumentwicklung im Verborgenen. Untersuchungen und Handlungsfelder für die Entwicklung der Metropolregion Nordschweiz. Zürich.

Thierstein, A.; Lüthi, S.; Kruse, C.; Gabi, S.; Glanzmann, L. (2008): Changing value chain of the knowledge economy. Spatial impact of intra-firm and inter-firm networks within the emerging mega-city region of northern Switzerland. In: Regional Studies 42, 8, 1113-1131.

Torre, A.; Rallet, A. (2005): Proximity and localization. In: Regional Studies 39, 1, 47-59.

Wood, P. (2002): Consultancy and Innovation: The Business Service Revolution in Europe. London.

Wood, P. (2005): A service-informed approach to regional innovation—or adaptation? In: The Service Industries Journal 25, 4, 429-445.

Downloads

Published

2011-06-30

Issue

Section

Research Article

How to Cite

1.
Lüthi S, Thierstein A, Bentlage M. Interlocking Firm Networks in the German Knowledge Economy. On Local Networks and Global Connectivity. RuR [Internet]. 2011 Jun. 30 [cited 2024 Jun. 22];69(3):161–174. Available from: https://rur.oekom.de/index.php/rur/article/view/782

Share

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 > >>