Regional Structural Change and Resilience

From Lignite Mining to Tourism in the Lusatian Lakeland

Authors

  • Gerd Lintz Leibniz Institute of Ecological Urban and Regional Development, Weberplatz 1, 01217, Dresden, Germany
  • Peter Wirth Leibniz Institute of Ecological Urban and Regional Development, Weberplatz 1, 01217, Dresden, Germany
  • Jörn Harfst Leibniz Institute of Ecological Urban and Regional Development, Weberplatz 1, 01217, Dresden, Germany

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1007/s13147-012-0175-x

Keywords:

Post-mining landscapes, Transformation, Adaptability, Old industrial regions, Policy coordination

Abstract

The terms “resilience” and “vulnerability” have both acquired prominence in recent academic and political debate. Originating in the natural sciences, they have meanwhile established themselves not only in the social sciences, but also—and more recently—in the areas of economic geography, as well as urban and regional development. Nevertheless, as is the case with many of the issues adopted from the natural sciences, the social sciences have had to struggle to fully capture and conceptualise the theoretical meaning of the terms. The present article will explore the added-value and limits of using the notions of resilience and vulnerability in relation to structural change in old industrial regions. It will also draw on empirical information from a qualitative case study of Lusatian Lakeland, a former lignite mining region in Eastern Germany that is currently being turned into a tourist destination. Research focuses on analysing the sectoral and regional cooperation between various actors in the region. The introduction of the terms resilience and vulnerability in this case study raises some interesting questions about the nature and interpretation of regional development processes that are characterised by a high degree of uncertainty and severe structural change. The research results also highlight the conceptual difficulties these terms present, particularly in the context of structural transformation.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Bastian, O.; Schreiber, K.-F. (1999): Analyse und ökologische Bewertung der Landschaft. Heidelberg.

Birkmann, J.; Böhm, H. R.; Buchholz, F.; Büscher, D.; Daschkeit, A.; Ebert, S.; Fleischhauer, M.; Frommer, B.; Köhler, S.; Kufeld, W.; Lenz, S.; Overbeck, G.; Schanze, J.; Schlipf, S.; Sommerfeldt, P.; Stock, M.; Vollmer, M.; Walkenhorst, O. (2011): Glossar Klimawandel und Raumentwicklung. Hannover. = E-Paper der ARL, Nr. 10. Online unter:http://shop.arl-net.de/media/direct/pdf/e-paper_der_arl_nr10.pdf (last accessed 03.04.2012).

Bundesministerium für Umwelt, Naturschutz und Reaktorsicherheit (1994): Ökologischer Aufbau. Braunkohlesanierung Ost. Bonn.

Carpenter, S. R.; Walker, B. H.; Anderies, M. A.; Abel, N. A. (2001): From Metaphor to Measurement: Resilience of What to What? In: Ecosystems 4, 8, 765–781.

Christopherson, S.; Michie, J.; Tyler, P. (2010): Regional resilience: theoretical and empirical perspectives. In: Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society 3, 1, 3–10.

Feiock, R. C. (2007): Rational choice and regional governance. In: Journal of Urban Affairs 29, 1, 47–63.

Folke, C.; Carpenter, S.; Elmqvist, T.; Gunderson, L.; Holling, C. S.; Walker, B.; Bengtsson, J.; Berkes, F.; Colding, J.; Danell, K.; Falkenmark, M.; Gordon, L.; Kasperson, R.; Kautsky, N.; Kinzig, A.; Levin, S.; Mäler, K. G.; Moberg, F.; Ohlsson, L.; Olsson, P.; Ostrom, E.; Reid, W.; Rockström, J.; Savenije, H.; Svedin, U. (2002): Resilience and Sustainable Development: Building Adaptive Capacity in a World of Transformations. Scientific Background Paper on Resilience for the process of The World Summit on Sustainable Development on behalf of The Environmental Advisory Council to the Swedish Government. Online at:http://www.resalliance.org/files/1144440669_resilience_and_sustainable_development.pdf (last accessed 14.12.2012).

Fürst, D. (2003): Steuerung auf regionaler Ebene versus Regional Governance. In: Informationen zur Raumentwicklung 8/9, 441–450.

Grabher, G.; Stark, D. (1997): Organizing Diversity: Evolutionary Theory, Network Analysis and Postsocialism. In: Regional Studies 31, 5, 533–544.

Heidenfelder, R.; Schneider, K. (2005): Wassertouristische Potenziale in der Lausitz zwischen IBA Fürst-Pückler-Land, Seenverbund und “Erlebniswelt”. In: Berkner, A.; Thieme, T. (Hrsg.) Braunkohlenplanung, Bergbaufolgelandschaften, Wasserhaushaltssanierung. Analysen und Fallbeispiele aus dem Rheinischen, Mitteldeutschen und Lausitzer Revier. Hannover, 125–133. = Arbeitsmaterial der ARL, Nr. 323.

Holling, C. S. (1973): Resilience and stability of ecological systems. In: Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 4, 1–23.

Hudson, R. (2010): Resilient regions in an uncertain world: wishful thinking or a practical reality? In: Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society 3, 1, 11–25.

Hutter, G. (2011): Organizing social resilience in the context of natural hazards: a research note. In: Natural Hazards. doi:.1007/s11069-010-9705-4.

Jordan, A.; Lenschow, A. (Hrsg.) (2008): Innovation in environmental policy? Integrating the environment for sustainability. Cheltenham.

Kuhn, R. (2010): Ten Years of the IBA—Looking Ahead. In: Internationale Bauausstellung Fürst-Pückler-Land 2000–2010 (Hrsg.): Post-Mining Landscape. Berlin, 212–217.

Lintz, G.; Müller, B.; Finka, M. (2005): Introduction: The challenge of structural change for industrial cities and regions in the CEE countries. In: Müller, B.; Finka, M.; Lintz, G (Hrsg.): Rise and decline of industry in Central and Eastern Europe. A comparative study of cities and regions in eleven countries. Berlin, 1–23.

Lukesch, R.; Payer, H.; Winkler-Rieder, W. (2010): Wie gehen Regionen mit Krisen um? Eine explorative Studie über die Resilienz von Regionen. Wien. Online at:http://www.bka.gv.at/DocView.axd?CobId=39673 (last accessed 03.04.2012).

Müller, B. (2011): Urban and regional resilience—A new catchword or a consistent concept for research and practice? In: Müller, B. (Hrsg.): Urban regional resilience: How do cities and regions deal with change? Berlin/Heidelberg, 1–13. = German Annual of Spatial Research and Policy 2010.

Nilsson, M. (2005): Learning, frames, and environmental policy integration: the case of Swedish energy policy. In: Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy 23, 2, 207–226.

Pendall, R.; Foster, K. A.; Cowell, M. (2010): Resilience and regions: building understanding of the metaphor. In: Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society 3, 1, 71–84.

Pike, A.; Dawley, S.; Tomaney, J. (2010): Resilience, adaptation and adaptability. In: Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society 3, 1, 59–70.

Schanze, J. (Hrsg.) (2007): Flood risk management research—From extreme events to citizens involvement. Proceedings of the European Symposium on Flood Risk Management Research 2007. Dresden.

Scharpf, F. W. (1997): Games real actors play. Actor-centered institutionalism in policy research. Boulder.

Simmie, J.; Martin, R. (2010): The Economic Resilience of Regions: Towards an Evolutionary Approach. In: Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society 3, 1, 27–43.

von Bismarck, F. (2004): Programm der Braunkohlesanierung: Weichenstellung für Regionen? In: Gläßer, C. (Hrsg.): Nachhaltige Entwicklung von Folgelandschaften des Braunkohlebergbaus. Stand und Perspektiven in Wissenschaft und Praxis. Berlin, 12–19. = Zeitschrift für Angewandte Umweltforschung, Sonderheft 14.

Downloads

Published

2012-08-31

How to Cite

“Regional Structural Change and Resilience: From Lignite Mining to Tourism in the Lusatian Lakeland” (2012) Raumforschung und Raumordnung | Spatial Research and Planning, 70(4), pp. 363–375. doi:10.1007/s13147-012-0175-x.

Most read articles by the same author(s)